Literature DB >> 26847054

Dose Escalation of Tamoxifen in Patients with Low Endoxifen Level: Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-The TADE Study.

Peter Fox1, Rosemary L Balleine2, Clara Lee1, Bo Gao3, Bavanthi Balakrishnar1, Alexander M Menzies1, Shang Heng Yeap1, Sayed Sahanawaz Ali1, Val Gebski1, Pamela Provan3, Sally Coulter4, Christopher Liddle5, Rina Hui3, Richard Kefford3, Jodi Lynch6, Mark Wong3, Nicholas Wilcken3, Howard Gurney7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endoxifen is the major mediator of tamoxifen effect and endoxifen levels <15 nmol/L may be associated with increased risk of breast cancer recurrence. We increased tamoxifen dose in breast cancer patients with low endoxifen levels and assessed the influence of various parameters on reaching 15 nmol/L and 30 nmol/L endoxifen levels. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Tamoxifen dose was increased in those with endoxifen levels below 30 nmol/L. Toxicity, including hot flash score, was measured. CYP2D6 metabolizer status was classified as ultra-rapid (UM), extensive (EM), intermediate (IM), or poor (PM) based genotype of somatic DNA.
RESULTS: Dosage was escalated in 68 of 122 participants. On 20 mg tamoxifen, 24% had endoxifen levels below 15 nmol/L and this reduced to 6% following dose escalation. In over 50% of cases, there was no identified cause for low endoxifen. Low baseline endoxifen level, and not CYP2D6 metabolizer status, independently predicted reaching threshold targets for both the 15 nmol/L and 30 nmol/L targets (P = 0.04 and 0.003 respectively). The 15 nmol/L target was reached in all UM/EM and IM patients, 63% of PM patients, and 58% of those with baseline endoxifen of <10 nmol/L. There was no correlation between hot flash score and genotype or any tamoxifen metabolite level including endoxifen (R = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: Low endoxifen on standard dose tamoxifen was the only independent predictor of failure to achieve potentially therapeutic levels. Trials examining tamoxifen dose escalation and breast cancer outcome should be guided by endoxifen levels alone, without reference to CYP2D6 genotype or presence of hot flashes. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3164-71. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Hertz and Rae, p. 3121. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847054     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  30 in total

Review 1.  Individualized dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology is crucial in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Stefanie L Groenland; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Tamoxifen metabolism in breast cancer treatment: Taking the focus off the CYP2D6 gene.

Authors:  A Novillo; A Romero-Lorca; M Gaibar; M Rubio; A Fernández-Santander
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Individualized Tamoxifen Dose Escalation: Confirmation of Feasibility, Question of Utility.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; James M Rae
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Comprehensive assessment of cytochromes P450 and transporter genetics with endoxifen concentration during tamoxifen treatment.

Authors:  Lauren A Marcath; Allison M Deal; Emily Van Wieren; William Danko; Christine M Walko; Joseph G Ibrahim; Karen E Weck; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta; Howard L McLeod; Lisa A Carey; William J Irvin; Daniel L Hertz
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Exploiting Pharmacokinetic Models of Tamoxifen and Endoxifen to Identify Factors Causing Subtherapeutic Concentrations in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lena Klopp-Schulze; Markus Joerger; Sebastian G Wicha; Rob Ter Heine; Chantal Csajka; Zinnia P Parra-Guillen; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Precision Dosing of Targeted Therapies Is Ready for Prime Time.

Authors:  Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema; Stefanie L Groenland; Remy B Verheijen; Markus Joerger; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alex Sparreboom; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Computational Treatment Simulations to Assess the Need for Personalized Tamoxifen Dosing in Breast Cancer Patients of Different Biogeographical Groups.

Authors:  Anna Mueller-Schoell; Robin Michelet; Lena Klopp-Schulze; Madelé van Dyk; Thomas E Mürdter; Matthias Schwab; Markus Joerger; Wilhelm Huisinga; Gerd Mikus; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as a New Biosampling Tool for Monitoring of Tamoxifen, Endoxifen, 4-OH Tamoxifen and N-Desmethyltamoxifen in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Baitha Palanggatan Maggadani; Samuel J Haryono; Marcellino Ryan Rinaldi; Yahdiana Harahap
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Analysis of tamoxifen and its metabolites in dried blood spot and volumetric absorptive microsampling: comparison and clinical application.

Authors:  Baitha Palanggatan Maggadani; Yahdiana Harahap; Samuel J Haryono; Christoffel William Putra Untu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Frankincense, pine needle and geranium essential oils suppress tumor progression through the regulation of the AMPK/mTOR pathway in breast cancer.

Authors:  Peng Ren; Xiang Ren; Lei Cheng; Lixin Xu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.