Literature DB >> 26847053

MET Amplification and Exon 14 Splice Site Mutation Define Unique Molecular Subgroups of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with Poor Prognosis.

Joanna H Tong1, Sai F Yeung1, Anthony W H Chan1, Lau Y Chung1, Shuk L Chau1, Raymond Wai Ming Lung1, Carol Y Tong1, Chit Chow1, Edith K Y Tin1, Yau H Yu1, Hui Li1, Yi Pan1, Wing P Chak1, Calvin S H Ng2, Tony S K Mok3, Ka F To4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Activation of MET oncogene as the result of amplification or activation mutation represents an emerging molecular target for cancer treatment. We comprehensively studied MET alterations and the clinicopathologic correlations in a large cohort of treatment-naïve non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Six hundred eighty-seven NSCLCs were tested for MET exon 14 splicing site mutation (METΔ14), DNA copy number alterations, and protein expression by Sanger sequencing, FISH, and IHC, respectively.
RESULTS: METΔ14 mutation was detected in 2.62% (18/687) of NSCLC. The mutation rates were 2.6% in adenocarcinoma, 4.8% in adenosquamous carcinoma, and 31.8% in sarcomatoid carcinoma. METΔ14 mutation was not detected in squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma but significantly enriched in sarcomatoid carcinoma (P < 0.001). METΔ14 occurred mutually exclusively with known driver mutations but tended to coexist with MET amplification or copy number gain (P < 0.001). Low-level MET amplification and polysomy might occur in the background of EGFR or KRAS mutation whereas high-level amplification (MET/CEP7 ratio ≥5) was mutually exclusive to the major driver genes except METΔ14. Oncogenic METΔ14 mutation and/or high-level amplification occurred in a total of 3.3% (23/687) of NSCLC and associated with higher MET protein expression. METΔ14 occurred more frequently in older patients whereas amplification was more common in ever-smokers. Both METΔ14 and high-level amplification were independent prognostic factors that predicted poorer survival by multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of METΔ14 mutation in sarcomatoid carcinoma suggested that MET inhibition might benefit this specific subgroup of patients. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 3048-56. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Drilon, p. 2832. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847053     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  107 in total

1.  Tepotinib Efficacy in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastasis Harboring an HLA-DRB1-MET Gene Fusion.

Authors:  Félix Blanc-Durand; Raafat Alameddine; Anthony J Iafrate; Danh Tran-Thanh; Ying-Chun Lo; Normand Blais; Bertrand Routy; Mustapha Tehfé; Charles Leduc; Phillipe Romeo; Phillipe Stephenson; Marie Florescu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-08

2.  Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea With MET Exon 14 Skipping.

Authors:  Joon Young Hur; Bo Mi Ku; Joon Ho Shim; Hyun Ae Jung; Jong-Mu Sun; Se-Hoon Lee; Jin Seok Ahn; Keunchil Park; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  MET IHC Is a Poor Screen for MET Amplification or MET Exon 14 Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Data from a Tri-Institutional Cohort of the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium.

Authors:  Robin Guo; Lynne D Berry; Dara L Aisner; Jamie Sheren; Theresa Boyle; Paul A Bunn; Bruce E Johnson; David J Kwiatkowski; Alexander Drilon; Lynette M Sholl; Mark G Kris
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Combination MET- and EGFR-directed therapy in MET-overexpressing non-small cell lung cancers: time to move on to better biomarkers?

Authors:  Fernando C Santini; Siddharth Kunte; Alexander Drilon
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  MET exon 14 juxtamembrane splicing mutations: clinical and therapeutical perspectives for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sara Pilotto; Anastasios Gkountakos; Luisa Carbognin; Aldo Scarpa; Giampaolo Tortora; Emilio Bria
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-01

6.  Genetic screening and molecular characterization of MET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Saigi; A McLeer-Florin; E Pros; E Nadal; E Brambilla; M Sanchez-Cespedes
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  The multiple paths towards MET receptor addiction in cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Duplaquet; Zoulika Kherrouche; Simon Baldacci; Philippe Jamme; Alexis B Cortot; Marie-Christine Copin; David Tulasne
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10

9.  MET-GRB2 Signaling-Associated Complexes Correlate with Oncogenic MET Signaling and Sensitivity to MET Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith; Thomas Licata; Aliya Lakhani; Marileila Varella Garcia; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Vincent Vuaroqueaux; Balazs Halmos; Alain C Borczuk; Y Ann Chen; Benjamin C Creelan; Theresa A Boyle; Eric B Haura
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Biology of the mRNA Splicing Machinery and Its Dysregulation in Cancer Providing Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Maxime Blijlevens; Jing Li; Victor W van Beusechem
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.