Roman C Brands1,2, Franziska Herbst3, Stefan Hartmann3,4, Axel Seher3, Christian Linz3, Alexander C Kübler3, Urs D A Müller-Richter3. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. brands_r@ukw.de. 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 6, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. brands_r@ukw.de. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. 4. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common tumor entities worldwide. Unfortunately, recent drug developments in other fields of oncology have yielded no efficacy in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. As a new starting point, we investigated the impact of Fas ligand (FasL) and the SMAC-mimetic compound LCL161 in mono- and combination treatment in HNSCC cell lines. METHODS: Five different cell lines of HNSCC were treated with FasL and LCL161 in mono- and combination treatment. Cytotoxicity was measured via a crystal violet assay. The cell lines were characterized for CD95 (FasL receptor) expression via flow cytometry. The degradation of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1) was detected via Western blot. RESULTS: Incubation with FasL led to a significant decrease in three out of five cell lines. Combination treatment with LCL161 enhanced cytotoxicity significantly. Two cell lines were FasL resistant, but one of them could be resensitized with LCL161. In all cell lines, Western blot analysis showed degradation of cIAP1 after LCL161 application. However, one cell line showed only minor vulnerability to the FasL and LCL161 combination. CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating combination treatment of FasL and LCL161 in head and neck cancer cell lines. Pro-apoptotic effects of the combination were detected in the majority of the cell lines. Interestingly, one of two FasL-resistant cell lines was sensitive to the combination therapy with FasL and LCL161. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SMAC-mimetic compounds show promising results in the treatment of other tumor entities in vitro and might be useful drugs to improve HNSCC therapy.
OBJECTIVES: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common tumor entities worldwide. Unfortunately, recent drug developments in other fields of oncology have yielded no efficacy in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. As a new starting point, we investigated the impact of Fas ligand (FasL) and the SMAC-mimetic compound LCL161 in mono- and combination treatment in HNSCC cell lines. METHODS: Five different cell lines of HNSCC were treated with FasL and LCL161 in mono- and combination treatment. Cytotoxicity was measured via a crystal violet assay. The cell lines were characterized for CD95 (FasL receptor) expression via flow cytometry. The degradation of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1) was detected via Western blot. RESULTS: Incubation with FasL led to a significant decrease in three out of five cell lines. Combination treatment with LCL161 enhanced cytotoxicity significantly. Two cell lines were FasL resistant, but one of them could be resensitized with LCL161. In all cell lines, Western blot analysis showed degradation of cIAP1 after LCL161 application. However, one cell line showed only minor vulnerability to the FasL and LCL161 combination. CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating combination treatment of FasL and LCL161 in head and neck cancer cell lines. Pro-apoptotic effects of the combination were detected in the majority of the cell lines. Interestingly, one of two FasL-resistant cell lines was sensitive to the combination therapy with FasL and LCL161. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SMAC-mimetic compounds show promising results in the treatment of other tumor entities in vitro and might be useful drugs to improve HNSCC therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
HNSCC; LCL161; SMAC mimetic compound; Small molecules; Targeted therapy
Authors: S Hartmann; U Kriegebaum; N Küchler; R C Brands; C Linz; A C Kübler; U D A Müller-Richter Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Lin Li; Ranny Mathew Thomas; Hidetaka Suzuki; Jef K De Brabander; Xiaodong Wang; Patrick G Harran Journal: Science Date: 2004-09-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Stefan Hartmann; Ulrike Kriegebaum; Nora Küchler; Grit Lessner; Roman C Brands; Christian Linz; Tim Schneider; Alexander C Kübler; Urs D A Müller-Richter Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Roy Xiao; Clint T Allen; Linda Tran; Priya Patel; So-Jin Park; Zhong Chen; Carter Van Waes; Nicole C Schmitt Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Roy Xiao; Yi An; Wenda Ye; Adeeb Derakhshan; Hui Cheng; Xinping Yang; Clint Allen; Zhong Chen; Nicole C Schmitt; Carter Van Waes Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Roman C Brands; Mario J J Scheurer; Stefan Hartmann; Axel Seher; Alexander C Kübler; Urs D A Müller-Richter Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Wenda Ye; Sreenivasulu Gunti; Clint T Allen; Youji Hong; Paul E Clavijo; Carter Van Waes; Nicole C Schmitt Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Paul A Townsend; Maria V Kozhevnikova; Olivier N F Cexus; Andrey A Zamyatnin; Surinder M Soond Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-11-09