Literature DB >> 26846907

Characterization of published randomized controlled trials assessing clinical pharmacy services around the world.

Inajara Rotta1, Thais Teles Souza1, Teresa M Salgado2, Cassyano J Correr3, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos4.   

Abstract

A critical analysis of the research on clinical pharmacy services with regards to study characteristics has not been undertaken since 1998. However, several meta-analyses have been conducted to demonstrate the impact of pharmacists' interventions in specific medical conditions. These meta-analyses present high heterogeneity in part because the interventions are poorly and inconsistently described in primary studies. The aim of this article is to present the characteristics of randomized control trials (RCTs) that assess clinical pharmacy services to identify areas of improvement in future pharmacy practice research studies. Different emphasis of research across geographic regions of the world were also examined. During these 40 years, 520 articles reporting 439 RCTs assessing clinical pharmacy services were published. Of the 439 studies, 77.7% (n = 341) were published in the year 2000 or thereafter, 41.46% (n = 182) were conducted in the US, 27.56% (n = 121) in Europe, and 30.98% (n = 136) in the rest of the world. Studies in pharmacy practice have improved in terms of design, with an increase in the number of published RCTs after 2000. However, the small sample size of RCTs is still an issue. After 2000, a significantly higher proportion of studies were conducted in community pharmacy, targeting specific medical conditions, and with a higher number of patients randomized to the intervention group. Conversely, a significantly smaller proportion of studies were conducted in the hospital and targeted a single recipient after 2000. Studies conducted in the US had significantly more intervention arms, focused mostly on a specific medical condition, and were performed in primary care. Different health care systems' organization and policies may influence clinical pharmacy services research across countries. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based practice; Pharmaceutical services; Pharmacists; Randomized controlled trials as topic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846907     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  3 in total

1.  Use of 'Pharmaceutical services' Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions.

Authors:  Fernanda S Tonin; Vanessa Gmünder; Aline F Bonetti; Antonio M Mendes; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2022-08-20

2.  The appearance and increase in the quantity and proportion of the clinical research coordinator's service fee in drug clinical trial research fund and its impact on trial quality.

Authors:  Liran Chen; Zhimin Chen; Huafang Chen
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 3.  Effectiveness of pharmacist's intervention in the management of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Marina Caserini
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-01-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.