Literature DB >> 26846724

Seed handling by primary frugivores differentially influence post-dispersal seed removal of Chinese yew by ground-dwelling animals.

Yang Pan1, Bing Bai1,2, Tianshi Xiong1, Peijian Shi3, Changhu Lu1.   

Abstract

Seed handling by primary frugivores can influence secondary dispersal and/or predation of post-dispersal seeds by attracting different guilds of ground-dwelling animals. Many studies have focused on seeds embedded in feces of mammals or birds; however, less is known about how ground-dwelling animals treat seeds regurgitated by birds (without pulp and not embedded in feces). To compare the effect of differential seed handling by primary dispersers on secondary seed removal of Chinese yew (Taxus chinensis var. mairei), we conducted a series of exclosure experiments to determine the relative impact of animals on the removal of defecated seeds (handled by masked palm civet), regurgitated seeds (handled by birds) and intact fruits. All types of yew seeds were consistently removed at a higher rate by rodents than by ants. Regurgitated seeds had the highest removal percentage and were only removed by rodents. These seeds were probably eaten in situ without being secondarily dispersed. Defecated seeds were removed by both rodents and ants; only ants might act as secondary dispersers of defecated seeds, whereas rodents ate most of them. We inferred that seeds regurgitated by birds were subjected to the highest rates of predation, whereas those dispersed in the feces of masked palm civets probably had a higher likelihood of secondary dispersal. Seeds from feces attracted ants, which were likely to transport seeds and potentially provided a means by which the seeds could escape predation by rodents. Our study highlighted that primary dispersal by birds might not always facilitate secondary dispersal and establishment of plant populations.
© 2016 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Taxus chinensis; arils; defecated seeds; regurgitated seeds; secondary seed dispersal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846724     DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Zool        ISSN: 1749-4869            Impact factor:   2.654


  4 in total

1.  Dispersal of remnant endangered trees in a fragmented and disturbed forest by frugivorous birds.

Authors:  Ning Li; Bing Bai; Xin-Hai Li; Shu-Qing An; Chang-Hu Lu
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Does scatter-hoarding of seeds benefit cache owners or pilferers?

Authors:  Haifeng Gu; Qingjian Zhao; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.654

3.  Handling by avian frugivores affects diaspore secondary removal.

Authors:  Tadeu J Guerra; João V S Messeder; André J Arruda; Lisieux F Fuzessy; Roberta L C Dayrell; Frederico S Neves; Fernando A O Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of intraspecific variation in seed dispersal are diverse and pervasive.

Authors:  Eugene W Schupp; Rafal Zwolak; Landon R Jones; Rebecca S Snell; Noelle G Beckman; Clare Aslan; Brittany R Cavazos; Edu Effiom; Evan C Fricke; Flavia Montaño-Centellas; John Poulsen; Onja H Razafindratsima; Manette E Sandor; Katriona Shea
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.276

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.