İlkay Boz1, Gamze Teskereci2, Gülay Akman3. 1. Akdeniz University, Nursing Faculty, Antalya, Turkey. Electronic address: ilkayarslan@akdeniz.edu.tr. 2. Akdeniz University, Nursing Faculty, Antalya, Turkey. Electronic address: gteskereci@akdeniz.edu.tr. 3. Samsun School of Health, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55100, Turkey. Electronic address: gulaydalakman@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the most important decisions that women have to make after becoming pregnant concerns their mode of birth, and these decisions are influenced by complex physiological, psychological and socio-cultural factors. AIM: To obtain in-depth descriptions of nulliparous women's experiences during the decision-making process for their mode of birth and to reveal their beliefs, attitudes and values. METHODS: This is a qualitative, phenomenological study that included 29 nulliparous women. Data were collected using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and analysed using the constant comparison method and guidelines developed by Collaizi. FINDINGS: The women's experiences during their decision-making process for their mode of birth were placed into one of four categories, "getting confused", "no matter what happens", "others influencing women's decisions" and "make a decision one way or the other". Vaginal births were considered under the theme "natural but hard way" and caesarean sections under the theme "easy choice". The women indicated that they wanted to have vaginal births, but that they were not offered knowledge and support about modes of birth from health care professionals and, as a result, they asked their relatives for support. CONCLUSION: It is important to obtain pregnant women's preferences for modes of birth so that knowledge, support and care can be provided and so that they can be involved in the decision-making process. Therefore, health care professionals should understand pregnant women's experiences during the decision-making process for their mode of birth.
BACKGROUND: One of the most important decisions that women have to make after becoming pregnant concerns their mode of birth, and these decisions are influenced by complex physiological, psychological and socio-cultural factors. AIM: To obtain in-depth descriptions of nulliparous women's experiences during the decision-making process for their mode of birth and to reveal their beliefs, attitudes and values. METHODS: This is a qualitative, phenomenological study that included 29 nulliparous women. Data were collected using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and analysed using the constant comparison method and guidelines developed by Collaizi. FINDINGS: The women's experiences during their decision-making process for their mode of birth were placed into one of four categories, "getting confused", "no matter what happens", "others influencing women's decisions" and "make a decision one way or the other". Vaginal births were considered under the theme "natural but hard way" and caesarean sections under the theme "easy choice". The women indicated that they wanted to have vaginal births, but that they were not offered knowledge and support about modes of birth from health care professionals and, as a result, they asked their relatives for support. CONCLUSION: It is important to obtain pregnant women's preferences for modes of birth so that knowledge, support and care can be provided and so that they can be involved in the decision-making process. Therefore, health care professionals should understand pregnant women's experiences during the decision-making process for their mode of birth.
Authors: Mercedes Colomar; Newton Opiyo; Carol Kingdon; Qian Long; Soledad Nion; Meghan A Bohren; Ana Pilar Betran Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.240