Literature DB >> 26846488

Why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus.

Tamara Kayali Browne.   

Abstract

A new technique called non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been developed, which can detect a range of genetic and chromosomal diseases, as well as fetal sex earlier, more easily and more reliably. NIPT, therefore, potentially expands the market for sex determination and sex selective abortion. This paper argues that both practices should be prevented by not including fetal sex in prenatal test reports. This is because there is a discrepancy between what parents are concerned with (gender) and what the prenatal test can provide (sex). The paper first presents arguments, which indicate a difference between sex and gender before presenting parental motivations for sex selection and sex determination to show that parents are not concerned with their child's sex chromosomes, or even their genitalia, but the gender role that their child will espouse. That, however, is not something that a prenatal test can provide. We are thus left with a situation in which what parents are told, and what they think they are being told, are two different things. In other words, as the conflation of sex with gender is implicit in the disclosure of fetal sex, it may be more accurate to refer to it as misinformation. This misinformation promotes sexism via gender essentialism, which is neither in the interests of the future child nor society. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Embryos and Fetuses; Feminism; Sex Predetermination/Selection; Sexuality/Gender

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846488     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.

Authors:  Tamara Kayali Browne
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".

Authors:  Arianne Shahvisi
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 3.  Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Cara Mand; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.050

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.