Philip L Ritter1, Kate Lorig1, Diana D Laurent1. 1. Stanford Patient Education Research Center, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Dr Ritter, Dr Lorig, Ms Laurent).
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of the Spanish-language diabetes self-efficacy scale (DSES-S) and the English-language version (DSES). METHODS: This study consists of secondary data from 3 randomized studies that administered the DSES-S and DSES at 2 time points. The scales consist of 8 Likert-type 10-point items. Principal component analysis was applied to determine if the scales were unitary or consisted of subscales. Univariate statistics were used to describe the scales. Sensitivity to change was measured by comparing randomized treatment with control groups, where the treatment included methods designed to enhance self-efficacy. General linear models were used to examine the association between the scales and the 8 medical outcomes after controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Principal component analysis indicated that there were 2 subscales for both versions: self-efficacy for behaviors and self-efficacy to manage blood levels and medical condition. The measures had similar means across the 3 studies, high internal consistent reliability, values distributed across the entire range, and they showed no evidence of floor effects and little evidence of ceiling effects. The measures were sensitive to change. They were associated with several health indicators and behaviors at baseline, and changes were associated with changes in health measures. CONCLUSIONS: The self-efficacy measures behaved consistently across the 3 studies and were highly reliable. Associations with medical indicators and behaviors suggested validity, although further study would be desirable to compare other measures of self-efficacy for people with type 2 diabetes. These brief scales are appropriate for measuring self-efficacy to manage diabetes.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of the Spanish-language diabetes self-efficacy scale (DSES-S) and the English-language version (DSES). METHODS: This study consists of secondary data from 3 randomized studies that administered the DSES-S and DSES at 2 time points. The scales consist of 8 Likert-type 10-point items. Principal component analysis was applied to determine if the scales were unitary or consisted of subscales. Univariate statistics were used to describe the scales. Sensitivity to change was measured by comparing randomized treatment with control groups, where the treatment included methods designed to enhance self-efficacy. General linear models were used to examine the association between the scales and the 8 medical outcomes after controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Principal component analysis indicated that there were 2 subscales for both versions: self-efficacy for behaviors and self-efficacy to manage blood levels and medical condition. The measures had similar means across the 3 studies, high internal consistent reliability, values distributed across the entire range, and they showed no evidence of floor effects and little evidence of ceiling effects. The measures were sensitive to change. They were associated with several health indicators and behaviors at baseline, and changes were associated with changes in health measures. CONCLUSIONS: The self-efficacy measures behaved consistently across the 3 studies and were highly reliable. Associations with medical indicators and behaviors suggested validity, although further study would be desirable to compare other measures of self-efficacy for people with type 2 diabetes. These brief scales are appropriate for measuring self-efficacy to manage diabetes.
Authors: Panan Pichayapinyo; Laura R Saslow; James E Aikens; Nicolle Marinec; Jutatip Sillabutra; Piyamon Rattanapongsai; John D Piette Journal: Int J Nurs Pract Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 2.066
Authors: Elizabeth M Heitkemper; Lena Mamykina; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Arlene Smaldone Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Kevin A Matlock; Melanie Broadley; Christel Hendrieckx; Mark Clowes; Anthea Sutton; Simon R Heller; Bastiaan E de Galan; Frans Pouwer; Jane Speight Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 4.213
Authors: Robin Whittemore; Mireya Vilar-Compte; Selene De La Cerda; Roberta Delvy; Sangchoon Jeon; Soraya Burrola-Méndez; Mariana Pardo-Carrillo; Annel Lozano-Marrufo; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2020-04-14
Authors: Bryan C Batch; Susan E Spratt; Dan V Blalock; Chad Benditz; Andi Weiss; Rowena J Dolor; Alex H Cho Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Monica M DiNardo; Carol Greco; Angela D Phares; Nicole M Beyer; Ada O Youk; D Scott Obrosky; Natalia E Morone; Jason E Owen; Shaddy K Saba; Stephen J Suss; Linda Siminerio Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2022-03
Authors: Kate Lorig; Philip L Ritter; Ralph M Turner; Kathleen English; Diana D Laurent; Jay Greenberg Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Joni Beck; Deborah A Greenwood; Lori Blanton; Sandra T Bollinger; Marcene K Butcher; Jo Ellen Condon; Marjorie Cypress; Priscilla Faulkner; Amy Hess Fischl; Theresa Francis; Leslie E Kolb; Jodi M Lavin-Tompkins; Janice MacLeod; Melinda Maryniuk; Carolé Mensing; Eric A Orzeck; David D Pope; Jodi L Pulizzi; Ardis A Reed; Andrew S Rhinehart; Linda Siminerio; Jing Wang Journal: Diabetes Spectr Date: 2017-11