Harm J van der Horn1, Edith J Liemburg2, Myrthe E Scheenen3, Myrthe E de Koning1, Jan-Bernard C Marsman2, Jacoba M Spikman3, Joukje van der Naalt1. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. BCN NeuroImaging Center and Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of brain networks in emotion regulation and post-traumatic complaints in the sub-acute phase after non-complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fifty-four patients with mTBI (34 with and 20 without complaints) and 20 healthy controls (group-matched for age, sex, education, and handedness) were included. Resting-state fMRI was performed at four weeks post-injury. Static and dynamic functional connectivity were studied within and between the default mode, executive (frontoparietal and bilateral frontal network), and salience network. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was used to measure anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D). PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: Regarding within-network functional connectivity, none of the selected brain networks were different between groups. Regarding between-network interactions, patients with complaints exhibited lower functional connectivity between the bilateral frontal and salience network compared to patients without complaints. In the total patient group, higher HADS-D scores were related to lower functional connectivity between the bilateral frontal network and both the right frontoparietal and salience network, and to higher connectivity between the right frontoparietal and salience network. Furthermore, whereas higher HADS-D scores were associated with lower connectivity within the parietal midline areas of the bilateral frontal network, higher HADS-A scores were related to lower connectivity within medial prefrontal areas of the bilateral frontal network. CONCLUSIONS: Functional interactions of the executive and salience networks were related to emotion regulation and complaints after mTBI, with a key role for the bilateral frontal network. These findings may have implications for future studies on the effect of psychological interventions.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of brain networks in emotion regulation and post-traumatic complaints in the sub-acute phase after non-complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fifty-four patients with mTBI (34 with and 20 without complaints) and 20 healthy controls (group-matched for age, sex, education, and handedness) were included. Resting-state fMRI was performed at four weeks post-injury. Static and dynamic functional connectivity were studied within and between the default mode, executive (frontoparietal and bilateral frontal network), and salience network. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was used to measure anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D). PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: Regarding within-network functional connectivity, none of the selected brain networks were different between groups. Regarding between-network interactions, patients with complaints exhibited lower functional connectivity between the bilateral frontal and salience network compared to patients without complaints. In the total patient group, higher HADS-D scores were related to lower functional connectivity between the bilateral frontal network and both the right frontoparietal and salience network, and to higher connectivity between the right frontoparietal and salience network. Furthermore, whereas higher HADS-D scores were associated with lower connectivity within the parietal midline areas of the bilateral frontal network, higher HADS-A scores were related to lower connectivity within medial prefrontal areas of the bilateral frontal network. CONCLUSIONS: Functional interactions of the executive and salience networks were related to emotion regulation and complaints after mTBI, with a key role for the bilateral frontal network. These findings may have implications for future studies on the effect of psychological interventions.
Authors: Minna Wäljas; Grant L Iverson; Rael T Lange; Ullamari Hakulinen; Prasun Dastidar; Heini Huhtala; Suvi Liimatainen; Kaisa Hartikainen; Juha Öhman Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Valerie Bonnelle; Robert Leech; Kirsi M Kinnunen; Tim E Ham; Cristian F Beckmann; Xavier De Boissezon; Richard J Greenwood; David J Sharp Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: David C Zhu; Tracey Covassin; Sally Nogle; Scarlett Doyle; Doozie Russell; Randolph L Pearson; Jeffrey Monroe; Christine M Liszewski; J Kevin DeMarco; David I Kaufman Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Ilya M Veer; Christian F Beckmann; Marie-José van Tol; Luca Ferrarini; Julien Milles; Dick J Veltman; André Aleman; Mark A van Buchem; Nic J van der Wee; Serge A R B Rombouts Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2010-09-20
Authors: Timothy B Meier; Monica Giraldo-Chica; Lezlie Y España; Andrew R Mayer; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Andrew S Nencka; Yang Wang; Kevin M Koch; Yu-Chien Wu; Andrew J Saykin; Christopher C Giza; Joshua Goldman; John P DiFiori; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jason P Mihalik; Alison Brooks; Steven P Broglio; Thomas McAllister; Michael A McCrea Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Harm J van der Horn; Edith J Liemburg; Myrthe E Scheenen; Myrthe E de Koning; Jacoba M Spikman; Joukje van der Naalt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: William T McCuddy; Lezlie Y España; Lindsay D Nelson; Rasmus M Birn; Andrew R Mayer; Timothy B Meier Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Harm J van der Horn; Victor M Vergara; Flor A Espinoza; Vince D Calhoun; Andrew R Mayer; Joukje van der Naalt Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Harm Jan van der Horn; Manon L Out; Myrthe E de Koning; Andrew R Mayer; Jacoba M Spikman; Iris E Sommer; Joukje van der Naalt Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Hector Arciniega; Jorja Shires; Sarah Furlong; Alexandrea Kilgore-Gomez; Adelle Cerreta; Nicholas G Murray; Marian E Berryhill Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Nicholas S Race; Katharine D Andrews; Elizabeth A Lungwitz; Sasha M Vega Alvarez; Timothy R Warner; Glen Acosta; Jiayue Cao; Kun-Han Lu; Zhongming Liu; Amy D Dietrich; Sreeparna Majumdar; Anantha Shekhar; William A Truitt; Riyi Shi Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Matilde Capi; Leda Marina Pomes; Giulia Andolina; Martina Curto; Paolo Martelletti; Luana Lionetto Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 3.390