| Literature DB >> 26846167 |
Hyunah Lee1, Donggyu Nam1, Jae-Kyung Choi2, Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo3,4, Soon-Yong Kwon1,5, Holm Zaehres6, Taehee Lee1, Chan Young Park1, Hyun-Wook Kang1, Hans R Schöler6, Jeong Beom Kim1.
Abstract
The maintenance of undifferentiated human pluripotent stem cells (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26846167 PMCID: PMC4742916 DOI: 10.1038/srep20708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Structural and optical properties of DAS-NG coated culture substrates.
(a) Schematic diagrams of diffusion assisted synthesis-grown nanocrystalline graphene (DAS-NG) preparation on transparent substrates including GL, ITO, and QU for hPSC cultivation. (GBs, Grain boundaries; Ni, Nickel). (b) Optical microscopy images of DAS-NG layers grown at 260 °C on GL, ITO and QU. Graphene layers are indicated with white arrows. (c) Transmittances of DAS/GL (black), DAS/ITO (green) and DAS/QU (red). (d,e) AFM images of (d) 3 dimensional DAS-NG layers on GL with high-density multilayer graphene ridges (red arrow) and (e) 2 dimensional CVD graphene layers on GL. (f) Plot of surface Root-mean-square roughness from AFM images (5 × 5 μm2) of GL, CVD/GL and DAS/GL. (g) Raman spectra of GL (grey), CVD/GL (blue) and DAS/GL (black). (h,i) Images of water drop (40 μl on 1.5 × 1.5 cm2) contact angle on (h) DAS/GL and (i) CVD/GL. (j) Plot of water contact angle measurements on bare GL, CVD/GL and DAS/GL. (k) FT-IR spectra of CVD/GL and DAS/GL. Scale bar, 1 μm (d,e). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m (n = 3) (f,j).
Figure 2Feeder-free cultivation of hPSC on DAS-NG.
(a,b) Morphology of hiPSC seeded on (a) DAS/GL and (b) CVD/GL at day 1. (c,d) High magnification of hiPSC grown on (c) DAS/GL and (d) CVD/GL at day 3. (e–g) SEM images of hiPSC cultured on (e) MEF, (f) DAS/GL at day 3 and (g) Zoomed inset shows hiPSC (arrow) attached on graphene ridges (arrow heads) of DAS-NG. (h–j) Morphology of hiPSC colonies cultured on (h) DAS/GL, (i) MEF and (j) bare GL at 2 weeks. (k) The growth rates and mean doubling times (mDT) of hiPSC cultured on MEF, Matrigel or DAS/GL over 15 days. The points refer to the cell number of hiPSC every 3 days. The inset table represents mean doubling time. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m (n = 3). (l) Percentage of OCT4+ hiPSC cultured on MEF or DAS/GL at P1, P5 and P9. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m (n = 3). Scale bar, 200 μm (a–f), 1 μm (g), 1 mm (h–j).
Figure 3Characterization of hiPSC cultured on DAS/GL.
(a) Fluorescence images of immunostained hiPSC or hESC with the pluripotency markers (OCT4, SSEA4, TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81). (b–e) Pairwise scatter plots comparing global gene expression profile between (b) hiPSC-DAS/GL and hiPSC-MEF, (c) hiPSC-MEF and hESC-MEF, (d) hiPSC-GL and hiPSC-MEF, and (e) hiPSC-GL and hiPSC-DAS/GL. Distributions of plutipotency marker genes (OCT4, SOX2, cMYC, KLF4 and LIN28) are indicated in the scatter plots. The black lines indicate the boundaries of two-fold changes in gene expression level. Gene expression levels are shown in log2 scale. (f) Hierarchical clustering analysis of hiPSC-MEF, hiPSC-DAS/GL, hESC-MEF and hiPSC-GL. (g) In vitro differentiation analysis of hiPSC-DAS/GL and hESC-DAS/GL stained with three germ layer markers, TUJ1 (ectoderm), AFP (endoderm) and α-SMA (mesoderm) after embryoid body (EB) formation. Cells were counterstained with DAPI. (h) Teratoma formation observed at 6 weeks after transplantation of hiPSC-DAS/GL and hiPSC-MEF into SCID mice. Shown is a haematoxylin and eosin stained teratoma sections containing all three germ layers; ectoderm (neural rosette, n), endoderm (respiratory epithelium, e) and mesoderm (cartilage, c; skeletal muscle, m). Scale bar, 150 μm (a), 100 μm (g,h).
Figure 4hPSC cell adhesion gene expression on DAS-NG.
(a–c) Heat maps of (a) 254 cell adhesion-related genes, (b) selected 19 hPSC-enriched cell adhesion genes and (c) 44 somatic-enriched cell adhesion genes within the hESC-MEF, hiPSC-MEF, hiPSC-DAS/GL and hiPSC-GL. A color bar (top) indicates the color code gene expression in log2 scale. (d–g) qRT–PCR analysis for hPSC-enriched cell adhesion genes (d) MEGF10 and (e) PCDH11X, and somatic-enriched cell adhesion genes (f) COL1A2 and (g) HAPLN1 in hiPSC-DAS/GL, hiPSC-DAS/ITO, hiPSC-DAS/QU and hiPSC-GL relative to hiPSC-MEF. Transcript levels are normalized to GAPDH and represented in the logarithmic scale. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m (n = 3) (d–g).