| Literature DB >> 26846090 |
Yong-fang Ding1,2, Yun-ru Peng3,4, Hong Shen3,4, Luan Shu3,4, Ying-jie Wei3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gualou Xiebai Decoction (GXD) is a well-known traditional Chinese recipe. It has been used to treat cardiovascular disorders for nearly two thousand years. But there is a lack of reports on cardiac fibrosis and underlying mechanism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26846090 PMCID: PMC4743121 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1012-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Effect of GXD on echocardiographical parameters in MI rats. a Representative echocardiography pictures of M mode images. The quantitative data of (b) LV end-diastolic inner diameter (LVID; d); (c) LV end-systolic inner diameter (LVID; s); (d) LV posterior wall thickness in end-diastole (LVWP; d); (e) LV posterior wall thickness in end-systole (LVPW; s); (f) interventricular septal diastolic wall thickness (IVS; d); (g) interventricular septal systolic wall thickness (IVS; s); (h) fractional shortening (FS); (i)ejection fraction (EF); (j) LV end- diastolic volume (LVEDV); (k)end-systolic volume (LVESV). Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 8 for Sham group and n = 12 for other groups). △△ P < 0.01 vs sham group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs MI group
Effect of GXD on hemodynamic parameters and cardiac function induced by coronary artery ligation
| sham | MI | GXDL | GXDH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(beats/min) | 359.6 ± 42.3 | 259.8 ± 29.5△△ | 306.0 ± 55.4* | 333.7 ± 57.2** |
| SBP(mmHg) | 107.1 ± 10.1 | 82.9 ± 7.7△△ | 88.4 ± 7.3 | 99.1 ± 10.2** |
| DBP(mmHg) | 69.93 ± 10.47 | 56.48 ± 8.07△△ | 62.59 ± 5.26* | 67.26 ± 11.65* |
| +LV dp/dtmax(mmHg/s) | 5287.03 ± 1247.53 | 3312.07 ± 859.48△△ | 4062.42 ± 623.19* | 4752.61 ± 930.10** |
| -LV dp/dtmin(mmHg/s) | 4099.12 ± 759.61 | 3005.07 ± 517.25△△ | 3357.75 ± 774.67 | 3822.46 ± 905.39* |
| LVSP(mmHg) | 120.99 ± 10.15 | 88.94 ± 6.86△△ | 95.70 ± 7.57* | 105.24 ± 9.85** |
| LVEDP(mmHg) | −4.57 ± 1.71 | 5.72 ± 1.44△△ | 2.69 ± 0.88** | −0.98 ± 1.70** |
Values are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (n = 8 for Sham group and n = 12 for other groups). HR heart rate, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic pressure, ±LV dp/dt the maximal rates of increase and decrease of left ventricle pressure development, LVSP left ventricular systolic pressure, LVEDP left ventrilcel end dilated pressure. △△ P < 0.01 vs sham group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs MI group
Fig. 2Effect of GXD on myocardial injury and inflammation factors. The quantitative data of (a) aspartate aminotransferase (AST); (b) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB); (c) tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and Interleukin-1beta (IL-1β). Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 8 for Sham group and n = 12 for other groups). △△ P < 0.01 vs sham group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs MI group
Fig. 3Effect of GXD on infarct size. a Representative microphotographs (×100) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H/E). b Histogram of the effect of GXD on infarct size. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 8 for Sham group and n = 12 for other groups). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs MI group
Fig. 4Effect of GXD on inflammatory mediators expression. a Representative Western blotting analysis of myocardial fibrosis tissue. The ratios of various proteins to GAPDH are presented in panels b, c, d. Protein levels were calculated by densitometry. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). △△ P < 0.01 vs sham group; **P < 0.01 vs MI group