Literature DB >> 26845456

Hydrophobicity of biofilm coatings influences the transport dynamics of polystyrene nanoparticles in biofilm-coated sand.

Michael R Mitzel1, Stefanie Sand2, Joann K Whalen3, Nathalie Tufenkji4.   

Abstract

Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) are used in the manufacture of over 2000 industrial and consumer products to enhance their material properties and functions or to enable new nanoparticle-dependent functions. The widespread use of ENPs will result in their release to the subsurface and aquatic environments, where they will interact with indigenous biota. Laboratory column experiments were designed to understand the influence of two different Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on the mobility of polystyrene latex nanoparticles in granular porous media representative of groundwater aquifers or riverbank filtration settings. The transport behavior of 20 nm carboxylate-modified (CLPs) and sulfate (SLPs) polystyrene latex ENPs suspended in NaCl or CaCl2 (1 and 10 mM ionic strength, pH 7) was studied in columns packed with quartz sand coated with biofilms formed by two P. aeruginosa strains that differed in cell surface hydrophobicity (P. aeruginosa 9027™, relatively hydrophilic and P. aeruginosa PAO1, relatively hydrophobic). Biofilm-coated quartz sand retained more of the electrostatically-stabilized latex ENPs than clean, uncoated sand, regardless of the serotype. As IS increased, clear differences in the shape of the ENP breakthrough curves were observed for each type of biofilm coating. ENP breakthrough in the P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm-coated sand was generally constant with time whereby breakthrough in the P. aeruginosa 9027 biofilm-coated sand showed dynamic behavior. This indicates a fundamental difference in the mechanisms of ENP deposition onto hydrophilic or hydrophobic biofilm coatings due to the hydration properties of these biofilms. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of considering the surface properties of aquifer grain coatings when evaluating ENP fate in natural subsurface environments.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Fate; Filtration; Hydrophobicity; Nanoparticle; Transport

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26845456     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

Review 1.  Microbial Fabrication of Nanomaterial and Its Role in Disintegration of Exopolymeric Matrices of Biofilm.

Authors:  Moupriya Nag; Dibyajit Lahiri; Tanmay Sarkar; Sujay Ghosh; Ankita Dey; Hisham Atan Edinur; Siddhartha Pati; Rina Rani Ray
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.221

2.  Characterization of a biofilm-forming Shigella flexneri phenotype due to deficiency in Hep biosynthesis.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Wei Zhang; Bing Zhang; Chongbing Liao; Yongping Shao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Influence of Simplified Microbial Community Biofilms on Bacterial Retention in Porous Media under Conditions of Stormwater Biofiltration.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Yan He; Eric G Sakowski; Sarah P Preheim
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Interaction of Surface-Modified Alumina Nanoparticles and Surfactants at an Oil/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry, Scattering, and Enhanced Oil Recovery Study.

Authors:  Wafaa Al-Shatty; Mario Campana; Shirin Alexander; Andrew R Barron
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 10.383

Review 5.  Interactions of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles with Bacterial Biofilms: Molecular Interactions behind Inhibition and Resistance.

Authors:  Abhayraj S Joshi; Priyanka Singh; Ivan Mijakovic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.