Literature DB >> 26845301

ANIMAL WELFARE FROM MOUSE TO MOOSE--IMPLEMENTING THE PRINCIPLES OF THE 3RS IN WILDLIFE RESEARCH.

Johan Lindsjö1, Åsa Fahlman2, Elin Törnqvist3,4.   

Abstract

The concept of the 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) was originally developed for improving laboratory animal welfare and is well known in biomedical and toxicologic research. The 3Rs have so far gained little attention in wildlife research, and there could be several reasons for this. First, researchers may prioritize the welfare of populations and ecosystems over the welfare of individual animals. The effects of research on individual animals can, however, impact welfare and research quality at group and population levels. Second, researchers may find it difficult to apply the 3Rs to studies of free-living wildlife because of the differences between laboratory and wild animals, species, research environment, and purpose and design of the studies. There are, however, several areas where it is possible to transfer the 3R principles to wildlife research, including replacement with noninvasive research techniques, reduction with optimized experimental design, and refinement with better methods of capture, anesthesia, and handling. Third, researchers may not have been trained in applying the 3Rs in wildlife research. This training is needed since ethics committees, employers, journal publishers, and funding agencies increasingly require researchers to consider the welfare implications of their research. In this paper, we compare the principles of the 3Rs in various research areas to better understand the possibilities and challenges of the 3Rs in wildlife research. We emphasize the importance of applying the 3Rs systematically throughout the research process. Based on experiences from laboratory research, we suggest three key factors to enhance implementation of the 3Rs in wildlife research: 1) organizational structure and management, 2) 3R awareness, and 3) research innovation, validation, and implementation. Finally, we encourage an interdisciplinary approach to incorporate the 3R principles in wildlife research. For improved animal welfare and increased research quality, researchers have moral obligations to include the 3Rs into all research areas, including wildlife research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; Animal welfare; reduction; refinement; replacement; wildlife research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26845301     DOI: 10.7589/52.2S.S65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  13 in total

1.  Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?

Authors:  Sarah M Durant; Rosemary Groom; Bernard Kuloba; Abdoulkarim Samna; Uakendisa Muzuma; Phemelo Gadimang; Rose Mandisodza-Chikerema; Audrey Ipavec; Nicholas Mitchell; Dennis Ikanda; Maurus Msuha
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Puncture versus capture: which stresses animals the most?

Authors:  Xavier Bonnet; Gopal Billy; Margareta Lakušić
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 3.  A Review of Non-Invasive Sampling in Wildlife Disease and Health Research: What's New?

Authors:  Anna-Katarina Schilling; Maria Vittoria Mazzamuto; Claudia Romeo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 4.  Guidelines for Telemetry Studies on Snow Leopards.

Authors:  Örjan Johansson; Shannon Kachel; Byron Weckworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Future trends in measuring physiology in free-living animals.

Authors:  H J Williams; J Ryan Shipley; C Rutz; M Wikelski; M Wilkes; L A Hawkes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: implications for animal welfare.

Authors:  Åsa Fahlman; Johan Lindsjö; Therese Arvén Norling; Petter Kjellander; Erik Olof Ågren; Ulrika Alm Bergvall
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Do bank voles (Myodes glareolus) trapped in live and lethal traps show differences in tick burden?

Authors:  Nicolas De Pelsmaeker; Lars Korslund; Øyvind Steifetten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Out of the laboratory, into the field: perspectives on social, ethical and regulatory challenges in UK wildlife research.

Authors:  Alexandra Palmer; Beth Greenhough
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Protein metabolism and physical fitness are physiological determinants of body condition in Southern European carnivores.

Authors:  Nuno Santos; Mónia Nakamura; Helena Rio-Maior; Francisco Álvares; Jose Ángel Barasona; Luís Miguel Rosalino; Maria João Santos; Margarida Santos-Reis; Pablo Ferreras; Francisco Díaz-Ruiz; Pedro Monterroso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden.

Authors:  Svea Jörgensen; Johan Lindsjö; Elin M Weber; Helena Röcklinsberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.