Literature DB >> 26844613

Correlations Between Radiation Dose in Bone Marrow and Hematological Toxicity in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Comparison of 3DCRT, IMRT, and RapidARC.

Yu Chang1, Zhi-Yong Yang, Gui-Ling Li, Qin Li, Qin Yang, Ji-Quan Fan, Ying-Chao Zhao, Ying-Qiu Song, Gang Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To comparatively evaluate the hematological toxicity (HT) associated with 3 concurrent chemoradiotherapies that are routinely used to treat cervical cancer, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and RapidARC and to establish a new normal tissue complication probability model of bone marrow (BM) to predict HT in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer (N = 100) who received concurrent cisplatin and whole-pelvic radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. Dosimetric parameters (including V10, V20, V30, and V40 and mean doses to the pelvic bone) and HT were analyzed.
RESULTS: The V20, V30, and V40 and mean doses to the BM were lower in the IMRT and RapidARC groups than in the 3DCRT group, and the RapidARC group had higher V10 and V40 and mean values than the IMRT group. The V20, V30, and V40 and the mean dose to the pelvic bone were positively correlated with HT. Generalized linear normal tissue complication probability models of white blood cell (WBC) and absolute neutrophil cell (ANC) nadirs and BM V20 were established as follows: WBC nadir = 3.382 - 4.056 • V20 + 0.295 • baseline of WBC (adjusted R = 0.246, F = 15.847) and ANC nadir = 2.438 - 2.780 • V20 + 0.233 • baseline of ANC (adjusted R = 0.236, F = 16.282).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IMRT results in milder hematological toxicity than either 3DCRT or RapidARC. Dosimetric parameters were associated with the incidence of HT in cervical cancer patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26844613     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  11 in total

1.  Clinical and dosimetric factors associated with the development of hematologic toxicity in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemotherapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Souto-Del Bosque; Miguel Ángel Cervantes-Bonilla; Gerardo Del Carmen Palacios-Saucedo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-08-13

2.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

3.  Dosimetric predictors and Lyman normal tissue complication probability model of hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients with treated with pelvic irradiation.

Authors:  Dandan Wang; Yueju Yin; Qichao Zhou; Zirong Li; Xingmin Ma; Yong Yin; Baosheng Li; Tong Bai; Dapeng Li; Jian Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 4.  Modulating Both Tumor Cell Death and Innate Immunity Is Essential for Improving Radiation Therapy Effectiveness.

Authors:  Qiuji Wu; Awatef Allouch; Isabelle Martins; Catherine Brenner; Nazanine Modjtahedi; Eric Deutsch; Jean-Luc Perfettini
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Dose-volume parameters of MRI-based active bone marrow predict hematologic toxicity of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Łukasz Kuncman; Konrad Stawiski; Michał Masłowski; Jakub Kucharz; Jacek Fijuth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Comparison of survival, acute toxicities, and dose-volume parameters between intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without internal target volume delineation method and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients: A retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Qin Liang; Sen-Quan Feng; Wen-Jia Xie; Qiong-Zhi Jiang; Yan-Fen Yang; Ren Luo; Elizabeth A Kidd; Tian-Tian Zhai; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Dosimetric parameters and absolute monocyte count can predict the prognosis of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Xiang; Zhen Ding; Qi Zeng; Lingling Feng; Chunyan Qiu; Dongjie Chen; Jiawei Lu; Ning Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Outcome and toxicity of radical radiotherapy or concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for elderly cervical cancer women.

Authors:  Weiping Wang; Xiaorong Hou; Junfang Yan; Jie Shen; Xin Lian; Shuai Sun; Zhikai Liu; Qingyu Meng; Dunhuang Wang; Mei Zhao; Jie Qiu; Ke Hu; Fuquan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Correlation between pelvic bone marrow radiation dose and acute hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation.

Authors:  T Kumar; A Schernberg; F Busato; M Laurans; I Fumagalli; I Dumas; E Deutsch; C Haie-Meder; C Chargari
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Automated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Based on Convolution Neural Network.

Authors:  Chen Jihong; Bai Penggang; Zhang Xiuchun; Chen Kaiqiang; Chen Wenjuan; Dai Yitao; Qian Jiewei; Quan Kerun; Zhong Jing; Wu Tianming
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.