Literature DB >> 26844577

Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning.

Gwilym Lockwood1, Mark Dingemanse2, Peter Hagoort1.   

Abstract

The existence of sound-symbolism (or a non-arbitrary link between form and meaning) is well-attested. However, sound-symbolism has mostly been investigated with nonwords in forced choice tasks, neither of which are representative of natural language. This study uses ideophones, which are naturally occurring sound-symbolic words that depict sensory information, to investigate how sensitive Dutch speakers are to sound-symbolism in Japanese in a learning task. Participants were taught 2 sets of Japanese ideophones; 1 set with the ideophones' real meanings in Dutch, the other set with their opposite meanings. In Experiment 1, participants learned the ideophones and their real meanings much better than the ideophones with their opposite meanings. Moreover, despite the learning rounds, participants were still able to guess the real meanings of the ideophones in a 2-alternative forced-choice test after they were informed of the manipulation. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is robust beyond 2-alternative forced-choice paradigms and affects broader language processes such as word learning. In Experiment 2, participants learned regular Japanese adjectives with the same manipulation, and there was no difference between real and opposite conditions. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is especially strong in ideophones, and that people learn words better when form and meaning match. The highlights of this study are as follows: (a) Dutch speakers learn real meanings of Japanese ideophones better than opposite meanings, (b) Dutch speakers accurately guess meanings of Japanese ideophones, (c) this sensitivity happens despite learning some opposite pairings, (d) no such learning effect exists for regular Japanese adjectives, and (e) this shows the importance of sound-symbolism in scaffolding language learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26844577     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  Sound symbolism shapes the English language: The maluma/takete effect in English nouns.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Chris Westbury; Geoff Hollis; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 2.  Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren't languages more iconic?

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Bodo Winter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  The perceived mapping between form and meaning in American Sign Language depends on linguistic knowledge and task: evidence from iconicity and transparency judgments.

Authors:  Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn       Date:  2019-07-12

5.  Describing the sounds of nature: Using onomatopoeia to classify bird calls for citizen science.

Authors:  Kellie Vella; Daniel Johnson; Paul Roe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phonological Iconicity Electrifies: An ERP Study on Affective Sound-to-Meaning Correspondences in German.

Authors:  Susann Ullrich; Sonja A Kotz; David S Schmidtke; Arash Aryani; Markus Conrad
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-18

Review 7.  Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review.

Authors:  Gerardo Ortega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

8.  Sound iconicity of abstract concepts: Place of articulation is implicitly associated with abstract concepts of size and social dominance.

Authors:  Jan Auracher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  To call a cloud 'cirrus': sound symbolism in names for categories or items.

Authors:  Vanja Ković; Jelena Sučević; Suzy J Styles
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Is un stylo sharper than une épée? Investigating the interaction of sound symbolism and grammatical gender in English and French speakers.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman; Jean Saint-Aubin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.