Literature DB >> 2684441

Randomized comparison of outcome after propofol-nitrous oxide or enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in operations of long duration.

K Korttila1, P L Ostman, E Faure, J L Apfelbaum, M Ekdawi, M F Roizen.   

Abstract

A randomized, prospective, comparative study was performed to evaluate induction characteristics, haemodynamic changes and recovery in 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing mainly gynaecological laparotomies with either propofol or thiopentone-enflurane anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 30) received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol infusion. The thiopentone-enflurane group (n = 30) received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by enflurane (0.5-2 per cent). All patients received nitrous oxide (66 per cent] in oxygen begun one minute after tracheal intubation, and fentanyl (1.5 micrograms.kg-1) four minutes prior to induction. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar among the groups. Haemodynamic measurements were similar between propofol and enflurane groups except after tracheal intubation when the mean arterial pressure was lower in the propofol group (P less than 0.05). The propofol group had significantly less (P less than 0.01) emesis in the recovery room than the enflurane group. The propofol group experienced significantly less (P less than 0.05) dizziness, depression/sadness and hunger than the enflurane group in the postoperative period as assessed with a visual analogue questionnaire. We conclude that propofol provided better outcome than enflurane in terms of these nonvital but annoying outcome measures after relatively long intra-abdominal operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2684441     DOI: 10.1007/BF03005416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  15 in total

1.  The antiemetic action of propofol.

Authors:  J S McCollum; K R Milligan; J W Dundee
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Comparison of a total intravenous anaesthetic technique using a propofol infusion, with an inhalational technique using enflurane for day case surgery.

Authors:  M L Price; A Walmsley; C Swaine; J Ponte
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  A postanesthetic recovery score.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; D Kroulik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Comparison of propofol and thiamylal for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia for outpatient surgery.

Authors:  I H Sampson; H Plosker; M Cohen; J A Kaplan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Comparison of methohexitone and propofol ('Diprivan') for induction of enflurane anaesthesia in outpatients.

Authors:  J Valanne; K Korttila
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopental-isoflurane-nitrous oxide for general anesthesia.

Authors:  V A Doze; A Shafer; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Comparison of propofol and thiopentone anaesthesia (with special reference to recovery characteristics).

Authors:  W M Weightman; M Zacharias
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.669

8.  Disposition of propofol in patients undergoing surgery. A comparison in men and women.

Authors:  N H Kay; J W Sear; J Uppington; I D Cockshott; E J Douglas
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Hemodynamic effects of infusions of the emulsion formulation of propofol during nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans.

Authors:  D P Coates; C R Monk; C Prys-Roberts; M Turtle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Disposition kinetics of propofol during alfentanil anaesthesia.

Authors:  E Gepts; K Jonckheer; V Maes; W Sonck; F Camu
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rapid attainment of steady state plasma drug concentrations within precise limits.

Authors:  B Korman; L S Jennings; J R Rigg
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-06

Review 2.  Propofol: a sedative-hypnotic anesthetic agent for use in ambulatory procedures.

Authors:  D M Steinbacher
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Practical treatment recommendations for the safe use of anaesthetics.

Authors:  J W Sear
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Anesthetic drugs modulate feeding behavior and hypothalamic expression of the POMC polypeptide precursor and the NPY neuropeptide.

Authors:  E Besnier; T Clavier; M C Tonon; G Pelletier; B Dureuil; H Castel; V Compère
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.