| Literature DB >> 26844152 |
Shivam Kothari1, Danielle Kruse2, Roxanne Karimi3, Susan Silbernagel4, Nurcan Gursoy5, Raja Jaber6, Heidi Roppelt7, Rina Awan8, Avram Gold8, Jaymie R Meliker9.
Abstract
We investigated the association between seafood consumption and symptoms related to potential mercury toxicity in patients presenting to specialty medical clinics at Stony Brook Medical Center on Long Island, New York. We surveyed 118 patients from April-August 2012 about their seafood consumption patterns, specifically how frequently they were eating each type of fish, to assess mercury exposure. We also asked about symptoms associated with mercury toxicity including depression, fatigue, balance difficulties, or tingling around the mouth. Of the 118 adults surveyed, 14 consumed high mercury seafood (tuna steak, marlin, swordfish, or shark) at least weekly. This group was more likely to suffer from fatigue than other patients (p = 0.02). Logistic regression confirmed this association of fatigue with frequent high mercury fish consumption in both unadjusted analysis (OR = 5.53; 95% CI: 1.40-21.90) and analysis adjusted for age, race, sex, income, and clinic type (OR = 7.89; 95% CI: 1.63-38.15). No associations were observed between fish intake and depression, balance difficulties, or tingling around the mouth. Findings suggest that fatigue may be associated with eating high mercury fish but sample size is small. Larger studies are needed to determine whether fish intake patterns or blood mercury tests warrant consideration as part of the clinical work-up in coastal regions.Entities:
Keywords: Coastal population; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; Fish consumption; Hg, Mercury; MeHg, Organic mercury = methylmercury; Mercury exposure; Mercury toxicity; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Sleep medicine; USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Year: 2015 PMID: 26844152 PMCID: PMC4721310 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med Rep ISSN: 2211-3355
Fig. 1Screening survey used to determine the need for a blood Hg test. We recommended that physicians order a blood Hg test if the response was in the gray shaded region, or if there were a total of six checkmarks in any region. The version that the patients completed did not include a shaded region.
Symptoms of subjects at Stony Brook University clinics, Long Island, New York, Summer 2012, among those with and without weekly consumption of high Hg fish.
| Overall (n = 118) | > Weekly consumption of high Hg Fish (n = 14) | < Weekly consumption of high Hg Fish (n = 104) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trouble with balance | 54 (46%) | 7 (50%) | 47 (45%) | 0.78 |
| Tingling around the mouth | 18 (15%) | 4 (29%) | 14 (13%) | 0.23 |
| At least moderate depression | 19 (16%) | 3 (21%) | 16 (15%) | 0.70 |
| Fatigue | 41 (35%) | 9 (64%) | 32 (31%) | 0.02 |
p values were calculated using Fisher's exact test.
p < 0.05.
Weekly consumption of high Hg fish includes tuna steak/tuna sushi, marlin, shark, swordfish, mackerel, or tilefish.
Demographics of the participating patients in the specialty clinics at Stony Brook University, Long Island, New York, Summer, 2012.
| Integrative Medicine (n = 41) | Neurology (n = 40) | Rheumatology (n = 24) | Sleep Disorders (n = 13) | Overall (n = 118) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) — mean (SD) | 57.1 (19.5) | 52.3 (16.6) | 51.3 (13.2) | 57.8 (15.5) | 54.7 (16.9) | 0.48 |
| 12–40 | 7 (17%) | 7 (17%) | 4 (17%) | 2 (15%) | 20 (17%) | |
| 41–55 | 7 (17%) | 16 (40%) | 10 (42%) | 4 (31%) | 37 (31%) | |
| 56–70 | 14 (34%) | 12 (30%) | 9 (37%) | 6 (46%) | 41 (35%) | |
| 71–90 | 13 (32%) | 4 (10%) | 1 (4%) | 1 (8%) | 19 (16%) | |
| Sex | 0.35 | |||||
| Female | 31 (76%) | 32 (80%) | 15 (63%) | 8 (62%) | 86 (73%) | |
| Male | 10 (24%) | 8 (20%) | 9 (37%) | 5 (38%) | 32 (27%) | |
| Race | 0.05 | |||||
| Caucasian | 34 (83%) | 32 (80%) | 12 (50%) | 11 (85%) | 89 (75%) | |
| African American | 1 (2%) | 4 (10%) | 3 (12.5%) | 1 (8%) | 9 (8%) | |
| Hispanic | 2 (5%) | 2 (5%) | 7 (29%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (9%) | |
| Asian American | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4%) | 1 (8%) | 3 (3%) | |
| Other | 3 (7%) | 2 (5%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (5%) | |
| Income ($US) | 0.26 | |||||
| < 25,000 | 8 (20%) | 4 (10%) | 6 (25%) | 5 (38%) | 23 (19%) | |
| 25,000–70,000 | 8 (20%) | 9 (23%) | 5 (21%) | 3 (23%) | 25 (21%) | |
| 70,000–110,000 | 10 (24%) | 13 (33%) | 6 (25%) | 3 (23%) | 32 (27%) | |
| 110,000–200,000 | 8 (20%) | 5 (13%) | 4 (17%) | 4 (31%) | 21 (18%) | |
| > 200,000 | 3 (7%) | 5 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (7%) |
p-value represents results of ANOVA between the specialty clinics.
Fish consumption frequency of patients at Stony Brook University, Long Island, New York, Summer 2012.
| Mahaffey et al., 2009 nationwide data for women (n = 5120) | Overall (n = 118) | Integrative Medicine (n = 41) | Neurology (n = 40) | Rheumatology (n = 24) | Sleep Disorders (n = 13) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None/hardly ever | 1220 (24%) | 4 (3%) | 1 (2%) | 1 (3%) | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) |
| 1–2 times/month | 1470 (29%) | 18 (15%) | 7 (17%) | 9 (23%) | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) |
| 1–2 times/week | 1917 (37%) | 44 (37%) | 15 (37%) | 13 (32%) | 8 (33%) | 8 (62%) |
| 3 times/week | 301 (6%) | 23 (19%) | 8 (20%) | 7 (17%) | 6 (25%) | 2 (15%) |
| 4 times/week | 212 (4%) | 29 (25%) | 10 (24%) | 10 (25%) | 6 (25%) | 3 (23%) |
ANOVA of the Mahaffey reported fish consumption and our overall numbers, p-value < 0.0001.
ANOVA between our specialty clinics, p-value = 0.94.