Literature DB >> 26844053

High school females and those with other vaccinations most likely to complete the Human Papillomavirus vaccine.

Deanna Kepka1, Qian Ding2, Echo L Warner1, Michael G Spigarelli3, Kathi Mooney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Adolescent females' HPV vaccine completion in the U.S. is low. More recent research is needed to investigate factors that relate to HPV vaccine completion among female adolescents in the United States.
METHODS: Provider-validated data from the 2012 National Immunization Survey-Teen for females ages 13-17 years (N = 9058) were analyzed from February-May 2014 using survey sample weighted statistics. A multivariable Poisson regression estimated prevalence ratios (PR) for factors influencing HPV vaccine completion: mother's education, poverty status, adolescent's grade, facility type, and receipt of other adolescent vaccinations.
RESULTS: In multivariable models, 9-12th grade daughters were more likely to complete HPV vaccination than 6-8th grade daughters (PR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.58-2.06). Those seen in hospital facilities completed HPV vaccination 1.3 times more (PR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.62) and those seen in private facilities were 1.2 times more likely to complete (PR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.01-1.48), than those seen in public facilities, respectively. Compared to those without recommended adolescent vaccinations, receipt of seasonal influenza vaccination related to HPV vaccine completion (PR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.54-1.89), as did receipt of TDAP vaccination (PR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03-1.33) and Meningitis vaccination (PR = 2.74, 95% CI = 2.20-3.42).
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent females in high school, seen in private/hospital facilities, and up to date on other recommended adolescent vaccinations are most likely to complete the HPV vaccine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dose completion; Cervical cancer; Females; HPV vaccine

Year:  2015        PMID: 26844053      PMCID: PMC4721356          DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med Rep        ISSN: 2211-3355


Background

The Healthy People 2020 HPV vaccination goal among females is 80% (Healthy People, 2020 Topics & Objectives: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014). In 2012, 33.4% of eligible adolescents have completed HPV vaccination in the United States (U.S.), with variation among states (Mississippi = 12.1% to Rhode Island = 57.7%) (2012 NIS-Teen Vaccination Coverage Table Data: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014). In 2010, minority race adolescents were more likely to initiate the HPV vaccine, (Laz et al., 2012) but less likely to complete the series (Niccolai et al., 2011, Reiter et al., 2014). In 2009, older adolescents were less likely to complete HPV vaccination than younger patients (Hirth et al., 2012). Those living below poverty level are less likely to complete HPV vaccination (Niccolai et al., 2011). Research is needed to provide updated data on factors influencing HPV vaccine completion. This is one of the first studies of 2012 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) data to investigate HPV vaccine completion factors among female adolescents in the U.S. Those individuals whose mother had lower education, living below poverty level, of racial or ethnic minority, younger adolescents, and receiving the vaccine at private facilities, or from a Vaccine for Children provider were hypothesized to have lower completion of the HPV vaccine. Individuals with other adolescent vaccinations were expected to be more likely to complete the HPV vaccine than those without other vaccines.

Methods

This secondary data analysis occurred from February–May 2014 and utilized the 2012 NIS-Teen survey, a publicly available, nationally representative survey with a complex sampling design described elsewhere (Jain et al., 2009). Annually, the NIS-Teen uses random digit dialing to sample parents and adolescent health care providers through a telephone and mailed survey, respectively. These data assess adolescent vaccination coverage among 13–17 year olds in the U.S. The 2012 NIS-Teen had a cellular-household response rate of 23.6%, and a landline-household response rate of 55.1% (National State Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years — United States, 2012, 2014). Analysis of publicly available data is considered exempt research by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board. The Andersen healthcare utilization model guided the selection of factors examined in this study. Health services use is determined by three components: predisposing factors, enabling factors, and need. Predisposing factors include patient and caregiver/parent demographics (e.g., age, education, marital status, race, and income). Enabling factors include access to insurance, provider access to vaccinations, and access to other adolescent immunizations. Need includes perceived need for healthcare services which may relate to parent prioritization of other recommended adolescent vaccinations (Anderson, 1995).

Participants

Parents consented to have their adolescent's provider contacted to verify vaccine receipt (About the National Immunization Survey: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014). Female adolescents with provider-verified immunization records were included in the analysis (N = 9058).

Outcome measures

The outcome of interest was completion of the 3-dose HPV vaccine series. After phone interviews were conducted with parents or guardians, providers were mailed a questionnaire to acquire provider-confirmed immunization information for receipt of 3 doses of the vaccine (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years — United States, 2013). Participants with provider verified receipt of three doses were considered to have completed the vaccine. Variable weights selected adjust for respondents with missing provider data.

Statistical analysis

Provider-phase sampling weight for both landline and cell-phone samples in the U.S. proper was used to produce Dual-Frame point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Missing values of each variable were excluded. Frequency counts, percents, and 95% CI, each properly weighted by survey sampling weights, were reported for the total sample and HPV vaccine completion subgroup. For categorical variables, a survey weighted Pearson chi-square test was used to compare distributions between those with HPV vaccine completion to those with less than 3 doses. A survey weighted multivariable Poisson regression was fitted to assess the impact of selected predictors and reported as an adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% CI. All tests were two-sided comparisons in STATA version 13.1 (College Station, Texas).

Results

There were 9058 respondents with provider-verified vaccination records and daughters ages 13–17 years. Of these, 3246 had completed the HPV vaccine series. In Table 1, mothers were mostly aged ≥ 35, college graduates, and married. Adolescents were primarily living above poverty level, Non-Hispanic White, 9th–12th grade, and on private health insurance. In bivariate analyses of female adolescent characteristics, comparing those who had completed the HPV vaccine to those who had not, demographic factors related to HPV vaccine completion included: mother's education, poverty status, and adolescent's current grade, all p < 0.05. Healthcare factors associated with HPV vaccine completion included facility type for adolescent's providers and completion of other recommended adolescent vaccinations (i.e., influenza, TDAP, Meningitis), all p < 0.05.
Table 1

Bivariate analysis of female respondent characteristics: full sample and those with HPV completiona, b. Bold indicates statistically significant p-values that are less than p=0.05.

Total (N = 9058)%c (95% CI)HPV completiond (N = 3246)%c (95% CI)p-Valuee
Age (mother)0.738
 ≤ 34 years67110.0 (8.8, 11.4)21710.4 (8.1, 13.2)
 35–44 years370945.3 (43.5, 47.2)130444.2 (41.1, 47.4)
 ≥ 45 years467844.6 (42.8, 46.5)172545.4 (42.3, 48.5)
Education (mother)0.007
 < 12 years90514.3 (12.8, 15.9)35216.7 (14.0, 19.7)
 12 years172324.0 (22.4, 25.8)61523.7 (21.1, 26.5)
 > 12 years (some college)254727.8 (26.1, 29.5)83624.1 (21.6, 26.8)
 College graduate388333.9 (32.3, 35.6)144335.5 (32.7, 38.5)
Poverty status0.048
 Above poverty (>$75 k)394333.4 (31.8, 35.1)147234.4 (31.6, 37.3)
 Above poverty (≤$75 k)333539.2 (37.3, 41.0)110135.9 (32.9, 39.1)
 Below poverty151527.4 (25.6, 29.4)58729.7 (26.5, 33.0)
 Missing, n (%)265 (2.93)86 (2.65)
Marital status (mother)0.944
 Married669164.0 (62.1, 65.9)235464.1 (60.9, 67.1)
 Other236736.0 (34.1, 37.9)89235.9 (32.9, 39.1)
Adolescent's race/ethnicity0.262
 Hispanic123121.8 (20.1, 23.7)45523.2 (20.2, 26.5)
 Non-Hispanic White only605854.2 (52.4, 56.1)215154.7 (51.5, 57.8)
 Non-Hispanic Black only89914.2 (12.9, 15.7)30612.3 (10.4, 14.6)
 Other8709.7 (8.6, 11.0)3349.8 (8.0, 11.9)
Adolescent's current grade0.001
 6th to 8th grade251127.1 (25.5, 28.7)59018.0 (15.8, 20.5)
 9th to 12th grade644171.5 (69.8, 73.1)261580.9 (78.5, 83.2)
 HS graduate/GED1061.4 (1.0, 2.1)411.0 (0.6, 1.7)
Adolescent's health insurance0.475
 Employment/union592856.6 (54.7, 58.5)210255.6 (52.4, 58.8)
 Other305443.4 (41.5, 45.3)111844.4 (41.2, 47.6)
 Missing, n (%)76 (0.84)26 (0.80)
Facility type for adolescent's providers0.001
 All public facilities127015.5 (14.1, 17.0)36712.1 (10.0, 14.5)
 All hospital facilities7937.4 (6.5, 8.3)3378.1 (6.6, 9.8)
 All private facilities421350.8 (49.0, 52.7)156755.4 (52.2, 58.6)
 Mixed/other242726.3 (24.7, 28.0)86124.5 (21.9, 27.3)
 Missing, n (%)355 (3.92)114 (3.51)
Do adolescent's providers order vaccinations from state/local health department0.052
 All providers598864.5(62.6, 66.3)223267.3 (64.2, 70.2)
 Some but possibly not all130914.0 (12.8, 15.4)46613.9 (11.8, 16.4)
 No providers100811.7 (10.6, 12.9)31611.0 (9.3, 12.9)
 Don't know7289.8 (8.6, 11.2)2327.9 (6.3, 9.7)
 Missing, n (%)25 (0.28)
Influenza vaccinationf0.001
 Yes385038.9 (37.2, 40.7)188756.0 (52.8, 59.1)
 No520861.1 (59.3, 62.8)135944.0 (40.9, 47.2)
TDAP vaccinationg0.001
 Yes608565.0 (63.2, 66.8)246572.4 (69.2, 75.4)
 No297335.0 (33.2, 36.9)78127.6 (24.7, 30.7)
Meningitis vaccinationh0.001
 Yes665773.5 (71.7, 75.1)291690.7 (88.5, 92.4)
 No240126.5 (24.9, 28.3)3309.3 (7.6, 11.5)

Respondents from the Virgin Islands were excluded.

Female adolescents in the U.S. with adequately complete provider-reported immunization records in the 2012 NIS-Teen survey were included in the analysis.

Weighted percentages from Dual-Frame Sampling Weights.

HPV completion includes those who had received at least 3 doses of the HPV vaccine.

Survey weighted Pearson chi-square test compared those with HPV vaccine completion to those who did not receive 3 doses.

Adolescent has taken at least one dose of seasonal influenza vaccination in the past three years.

Adolescent has taken at least one dose of TDAP only vaccination since age 10 years old and before 13 years old.

Adolescent has taken at least one dose of Meningitis vaccination.

Multivariable analysis of factors predicting HPV vaccine completion among female adolescents

In Table 2, respondents whose mothers had some college, but no college degree, were less likely to complete the HPV vaccine than those whose mothers had less than 12 years of education (PR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67–0.99, p = 0.036). Daughters in 9–12th grade were 1.8 times more likely to have completed HPV vaccination than those in 6–8th grade (PR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.58–2.07, p < 0.001). Female adolescents who were seen in hospital facilities were 1.3 times more likely to complete (PR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.01–1.61, p = 0.037) and those seen in private facilities were 1.2 times more likely to complete (PR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.00–1.45, p = 0.050), compared to those seen in public facilities.
Table 2

Multivariable analysis of factors predicting HPV vaccine completion among female adolescents, NIS-Teen 2012a.

Adjusted vaccination coverageb% (95% CI)Prevalence ratioc (95% CI)
Age (mother)
 ≤ 34 years37.8 (30.0, 45.6)Reference
 35–44 years33.4 (30.7, 36.1)0.88 (0.71, 1.10)
 ≥ 45 years32.9 (30.4, 35.3)0.87 (0.70, 1.09)
Education (mother)
 < 12 years38.0 (32.0, 44.1)Reference
 12 years34.3 (30.4, 38.1)0.90 (0.75, 1.09)
 > 12 years (some college)30.9 (27.7, 34.0)0.81 (0.67,0.99)
 College graduate33.4 (30.3, 36.6)0.88 (0.72, 1.07)
Poverty status
 Above poverty (>$75 k)32.9 (29.6, 36.1)Reference
 Above poverty (<=$75 k)32.9 (30.1, 35.7)1.00 (0.88, 1.13)
 Below poverty35.4 (31.0, 39.9)1.08 (0.90, 1.29)
Marital status (mother)
 Married32.9 (30.6, 35.2)Reference
 Other34.8 (31.4, 38.2)1.06 (0.93, 1.20)
Adolescent's race/ethnicity
 Hispanic33.0 (28.4, 37.6)Reference
 Non-Hispanic White only35.8 (33.4, 38.1)1.08 (0.93, 1.27)
 Non-Hispanic Black only28.1 (23.4, 32.8)0.85 (0.69, 1.06)
 Other31.8 (26.7, 36.8)0.96 (0.78, 1.19)
Adolescent's current grade
 6th to 8th grade21.3 (18.7, 24.0)Reference
 9th to 12th grade38.6 (36.3, 40.8)1.81 (1.58, 2.07)
 HS graduate/GED32.7 (15.6, 49.8)1.53 (0.90, 2.62)
Adolescent's health insurance
 Employment/union32.8 (30.2, 35.4)Reference
 Other34.6 (31.6, 37.7)1.06 (0.93, 1.20)
Facility type for adolescent's providers
 All public facilities28.8 (23.9, 33.7)Reference
 All hospital facilities36.8 (31.0, 42.6)1.28 (1.01, 1.61)
 All private facilities34.7 (32.1, 37.4)1.21 (1.00, 1.45)
 Other32.9 (29.2, 36.5)1.14 (0.93, 1.40)
Do adolescent's providers order vaccinations from state/local health department
 All providers34.6 (32.5, 36.8)Reference
 Some but possibly not all29.9 (24.9, 34.9)0.86 (0.72, 1.04)
 No providers35.0 (30.1, 40.0)1.01 (0.87, 1.18)
 Don't know28.6 (22.5, 34.6)0.82 (0.66, 1.03)
Influenza vaccinationd
 Yes44.1 (41.3, 46.9)1.71 (1.54, 1.90)
 No25.8 (23.6, 28.1)Reference
TDAP vaccinatione
 Yes35.3 (33.1, 37.4)1.18 (1.04, 1.35)
 No29.8 (26.4, 33.3)Reference
Meningitis vaccinationf
 Yes39.1 (36.9, 41.3)2.75 (2.20, 3.42)
 No14.2 (11.2, 17.2)Reference

Respondents from the Virgin Islands were excluded as were those with missing values (N = 8388). Female adolescents in the U.S. with adequately complete provider-reported immunization records in the 2012 NIS-Teen survey were included in the analysis.

Multivariable Poisson regression.

Predictive marginal prevalence.

Adolescent has taken at least one dose of seasonal influenza vaccination in the past three years.

Adolescent has taken at least one dose of TDAP only vaccination since age 10 years old and before 13 years old.

Adolescent has taken at least one dose of Meningitis vaccination.

Similar to the bivariate analyses, receipt of other adolescent vaccinations increased the likelihood of HPV vaccine completion. Those with at least one dose of seasonal influenza vaccination in the past three years were 1.7 times more likely to complete HPV vaccination (PR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.54–1.90, p < 0.001) than those without influenza vaccination. Adolescents with at least one dose of TDAP vaccination ages 10–13 years were 1.2 times more likely to complete HPV vaccination (PR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04–1.35, p = 0.012) than those who had not received TDAP. Adolescents with at least one Meningitis vaccination were 2.7 times more likely to complete HPV vaccination than those without a Meningitis vaccination (PR = 2.75, 95% CI = 2.20–3.42, p < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses, a multivariable model was used to investigate factors related to females who received three doses of the HPV vaccine among those who had a minimum of 24 weeks between the receipt of the first dose of the HPV vaccine and the date of the interview (n = 4548). Females in higher grades were more likely to complete the 3-dose HPV vaccine series than females in 6th–8th grades (p < .001). Females attending private facilities compared to public facilities (p < .01), and females with the flu and TDAP vaccines (both p < .05) were also more likely to complete the 3-dose series within the recommended time frame (data not shown).

Discussion

Prevalence of HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 have declined over 50% following HPV vaccine introduction among girls ages 14–19 in the U.S., yet national immunization rates are far below the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% completion among adolescent females (Healthy People 2020 Topics and Objectives: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014, Accelerating HPV Vaccine Uptake: Urgency for Action to Prevent Cancer. A Report to the President of the United States from the President's Cancer Panel. Bethesda MD: National Cancer Institute, 2014). To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine factors related to HPV vaccine completion using the 2012 NIS-Teen survey. The ACIP has recommended that females ages 11–12 are to receive three doses of the HPV vaccine since 2006 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR 2007). These results indicate that adolescent females are not receiving the HPV vaccine at recommended ages. Despite parental concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, (Markowitz et al., 2007, Oldach and Katz, 2012) clinical trial data and safety monitoring by the CDC, FDA and vaccine manufacturers indicate that the vaccine is highly safe and risk for serious reaction to the HPV vaccine is extremely rare (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13–17Years — United States, 2013, Kepka et al., 2014, Gee et al., 2011, Chao et al., 2012, Klein et al., 2012). HPV vaccine administration is optimal during this age, when adolescents have the best immune response to the vaccination (Accelerating HPV Vaccine Uptake: Urgency for Action to Prevent Cancer. A Report to the President of the United States from the President's Cancer Panel.). Providers and parents need to recognize the full-panel of recommended adolescent vaccinations and improve primary care by adhering to recommended vaccine schedules. Future studies are needed to investigate the importance of pairing HPV vaccination with other recommended adolescent immunizations, encouraging providers to make strong recommendations for the receipt of HPV vaccination, and clinic-based parent and patient reminder systems for 3-dose series completion.

Limitations

This study is limited by non-response among the NIS-Teen sample, with adequate provider-verified vaccination data available among only 56.4% of cellular and 62% of landline respondents. After weighting adjustments, bias may persist (National State Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years — United States, 2012, 2014). Lastly, only one multivariable regression model was included in our analyses.

Conclusions

Future development of multifaceted, comprehensive strategies to improve clinical recommendation and administration of the HPV vaccine series is needed, including: strong and consistent provider recommendations, use of electronic health records and information systems to incorporate reminder systems for adolescents who are due for HPV vaccination, and policies that ensure adequate provider reimbursement for administration of the HPV vaccine series (Accelerating HPV Vaccine Uptake: Urgency for Action to Prevent Cancer. A Report to the President of the United States from the President's Cancer Panel). Moreover, community outreach and education promoting HPV vaccination as a cancer prevention method, and addressing adolescents' and caregivers' concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, may also improve the uptake of the HPV vaccine.

Conflict of interest/financial disclosure statement

No conflicts of interest or financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
  13 in total

1.  Surveillance of autoimmune conditions following routine use of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine.

Authors:  C Chao; N P Klein; C M Velicer; L S Sy; J M Slezak; H Takhar; B Ackerson; T C Cheetham; J Hansen; K Deosaransingh; M Emery; K-L Liaw; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Determining accurate vaccination coverage rates for adolescents: the National Immunization Survey-Teen 2006.

Authors:  Nidhi Jain; James A Singleton; Margrethe Montgomery; Benjamin Skalland
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine administered routinely to females.

Authors:  Nicola P Klein; John Hansen; Chun Chao; Christine Velicer; Michael Emery; Jeff Slezak; Ned Lewis; Kamala Deosaransingh; Lina Sy; Bradley Ackerson; T Craig Cheetham; Kai-Li Liaw; Harpreet Takhar; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-12

4.  Provider-verified HPV vaccine coverage among a national sample of Hispanic adolescent females.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Kunal Gupta; Noel T Brewer; Melissa B Gilkey; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine knowledge among Latino parents in Utah.

Authors:  Deanna Kepka; Echo L Warner; Anita Y Kinney; Michael G Spigarelli; Kathi Mooney
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-02

6.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

7.  Monitoring the safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: findings from the Vaccine Safety Datalink.

Authors:  Julianne Gee; Allison Naleway; Irene Shui; James Baggs; Ruihua Yin; Rong Li; Martin Kulldorff; Edwin Lewis; Bruce Fireman; Matthew F Daley; Nicola P Klein; Eric S Weintraub
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Completion of the human papillomavirus vaccine series among insured females between 2006 and 2009.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Hirth; Alai Tan; Gregg S Wilkinson; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  An update on human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among 11-17 year old girls in the United States: National Health Interview Survey, 2010.

Authors:  Tabassum H Laz; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2013.

Authors:  Laurie D Elam-Evans; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; James A Singleton; Robinette C Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Susan Hariri
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors associated with parental reasons for "no-intent" to vaccinate female adolescents with human papillomavirus vaccine: National Immunization Survey - Teen 2008-2012.

Authors:  Vinay K Cheruvu; Madhav P Bhatta; Lauren N Drinkard
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.125

2.  White, affluent, educated parents are least likely to choose HPV vaccination for their children: a cross-sectional study of the National Immunization Study - teen.

Authors:  Echo L Warner; Qian Ding; Lisa M Pappas; Kevin Henry; Deanna Kepka
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.125

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.