| Literature DB >> 26843906 |
Elena Azzini1, Giuseppe Maiani1, Ivana Garaguso1, Angela Polito1, Maria S Foddai1, Eugenia Venneria1, Alessandra Durazzo1, Federica Intorre1, Lara Palomba1, Maria L Rauseo1, Ginevra Lombardi-Boccia1, Fabio Nobili1.
Abstract
Phytochemicals can exert their bioactivity without reaching the systemic circulation; scarcely absorbed antioxidants might reach the large bowel contributing to protection from oxidative damage-induced gastrointestinal diseases. In the present work, we aimed to study the relationship between potential activity of polyphenol-rich extracts from Cichorium intybus L. and changes in morphological characteristics on Caco-2 cells. Phytochemicals content (carotenoids and flavonoids) and total antioxidant activity of Red Chicory of Treviso and Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco were evaluated. The bioactivity of polyphenol-rich extracts from chicories was studied in in vitro Caco-2 cell monolayers model. Morphological characteristics changes to test the antioxidant and/or prooxidant effect were verified by histological analysis and observed by Electronic Scansion Microscopy (SEM). On Caco-2 cell model, the polyphenols fractions from chicories have indicated a moderate antioxidant behavior until 17 μM concentration, while 70 μM and 34 μM exert cytotoxic effects for Treviso's and Castelfranco's Chicory, respectively, highlighted by TEER decreasing, increased permeability, and alteration of epithelium. Our findings support the beneficial effects of these products in counteracting the oxidative stress and cellular damage, induced in vitro on Caco-2 cell model, through interaction with the mucopolysaccharide complexes in the glycocalyx, maintaining in vivo a healthy and effective intestinal barrier.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26843906 PMCID: PMC4710941 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1594616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Representative HPLC-ECD gradient array chromatograms of polyphenol-rich extracts analyzed under specified conditions from Red Chicory of Treviso and Variegated of Castelfranco extracts.
Flavonoid identification from Red Chicory of Treviso and Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco extracts.
| Peak analyte | Red Chicory of Treviso | Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT (min) | Dominant channel | Ratio accuracy | RT (min) | Dominant channel | Ratio accuracy | |
| Quercetin | 51.26 | 637 nA | 0.925 | 51.19 | 22.7 nA | 0.947 |
| Kaempferol | 53.28 | 174 nA | 0.800 | 53.13 | 123 nA | 0.807 |
| Apigenin | 55.61 | 37.3 nA | 55.52 | 36.4 nA | ||
Flavonoids content amongst different varieties by growing locations (mg/kg).
| Quercetin (mg/kg) | Kaempferol (mg/kg) | Apigenin (mg/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Zero Branco | 83.92 ± 15.08 | 21.43 ± 2.19 | 2.10 ± 0.61 |
| Scorzè | 95.89 ± 26.51 | 26.23 ± 10.48 | 3.24 ± 0.82 |
| Quinto | 90.31 ± 33.9 | 20.94 ± 4.86 | 3.05 ± 1.12 |
|
| |||
| 90.04 ± 25.16a | 22.80 ± 5.84a | 2.80 ± 0.85 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Zero Branco | 101.50 ± 40.20 | 14.42 ± 8.40 | 3.98 ± 1.81 |
| Scorzè | 100.23 ± 42.4 | 14.51 ± 9.80 | 1.51 ± 0.80 |
| Quinto | 91.89 ± 29.22 | 8.11 ± 5.38 | 2.30 ± 1.60 |
|
| |||
| 97.88 ± 33.94a | 12.35 ± 7.65b | 2.60 ± 1.40 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Monselice | 15.32 ± 3.54 | 8.68 ± 2.16 | 3.33 ± 0.44 |
| Mira | 14.47 ± 4.92 | 13.5 ± 3.81 | 3.78 ± 0.38 |
| Due Carrare | 12.8 ± 5.08 | 13.21 ± 4.97 | 3.62 ± 0.05 |
|
| |||
| 14.20 ± 4.51b | 11.80 ± 3.64b | 3.58 ± 0.29 | |
ANOVA: P < 0.05 a versus b by column.
Carotenoids (lutein and β-carotene) means values (mg/kg) by different cultivars of Chicorium intybus L. and by production area.
| Lutein |
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Zero Branco | 1.27 ± 0.17 | 0.27 ± 0.06 |
| Scorzè | 1.19 ± 0.24 | 0.20 ± 0.01 |
| Quinto | 1.41 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.02 |
|
| ||
| 1.27 ± 0.20b | 0.22 ± 0.04b | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Zero Branco | 2.12 ± 0.89 | 0.45 ± 0.02 |
| Scorzè | 1.97 ± 0.11 | 0.35 ± 0.01 |
| Quinto | 2.40 ± 0.61 | 0.34 ± 0.09 |
|
| ||
| 2.16 ± 0.28a | 0.38 ± 0.08a | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Monselice | 1.28 ± 0.13 | 0.48 ± 0.15 |
| Mira | 1.26 ± 0.36 | 0.35 ± 0.11 |
| Due Carrare | 1.07 ± 0.4 | 0.23 ± 0.01 |
|
| ||
| 1.20 ± 0.27b | 0.35 ± 0.14ab | |
ANOVA: P < 0.05 a versus b by column.
Figure 2Total antioxidant capacity: FRAP (mmol/kg) and TEAC (mmol trolox/kg) values by different cultivars of Cichorium intybus L.
Figure 3TEER changes at different concentration of polyphenol extract: (a) Red Chicory of Treviso (RT) and (b) Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco (VC) polyphenol extract.
Figure 4Histological analysis (a) and scanning electron micrographs (b) of normal Caco-2 pattern treated with polyphenolics extract of Treviso Red (17 μM).
Figure 5Histological analysis (a) and scanning electron micrographs (b) of normal Caco-2 pattern treated with polyphenolics extract of Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco (17 μM).
Figure 6Histological analysis (a) and scanning electron micrographs (b) showing Caco-2 necrotic pattern upon treatment with polyphenolics extract: Treviso Red extract (70 μM).
Figure 7Histological analysis (a) and scanning electron micrographs (b) showing Caco-2 necrotic pattern upon treatment with polyphenolics extract: Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco extract (34 μM).
Figure 8TEER changes at different concentration of polyphenol-rich extract after AAPH-induced oxidative stress. (a) Red Chicory of Treviso (RT) extract and (b) Variegated Chicory of Castelfranco (VC) polyphenol extract.