| Literature DB >> 26843877 |
Abbas Abbaszadegan1, Ahmad Gholami2, Yasamin Ghahramani1, Razieh Ghareghan3, Marzieh Ghareghan3, Aboozar Kazemi2, Aida Iraji4, Younes Ghasemi2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were i) to define the chemical constituents of Cuminum cyminum (cumin) essential oil, ii) to compare the antimicrobial activity of this oil to that of chlorhexidine (CHX) and co-trimoxazole on planktonic and biofilm forms of bacteria isolated from the teeth with persistent endodontic infection and iii ) to compare the cytotoxicity of these medicaments on L929 fibroblasts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three groups of microorganisms [aerobic bacterial mixture, anaerobic bacterial mixture and Enterococcus faecalis (E .faecalis)] were isolated from the teeth with persistent apical periodontitis. Zone of inhibition (ZOI), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and time-kill tests were performed to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of the medicaments. Further, a cytocompatibility analysis of the medicaments was performed on L929 fibroblasts. The results obtained from disc diffusion test and mean cell viability values of the experimental medicaments were analyzed using two-way and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial Activity; Chlorhexidine; Co-trimoxazole; Cuminum Cyminum; Cytotoxicity; Intracanal Medicament
Year: 2015 PMID: 26843877 PMCID: PMC4731533 DOI: 10.7508/iej.2016.01.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Endod J ISSN: 1735-7497
Chemical composition of Cuminum cyminum
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Cuminaldehyde | 23.18 |
|
| 20.47 |
|
| 17.35 |
|
| 13.31 |
|
| 12.47 |
|
| 6.17 |
| 1,3-Cyclohexadiene-1-methanol | 1.79 |
| Myrcene | 0.96 |
| Sabinene | 0.85 |
|
| 0.85 |
|
| 0.76 |
| a-Phellandrene | 0.47 |
| Mentha-1,4-dien-7-ol-p | 0.42 |
| 3,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)- | 0.38 |
|
| 0.29 |
| (E)- | 0.28 |
Mean (SD) of antibacterial activity of cumin, chlorhexidine and co-trimoxazole. Different letters show the significant difference
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 30.76 ( 5.3) a | 30.5 (9.43) a | 28.75 (13.74 )ab |
|
| 14.17 ( 0.26) b | 13.22 (1.64) b | 18.75 (2.49) a |
|
| 31 (2.61) a | 42 (4.24) a | 41 (8.67 )b |
|
| |||
|
| 89.37(51.88) | 14.29 (14.86) | 185.91 (142.31) |
|
| 2083.33(645.5) | 1485.33 (510.31) | 2708.33 (1228.99) |
|
| 0.09(0.03) | 0.09 (0.03) | 93.73 (63.15) |
|
| |||
|
| 145 (0) | 149 (0) | 175 (0) |
|
| 2500 (0) | 1250 (0) | 2080 (0) |
|
| 100 (0) | 100 (0) | 400 (0) |
Mean (SD) of minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (in µg/mL) of the medicaments in different time intervals
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 291.67 (101.04) | 50.98 (33.49) | 18.36 (22.67) |
|
| 8333.33 (2886.75) | 1666.67 (721.69) | 543.33 (625.65) |
|
| 16.6 (7.24) | 2 (0.69) | 0.83 (0.65) |
|
| |||
|
| 87.5 (0) | 21.7 (0) | 4.2 (0) |
|
| 5000 (0) | 1666.67 (721.69) | 22.67 (32.33) |
|
| 7.07 (5.03) | 1.2(0) | 1.2 (0) |
|
| |||
|
| 291.67 (101.04) | 175(0) | 1.79 (1.13) |
|
| 5000 (0) | 4200(1385.64) | 41.33 (32.33) |
|
| 166.67 (57.74) | 166.67(57.74) | 1.63 (1.34) |
Figure 1Time killing assay for each medicament in different time intervals (h). Vertical bar shows number of viable bacteria
Figure 2Mean viability (%) of cells after 24 h contact with test materials (concentration in µg/mL). Equal letters show lack of significant difference (P>0.05