| Literature DB >> 26843814 |
Saranya Palaniswamy1, Dylan Williams2, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin3, Sylvain Sebert1.
Abstract
Studies linking vitamin D and long-term metabolic health have generated much debate. Recommendations for the intake of vitamin D by the general public and by the health care professionals have been complicated by a number of inconsistencies in the literature. These caveats relate to the methodological approaches, differences in the populations (and the species) of study, and the definitions used for thresholds of vitamin D status. This review addresses current evidence available for assessing the potential programming of long-term metabolic health of offspring by maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy. It summarizes knowledge on the early origins of metabolic health and analyzes evidence for an association between the vitamin D status in pregnancy and maternal and fetal health status. In addition, we analyze the link between the regulation of inflammation and the vitamin D status in the general population to inform on the general mechanisms through which early vitamin D might affect the programming of long-term health. The evidence suggests an association between the vitamin D status in early life and the programming of long-term health. However, to the best of our knowledge, the current finding is insufficient to draw a final conclusion for evidence-based preventive actions. The data warrant replication in prospective studies and additional research substantiating the causal factors and pathways.Entities:
Keywords: fetal programming; inflammation; maternal outcomes; vitamin D
Year: 2016 PMID: 26843814 PMCID: PMC4737521 DOI: 10.4137/NMI.S29526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab Insights ISSN: 1178-6388
A summary of the current surveys analyzing the impact of maternal vitamin D deficiency on offspring body composition showing large heterogeneity in the design, time of sampling during gestation, and the categorization of the vitamin D status.
| EARLY LIFE FACTORS | STUDY DESIGN | COUNTRY | LATITUDE | N | TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLING IN PREGNANCY | DEFINITION OF DEFICIENCY (nmol/L) | REFERENCES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adiposity/BMI | Birth cohort | Spain | 39° to 43°N | 2358 | 13 weeks GA | <50 nmol/L | |
| Adiposity/BMI | Birth cohort | United Kingdom | 50°N | 875 | 34 weeks GA | Linear association, no cutoffs | |
| Birth weight, small-for-gestational age, postnatal growth | Birth cohort | Netherland | 52°N | 3730 | 13 weeks GA | ≤30 nmol/L | |
| Birth weight, gestational age, mortality and glucose tolerance | Birth cohort | Germany | 52°N | 547 | 38 weeks GA | <1 nmol/L (below level of detection), ≥1 to <25 nmol/L (severe deficiency) and ≥25 nmol/L (moderate deficiency to sufficiency) | |
| Birth weight, small-for-gestational age | Birth cohort | China | 30°N | 3658 | Any stage in pregnancy | <50 nmol/L | |
| BMI at 5 and 9.5 years of age | Observational | India | 12°N | 511 | During delivery | <50 nmol/L |
Figure 1Fourier analysis of maternal vitamin D status (serum 25(OH)D concentration) at 34 weeks of gestation according to the date of blood sample collection (from Crozier et al93).
A summary of recent epidemiological evidence for an association between serum 25(OH)D and the inflammatory component.
| STUDY DESIGN | COUNTRY | SAMPLE SIZE | AGE RANGE | MEAN BMI | CYTOKINE TESTED | OBSERVED ASSOCIATION WITH SERUM 25(OH)D | REFERENCES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional | USA | Female (N = 69) | 25–82 | 24.4 ± 0.8 | TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, CRP | Negative [ | |
| Cross-sectional | USA | Male(N = 9) | 27–37 | 22.0 ± 1.6 | TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10 | Negative [ | |
| Cross-sectional | Northern Ireland | Male (N = 481) | >60 | 28.7(26.5–31.7) | IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, IL-10, IL-6:10 ratio | Negative, IL6: [ | |
| Cross-sectional | Japan | Male (N = 34) | 21–69 | 23.9 ± 2.6 | IL-17, IL-6, IFN-γ | Positive [β = 0.26, P = 0.025] for IL-17 | |
| Cross-sectional | Italy | Male (N = 377) | ≥65 | 27.3 ± 4.0 | IL-6, CRP, slL6r, sgp130, TNF-α, sTNFR1,sTNFR2, IL-1 β, IL-10, IL-18, I L-1 ra | Negative [β ± SE = −0.10 ± 0.03, | |
| Longitudinal | USA | Male (N = 669) | 59–67 | 28.1 ± 5.2 | CRP, IL-6, CD40 ligand, TNF-α, TNF-α receptor, MCP-1, Intracellular adhesion molecule, P-selectin | Not significant | |
| Cross-sectional | USA | Male (N = 14) | 25–42 | 24.8 ± 1.4 | IL-2, TNF-α, IL-1 β, IFN-γ, IL-10 | Not significant |