Literature DB >> 26843585

The Colonic Microbiome and Epithelial Transcriptome Are Altered in Rats Fed a High-Protein Diet Compared with a Normal-Protein Diet.

Chunlong Mu1, Yuxiang Yang1, Zhen Luo1, Leluo Guan2, Weiyun Zhu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high-protein diet (HPD) can produce hazardous compounds and reduce butyrate-producing bacteria in feces, which may be detrimental to gut health. However, information on whether HPD affects intestinal function is limited.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of an HPD on the microbiota, microbial metabolites, and epithelial transcriptome in the colons of rats.
METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats were fed either a normal-protein diet (20% protein, 56% carbohydrate) or an HPD (45% protein, 30% carbohydrate) for 6 wk (n = 10 rats per group, individually fed). After 6 wk, the colonic microbiome, microbial metabolites, and epithelial transcriptome were determined.
RESULTS: Compared with the normal-protein diet, the HPD adversely altered the colonic microbiota by increasing (P < 0.05) Escherichia/Shigella, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and sulfate-reducing bacteria by 54.9-fold, 31.3-fold, 5.36-fold, and 2.59-fold, respectively. However, the HPD reduced Ruminococcus (8.04-fold), Akkermansia (not detected in HPD group), and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (3.5-fold) (P < 0.05), which are generally regarded as beneficial bacteria in the colon. Concomitant increases in cadaverine (4.88-fold), spermine (31.2-fold), and sulfide (4.8-fold) (P < 0.05) and a decrease in butyrate (2.16-fold) (P < 0.05) in the HPD rats indicated an evident shift toward the production of unhealthy microbial metabolites. In the colon epithelium of the HPD rats, transcriptome analysis identified an upregulation of genes (P < 0.05) involved in disease pathogenesis; these genes are involved in chemotaxis, the tumor necrosis factor signal process, and apoptosis. The HPD was also associated with a downregulation of many genes (P < 0.05) involved in immunoprotection, such as genes involved in innate immunity, O-linked glycosylation of mucin, and oxidative phosphorylation, suggesting there may be an increased disease risk in these rats. The abundance of Escherichia/Shigella, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus was positively correlated (Spearman's ρ > 0.7, P < 0.05) with genes and metabolites generally regarded as being involved in disease pathogenesis, suggesting these bacteria may mediate the detrimental effects of HPDs on colonic health.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the HPD altered the colonic microbial community, shifted the metabolic profile, and affected the host response in the colons of rats toward an increased risk of colonic disease.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial metabolites; colonic disease risk; colonic microbiome; epithelial response; epithelial transcriptome; high-protein diet; microbial community

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26843585     DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.223990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  41 in total

1.  Protective effect of the "food-microorganism-SCFAs" axis on colorectal cancer: from basic research to practical application.

Authors:  Han Shuwen; Da Miao; Qi Quan; Wu Wei; Zhang Zhongshan; Zhang Chun; Yang Xi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Metabolite and Microbiome Interplay in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Caroline H Johnson; Mary E Spilker; Laura Goetz; Scott N Peterson; Gary Siuzdak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Hydrogen sulphide in liver glucose/lipid metabolism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Inês Mateus; Carina Prip-Buus
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.722

4.  Effects of the increased protein level in small intestine on the colonic microbiota, inflammation and barrier function in growing pigs.

Authors:  Zhongxin Li; Liren Ding; Weiyun Zhu; Suqin Hang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.465

Review 5.  How Diet and Physical Activity Modulate Gut Microbiota: Evidence, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Daniela Campaniello; Maria Rosaria Corbo; Milena Sinigaglia; Barbara Speranza; Angela Racioppo; Clelia Altieri; Antonio Bevilacqua
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  Bisdemethoxycurcumin attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal damage through improving barrier integrity, suppressing inflammation, and modulating gut microbiota in broilers.

Authors:  Jingfei Zhang; Yuxiang Yang; Hongli Han; Lili Zhang; Tian Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

7.  Paneth cell defects in Crohn's disease patients promote dysbiosis.

Authors:  Ta-Chiang Liu; Bhaskar Gurram; Megan T Baldridge; Richard Head; Vy Lam; Chengwei Luo; Yumei Cao; Pippa Simpson; Michael Hayward; Mary L Holtz; Pavlos Bousounis; Joshua Noe; Diana Lerner; Jose Cabrera; Vincent Biank; Michael Stephens; Curtis Huttenhower; Dermot Pb McGovern; Ramnik J Xavier; Thaddeus S Stappenbeck; Nita H Salzman
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-06-02

Review 8.  Intersection of the Gut Microbiome and Circadian Rhythms in Metabolism.

Authors:  Katya Frazier; Eugene B Chang
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 9.  Gut Microbiota: The Brain Peacekeeper.

Authors:  Chunlong Mu; Yuxiang Yang; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Epithelial response to a high-protein diet in rat colon.

Authors:  Martin Beaumont; Mireille Andriamihaja; Lucie Armand; Marta Grauso; Florence Jaffrézic; Denis Laloë; Marco Moroldo; Anne-Marie Davila; Daniel Tomé; François Blachier; Annaïg Lan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.