| Literature DB >> 26843092 |
Anke Jaudszus1, Jochen G Mainz2, Sylvia Pittag3, Sabine Dornaus2, Christian Dopfer2, Alexander Roth4, Gerhard Jahreis3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circumstantial evidence suggests that conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) beneficially modulates immune function in allergic subjects. C9,t11-CLA, naturally occurring in ruminant fats, is suggested to be the effective isomer. In contrast, for the t10,c12-CLA isomer, which is naturally found only in traces but usually constitutes a relevant part in commercial CLA mixtures, adverse effects have been reported. Aim of this study was to assess putative immunomodulatory effects of highly enriched c9,t11-CLA in allergic subjects. To our best knowledge, our study is the first in that a CLA preparation was used for such purpose which was free of t10,c12-CLA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26843092 PMCID: PMC4739392 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0187-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Demographic data and baseline characteristics of the study participants
| Parameter | Placebo | CLA |
|---|---|---|
| n (female/male) | 13 (8/5) | 15 (5/10) |
| Age (y), median (range) | 13 (7–18) | 13 (6–17) |
| Age groups, n (% all participants) | ||
| 6–12 | 4 (14) | 6 (21) |
| 13–18 | 9 (32) | 9 (32) |
| BMI (kg/m2)a, median (range) | 19.5 (15.3–29.0b) | 19.9 (14.7c-23.5) |
| Major allergen, n (% group participants) | ||
| Phl p1 | 6 (46) | 7 (47) |
| Der p1 | 4 (31) | 5 (33) |
| Fel d1 | 3 (23) | 3 (20) |
| FEV1 % predicted, median (range) | 97 (70–126) | 95 (83–122) |
aAdjusted for clothing
b> Percentile 97
c< percentile 3 of age- and sex-specific range, according to Kromeyer-Hauschild [54]
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study participants recruited and allocated to the study groups, and the design of the study
Fatty acid profiles of the study oils [% FAME]. Combined GC-FID and silver-ion HPLC analysisa
| Fatty acid (common name) | CLA | Placebo oil |
|---|---|---|
| C14:0 (myristic acid) | 0 | 0.1 |
| C16:0 (palmitic acid) | 0.1 | 8.2 |
| C18:0 (stearic acid) | 0.5 | 3.4 |
| C18:1 | 1.8 | 19.9 |
| C18:1 | 0.3 | 0 |
| C18:2 | 3.1 | 64.5 |
| C18:3 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| C20:0 (arachidic acid) | 0.1 | 0.5 |
| C20:1 (eicosenoic acid) | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| C20:5 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 6.8 | 2.3 |
| ∑ CLA | 86.6 | 0 |
|
| 66.1 | |
|
| 19.2 | |
|
| 0.9 | |
|
| 0.1 |
aFor detailed information, please refer to [11]
bCorrected for co-eluting t8,c10
cCorrected for co-eluting t8,t10
Routine haematological parameters
| Parameter | Placebo | CLA |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Start | End | gra | gr × tib | |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.48 ± 0.66 | 4.39 ± 0.78 | 4.32 ± 0.76 | 4.29 ± 0.77 |
|
|
| TAG (mmol/L) | 1.28 ± 0.69 | 1.29 ± 0.96 | 0.90 ± 0.60 | 0.92 ± 0.55 |
|
|
| Creatinine (mmol/L) | 66.3 ± 11.6 | 64.4 ± 9.3 | 62.3 ± 5.5 | 63.9 ± 7.9 |
|
|
| ASAT (μmol/L × s) | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.44 ± 0.09 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.08 |
|
|
| ALAT (μmol/L × s) | 0.56 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.22 | 0.53 ± 0.10 | 0.49 ± 0.09 |
|
|
Data are expressed as means ± SD; astudy group (placebo/CLA), bstudy group (placebo/CLA) × study time point (start/end); ALAT – alanine aminotransferase, ASAT – aspartate aminotransferase, TAG – triacylglycerol
Uptake of macronutrients, ruminant fat, and diet-derived CLA. Per-day values were estimated on the basis of dietary records on the three preceding days prior to blood sampling
| Parameter | Placebo | CLA |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Start | End | gra | gr × tib | |
| Energy intake (kcal/d) | 2087 ± 157 | 2256 ± 193 | 1846 ± 199 | 2031 ± 92 |
|
|
| Carbohydrates (g/d) | 259.8 ± 22.2 | 278.4 ± 29.7 | 238.5 ± 25.4 | 268.3 ± 17.0 |
|
|
| Protein (g/d) | 76.3 ± 7.2 | 81.3 ± 5.7 | 66.8 ± 7.3 | 70.9 ± 4.5 |
|
|
| Fat (g/d) | 79.2 ± 6.7 | 86.6 ± 7.5 | 66.9 ± 9.1 | 71.4 ± 3.3 |
|
|
| Fat from ruminant sources (g/d) | 21.8 ± 3.8 | 17.7 ± 2.3 | 12.2 ± 1.8 | 12.5 ± 2.4 |
|
|
| CLA (mg/d) | 131.1 ± 22.9 | 104.1 ± 12.6 | 77.4 ± 11.5 | 81.3 ± 14.7 |
|
|
| CLA (mg/100 kcal) | 6.1 ± 1.0 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 0.7 |
|
|
Data are expressed as means ± SEM; a study group (placebo/CLA), b study group × study time point
Fig. 2Concentration of 9,11-CLA in RBC. Fatty acid profiles were determined by GC-FID analysis of cellular lipid extracts and are expressed as % of total FAME. Data represent means ± SD. ***Significant increase in all 9,11-CLA isomers compared with placebo and study start (p < 0.001)
Pulmonary function parameters
| Parameter (% predicted) | Placebo | CLA |
| Post-hoc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Start | End | gr × ti × alla | ti × allb | allc | |
| FVC |
|
| |||||
| Phl p1 | 97/94 | 101/96 | 96/95 | 97/97 | |||
| Der p1/Fel d1 | 97/99 | 98/100 | 90/90 | 92/90 | |||
| RV |
|
| |||||
| Phl p1 | 106/109 | 105/120 | 114/104 | 109/97 | |||
| Der p1/Fel d1 | 108/111 | 123/123 | 101/95 | 111/114 | |||
| FEV1 |
|
| |||||
| Phl p1 | 93/91 | 101/95 | 95/97 | 99/96 |
| ||
| Der p1/Fel d1 | 104/112 | 105/114 | 97/95 | 95/95 | |||
| MMEF |
|
| |||||
| Phl p1 | 69/66 | 76/70 | 73/69 | 77/77 | |||
| Der p1/Fel d1 | 92/93 | 91/90 | 87/87 | 81/84 |
Data are expressed as mean/median; astudy group (placebo/CLA) × study time point (start/end) × type of allergy (seasonal/all-year); bstudy time point (start/end) × type of allergy (seasonal/all-year); cseasonal (Phl p1) vs. all-year (Der p1/Fel d1)
Fig. 3Peak expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom score. The PEF values (a) and allergy symptoms (b) were self-recorded every day by the participants throughout the study. Of all patient’s diaries, a total of 21 were filled in correctly. Symptom data of a total of 7 participants (5 of the placebo group) were incomplete and therefore not included. Means are defined by crossmarks
Fig. 4In vitro cytokine production of stimulated PBMC. Box plots depict study start to study end changes in cytokine release. **p < 0.01, p = 0.052
Fig. 5Concentration of plasma ECP
Fig. 6Ratio of n-6/n-3 PUFA (a) and concentration of n-3 PUFA (b) in RBC. Fatty acid profiles were determined by GC-FID analysis of cellular lipid extracts. a The ratio was calculated on the basis of C18-22 PUFA. b Means are defined by crossmarks
Fig. 7Renal excretion of 8-oxodG