Literature DB >> 26842902

The MARINER trial of rivaroxaban after hospital discharge for medical patients at high risk of VTE. Design, rationale, and clinical implications.

Gary E Raskob1, Alex C Spyropoulos, Julie Zrubek, Walter Ageno, Gregory Albers, C Gregory Elliott, Jonathan Halperin, Lloyd Haskell, William R Hiatt, Gregory A Maynard, Gary Peters, Theodore Spiro, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Eun Young Suh, Jeffrey I Weitz.   

Abstract

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of premature death and disability worldwide. Evidence-based guidelines recommend that anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis be given to hospitalised medical patients at risk of VTE, but suggest against routine use of thromboprophylaxis beyond the hospital stay. The MARINER study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis using rivaroxaban, begun at hospital discharge and continued for 45 days, for preventing symptomatic VTE in high-risk medical patients. Eligible patients are identified using the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE VTE) risk score, combined with a laboratory test, D-dimer. The rivaroxaban regimen is 10 mg once daily for patients with CrCl ≥ 50 ml/min, or 7.5 mg once daily for patients with CrCl ≥ 30 ml/min and < 50 ml/min. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of symptomatic VTE (lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis and non-fatal pulmonary embolism) and VTE-related death. The principal safety outcome is major bleeding. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicates all suspected outcome events. The sample size is event-driven with an estimated total of 8,000 patients to acquire 161 primary outcome events. Study design features that distinguish MARINER from previous and ongoing thromboprophylaxis trials in medically ill patients are: (i) use of a validated risk assessment model (IMPROVE VTE) and D-dimer determination for identifying eligible patients at high risk of VTE, (ii) randomisation at the time of hospital discharge, (iii) a 45-day treatment period and (iv) restriction of the primary efficacy outcome to symptomatic VTE events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Venous thromboembolism; anticoagulants; deep-vein thrombosis; medical patients; pulmonary embolism; rivaroxaban; thromboprophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26842902     DOI: 10.1160/TH15-09-0756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  22 in total

Review 1.  Direct oral anticoagulants for extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medically ill patients: are we there yet?

Authors:  Majed S Al Yami; Osamah M Alfayez; Sawsan M Kurdi; Razan Alsheikh
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge in acutely ill medical patients: need for trials in patients who are at high risk of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Banne Nemeth; Willem M Lijfering; Suzanne C Cannegieter
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Has time come for the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients?

Authors:  Franco Piovella; Diana Irina Iosub
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Has time come for the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients? Yes.

Authors:  Walter Ageno
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5.  Extended-duration versus short-duration pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in acutely Ill hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Aaron Y L Liew; Siavash Piran; John W Eikelboom; James D Douketis
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  New Trends in Anticoagulation Therapy.

Authors:  Margaret Smith; Glenn Wakam; Thomas Wakefield; Andrea Obi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Efficacy and safety of pre-operative insertion of inferior vena cava filter in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick Ikesaka; Bhagwanpreet Kaur; Mark Crowther; Anita Rajasekhar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 9.  Current Opinion on the use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism among Medical Inpatients.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Sahar Memar Montazerin; Fahimehalsadat Shojaei; Gerald Chi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients 75 years of age or older.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Renato D Lopes; Mark Goldin; Roger D Yusen; Gregory W Albers; Gregory C Elliott; Jonathan L Halperin; William R Hiatt; Gregory Maynard; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Jeffrey I Weitz; Eunyoung Suh; Wentao Lu; Elliot S Barnathan; Gary E Raskob; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 16.036

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.