OBJECT: Microsurgical clipping is a widely used surgical technique in intracranial aneurysm treatment. It can be difficult in large sized aneurysms, and those with wide necks, thick walls and calcification located in the vicinity of the neck. This study reviewed calcification of the intracranial aneurysm wall and its relation to patient age, gender, location and size of the aneurysm. A possible cut-off value after which the aneurysm calcification rate increases was also investigated to classify patients' risk factors for microclipping. METHODS: A retrospective review of all unruptured intracranial aneurysms that underwent digital subtraction angiography at a single centre was performed. Flat-detector computed tomography images of the aneurysm were reviewed for aneurysm location, size and calcification. The independent samples t test and χ(2) test were used to show the relation between aneurysm wall calcification and patient age, gender, aneurysm localisation and size. RESULTS: None of the reviewed factors were statistically significantly related to aneurysm calcification except aneurysm size (P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed aneurysms greater than 10.5 mm could be predicted to be calcified with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 63%. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of calcification was related to aneurysm size. Larger aneurysms were more likely to be calcified. Aneurysms greater than 10.5 mm should be further investigated with a modality such as flat-detector computed tomography to show the calcification in detail, especially if microclipping is considered.
OBJECT: Microsurgical clipping is a widely used surgical technique in intracranial aneurysm treatment. It can be difficult in large sized aneurysms, and those with wide necks, thick walls and calcification located in the vicinity of the neck. This study reviewed calcification of the intracranial aneurysm wall and its relation to patient age, gender, location and size of the aneurysm. A possible cut-off value after which the aneurysm calcification rate increases was also investigated to classify patients' risk factors for microclipping. METHODS: A retrospective review of all unruptured intracranial aneurysms that underwent digital subtraction angiography at a single centre was performed. Flat-detector computed tomography images of the aneurysm were reviewed for aneurysm location, size and calcification. The independent samples t test and χ(2) test were used to show the relation between aneurysm wall calcification and patient age, gender, aneurysm localisation and size. RESULTS: None of the reviewed factors were statistically significantly related to aneurysm calcification except aneurysm size (P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed aneurysms greater than 10.5 mm could be predicted to be calcified with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 63%. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of calcification was related to aneurysm size. Larger aneurysms were more likely to be calcified. Aneurysms greater than 10.5 mm should be further investigated with a modality such as flat-detector computed tomography to show the calcification in detail, especially if microclipping is considered.
Authors: Sanjay Bhatia; Raymond F Sekula; Matthew R Quigley; Robert Williams; Andrew Ku Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Rajiv Gupta; Michael Grasruck; Christoph Suess; Soenke H Bartling; Bernhard Schmidt; Karl Stierstorfer; Stefan Popescu; Tom Brady; Thomas Flohr Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Joshua B Bederson; E Sander Connolly; H Hunt Batjer; Ralph G Dacey; Jacques E Dion; Michael N Diringer; John E Duldner; Robert E Harbaugh; Aman B Patel; Robert H Rosenwasser Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Neeraj S Naval; Tiffany Chang; Filissa Caserta; Robert G Kowalski; Juan Ricardo Carhuapoma; Rafael J Tamargo Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Redi Rahmani; Jacob F Baranoski; Felipe C Albuquerque; Michael T Lawton; Tomoki Hashimoto Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 5.620