Literature DB >> 26842528

Utilization of supportive care by survivors of colorectal cancer: results from the PROFILES registry.

Jasmijn F M Holla1, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse2,3, Peter C Huijgens3,4, Floortje Mols2,3, Joost Dekker5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In an equitable healthcare system, healthcare utilization should be predominantly explained by patient-perceived need and clinical need factors. This study aims to analyze whether predisposing, enabling, and need factors are associated with the utilization of supportive care (i.e., dietary care, oncological nursing care, physical therapy, psychological care, or participation in a rehabilitation program consisting of an exercise component and a psycho-educational component) among survivors of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands.
METHODS: Cross-sectional data of 3957 survivors of colorectal cancer (1-11 years after diagnosis) were used. Clinical data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry were linked to questionnaire data from the PROFILES registry. Regression analyses were used to examine which predisposing, enabling, and need factors were associated with self-reported utilization of supportive care.
RESULTS: Utilization of supportive care was primarily associated with younger age, patient-perceived need (i.e., lower physical health, anxious mood, depressive mood, and fatigue), and clinical need (i.e., tumor stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, comorbidity, having a stoma and lower BMI) factors.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, utilization of supportive care by survivors of colorectal cancer is primarily associated with younger age, patient-perceived need, and clinical need factors. Apart from the association with younger age, the utilization of supportive care services seems to be quite equitable. Further research is needed to determine whether there is indeed inequity in the provision of supportive care to older survivors, or whether older survivors are less in need of supportive care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Oncology; Rehabilitation care; Supportive care; Utilization of healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26842528     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3109-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  29 in total

1.  National health surveys and the behavioral model of health services use.

Authors:  Ronald Max Andersen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

4.  Predictors of variation in colorectal cancer care and outcomes in New South Wales: a population-based health data linkage study.

Authors:  Mikaela L Jorgensen; Jane M Young; Timothy A Dobbins; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment.

Authors:  Lahiru Russell; Karla Gough; Allison Drosdowsky; Penelope Schofield; Sanchia Aranda; Phyllis N Butow; Jennifer A Westwood; Mei Krishnasamy; Jane M Young; Jo Phipps-Nelson; Dorothy King; Michael Jefford
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  The prevalence of potentially modifiable functional deficits and the subsequent use of occupational and physical therapy by older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Mackenzi Pergolotti; Allison M Deal; Jessica Lavery; Bryce B Reeve; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Health status and health resource use among long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tàrsila Ferro; Luisa Aliste; Montserrat Valverde; M Paz Fernández; Concepción Ballano; Josep M Borràs
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.139

Review 8.  [Colorectal carcinoma in the Netherlands: the situation before and after population surveillance].

Authors:  Marloes A G Elferink; Manon van der Vlugt; Gerrit A Meijer; Valery E P P Lemmens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2014

9.  Screening, assessment, and management of fatigue in adult survivors of cancer: an American Society of Clinical oncology clinical practice guideline adaptation.

Authors:  Julienne E Bower; Kate Bak; Ann Berger; William Breitbart; Carmelita P Escalante; Patricia A Ganz; Hester Hill Schnipper; Christina Lacchetti; Jennifer A Ligibel; Gary H Lyman; Mohammed S Ogaily; William F Pirl; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale.

Authors:  R Philip Snaith
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shared concern with current breast cancer rehabilitation services: a focus group study of survivors' and professionals' experiences and preferences for rehabilitation care delivery.

Authors:  Bolette Skjødt Rafn; Julie Midtgaard; Pat G Camp; Kristin L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Psychological problems among cancer patients in relation to healthcare and societal costs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Florie E Van Beek; Lonneke M A Wijnhoven; Karen Holtmaat; José A E Custers; Judith B Prins; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Femke Jansen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.