Literature DB >> 26842226

Attrition and weight loss outcomes for patients with complex obesity, anxiety and depression attending a weight management programme with targeted psychological treatment.

R C McLean1, D S Morrison2, R Shearer3, S Boyle3, J Logue1.   

Abstract

The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of baseline anxiety and depression, using different definitions for caseness, on attrition and weight outcomes following a multidisciplinary weight management programme. The study design is a prospective observational study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure anxiety and depression with 'caseness' scoring ≥11 and severity ≥14. The participants were all patients who began a weight management programme between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2009 (n = 1838). The setting was the Glasgow and Clyde Weight Management Service (GCWMS), a specialist multidisciplinary service, which aims to achieve a minimum of ≥5 kg weight loss. The results were as follows: patients with HADS score ≥14 were referred to the integrated psychology service for psychological assessment or intervention. Patients with caseness (HADS ≥11) for anxiety (33%) and depression (27%) were significantly younger, heavier, more socio-economically deprived and a higher proportion was female. There was a significant positive correlation between HADS anxiety and depression scores and increasing body mass index (r(2)  = 0.094, P < 0.001 and r(2)  = 0.175, P < 0.001, respectively). Attendance and completion was lower throughout follow-up amongst patients with anxiety or depression. More patients with HADS score ≥11 achieved ≥5 kg or ≥5% weight loss and by 12 months those with anxiety had a significantly higher mean weight loss (P = 0.032). Participants who scored for severe anxiety (HADS ≥14) achieved similar weight loss to those without, whilst participants who scored for severe depression achieved significantly greater weight loss than non-cases at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up (P < 0.01). Despite a less favourable case-mix of risk-factors for poor weight loss, patients who scored caseness for severe anxiety or depression and were offered additional psychological input achieved similar or better weight loss outcomes.
© 2016 World Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; depression; weight loss; weight management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26842226     DOI: 10.1111/cob.12136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  5 in total

Review 1.  The common denominators of sleep, obesity, and psychopathology.

Authors:  Andrew S Tubbs; Waliuddin Khader; Fabian Fernandez; Michael A Grandner
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-12-02

2.  Tier 3 specialist weight management service and pre-bariatric multicomponent weight management programmes for adults with obesity living in the UK: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammed Alkharaiji; Uchenna Anyanwagu; Richard Donnelly; Iskandar Idris
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2018-10-25

3.  The impact of participant mental health on attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: secondary analysis of the WRAP randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca A Jones; Julia Mueller; Stephen J Sharp; Ann Vincent; Robbie Duschinsky; Simon J Griffin; Amy L Ahern
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Lifestyle treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: predictors of weight loss and dropout.

Authors:  Geranne Jiskoot; Alexandra Dietz de Loos; Reinier Timman; Annemerle Beerthuizen; Joop Laven; Jan Busschbach
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  A predictive model for non-completion of an intensive specialist obesity service in a public hospital: a case-control study.

Authors:  Evan Atlantis; Fang Lin; Sulak Anandabaskaran; Paul Fahey; Nic Kormas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.