Literature DB >> 26841931

Intraguild predation and competition impacts on a subordinate predator.

Heidi Björklund1,2, Andrea Santangeli3,4, F Guillaume Blanchet4,5, Otso Huitu6, Hannu Lehtoranta7, Harto Lindén8, Jari Valkama3, Toni Laaksonen9.   

Abstract

Intraguild (IG) predation and interspecific competition may affect the settlement and success of species in their habitats. Using data on forest-dwelling hawks from Finland, we addressed the impact of an IG predator, the northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis (goshawk), on the breeding of an IG prey, the common buzzard Buteo buteo. We hypothesized that the subordinate common buzzard avoids breeding in the proximity of goshawks and that interspecific competitors, mainly Strix owls, may also disturb common buzzards by competing for nests and food. Our results show that common buzzards more frequently occupied territories with a low IG predation threat and with no interspecific competitors. We also observed that common buzzards avoided territories with high levels of grouse, the main food of goshawks, possibly due to a risk of IG predation since abundant grouse can attract goshawks. High levels of small rodents attracted interspecific competitors to common buzzard territories and created a situation where there was not only an abundance of food but also an abundance of competitors for the food. These results suggest interplay between top-down and bottom-up processes which influence the interactions between avian predator species. We conclude that the common buzzard needs to balance the risks of IG predation and interference competition with the availability of its own resources. The presence of other predators associated with high food levels may impede a subordinate predator taking full advantage of the available food. Based on our results, it appears that interspecific interactions with dominant predators have the potential to influence the distribution pattern of subordinate predators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bird-of-prey; Dominance; Food conflict; Interference competition; Predator avoidance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26841931     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3523-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta-analysis of Field Experiments.

Authors:  Jessica Gurevitch; Janet A Morrison; Larry V Hedges
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances.

Authors:  Julia K Baum; Boris Worm
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 3.  Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Euan G Ritchie; Christopher N Johnson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions.

Authors:  G A Polis; R D Holt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  The landscape of fear: the missing link to understand top-down and bottom-up controls of prey abundance?

Authors:  John W Laundré; Lucina Hernández; Perla López Medina; Andrea Campanella; Jorge López-Portillo; Alberto González-Romero; Karina M Grajales-Tam; Anna M Burke; Peg Gronemeyer; Dawn M Browning
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Bottom-up and top-down processes interact to modify intraguild interactions in resource-pulse environments.

Authors:  Aaron C Greenville; Glenda M Wardle; Bobby Tamayo; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Food-limitation in a generalist predator.

Authors:  Christian Rutz; Rob G Bijlsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Food webs and intraguild predation: community interactions of a native mesocarnivore.

Authors:  Craig M Thompson; Eric M Gese
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Competitive interactions among raptors in boreal forests.

Authors:  Harri Hakkarainen; Sakari Mykrä; Sami Kurki; Risto Tornberg; Sven Jungell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Habitat selection as an antipredator behaviour in a multi-predator landscape: all enemies are not equal.

Authors:  Chiara Morosinotto; Robert L Thomson; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  5 in total

1.  How to evaluate the potential occurrence of intraguild predation.

Authors:  Morgana Maria Fonseca; Marta Montserrat; Celeste Guzmán; Inmaculada Torres-Campos; Angelo Pallini; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Predation risk landscape modifies flying and red squirrel nest site occupancy independently of habitat amount.

Authors:  Tytti Turkia; Erkki Korpimäki; Alexandre Villers; Vesa Selonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Organic animal farms increase farmland bird abundance in the Boreal region.

Authors:  Andrea Santangeli; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Tanja Lindholm; Irina Herzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Large-scale spatial synchrony in red squirrel populations driven by a bottom-up effect.

Authors:  Tytti Turkia; Jussi Jousimo; Juha Tiainen; Pekka Helle; Jukka Rintala; Tatu Hokkanen; Jari Valkama; Vesa Selonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Lethal interactions among forest-grouse predators are numerous, motivated by hunger and carcasses, and their impacts determined by the demographic value of the victims.

Authors:  Cristian N Waggershauser; Lise Ruffino; Kenny Kortland; Xavier Lambin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.