| Literature DB >> 26841779 |
Jing Ming1,2, Cunde Xiao3, Feiteng Wang3, Zhongqin Li3, Yamin Li4.
Abstract
The Tienshan Urumqi Glacier No.1 (TUG1) usually shows "grey" surfaces in summers. Besides known regional warming, what should be responsible for largely reducing its surface albedo and making it look "grey"? A field campaign was conducted on the TUG1 on a selected cloud-free day of 2013 after a snow fall at night. Fresh and aged snow samples were collected in the field, and snow densities, grain sizes, and spectral reflectances were measured. Light-absorbing impurities (LAIs) including black carbon (BC) and dust, and number concentrations and sizes of the insoluble particles (IPs) in the samples were measured in the laboratory. High temperatures in summer probably enhanced the snow ageing. During the snow ageing process, the snow density varied from 243 to 458 kg m(-3), associated with the snow grain size varying from 290 to 2500 μm. The concentrations of LAIs in aged snow were significantly higher than those in fresh snow. Dust and BC varied from 16 ppm and 25 ppb in fresh snow to 1507 ppm and 1738 ppb in aged snow, respectively. Large albedo difference between the fresh and aged snow suggests a consequent forcing of 180 W m(-2). Simulations under scenarios show that snow ageing, BC, and dust were responsible for 44, 25, and 7 % of the albedo reduction in the accumulation zone, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Albedo; Black carbon (BC); Dust; Glacier; Tienshan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26841779 PMCID: PMC4871915 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6182-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1a Geographic map of the Urumqi Glacier No.1 (TUG1), and b study map of the Urumqi Glacier No.1, where sampling sites, elevation contours, and AWS are shown, and the dashed is the traditional ELA line
The sampling sites, field measurements, and the BC and dust and insoluble particles in snow samples
| Site code | Long (°E) | Lati (°N) | Alti (m) | Cloud amount (10 = 100 %) | Sample type | Density (kg m−3) | Sample code | Snow grain median size (mm) | Sample volume (ml) | BC (μg) | Dust (mg) | BC (ppb) | Dust (ppm) | Particle (×105 ml−1) | Mean particle size (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 86.8119 | 43.1164 | 3845 | 2 | Fresh snow | 239 | 1-1 | 0.2 | 39.0 | 2.45 | 1.51 | 63 | 39 | n/a | n/a |
| 171 | 1-2 | 28.0 | 1.74 | 1.07 | 62 | 38 | 0.72 | 1.35 | |||||||
| 191 | 1-3 | 26.0 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 33 | 20 | 1.41 | 1.41 | |||||||
| 1-4 | 31.5 | 1.54 | 1.59 | 49 | 50 | 1.88 | 1.52 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 39.0 | 1.14 | 1.40 | 29 | 36 | 1.04 | 1.27 | ||||||||
| S2 | 86.8111 | 43.1142 | 3881 | 1 | Fresh snow | 188 | 2-1 | 0.35 | 38.0 | 0.96 | 0.61 | 25 | 16 | 1.36 | 1.48 |
| 135 | 2-2 | 35.5 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 46 | 46 | 1.73 | 1.30 | |||||||
| 180 | 2-3 | 45.5 | 1.34 | 0.56 | 30 | 12 | 2.87 | 1.21 | |||||||
| 2-4 | 45.0 | 0.75 | 0.54 | 17 | 12 | 1.37 | 1.58 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 50.0 | 0.97 | 0.46 | 19 | 9 | 1.05 | 1.31 | ||||||||
| S3 | 86.8106 | 43.1131 | 3893 | 3 | Fresh snow | 192 | 3-1 | 0.275 | 52.5 | 1.58 | 0.60 | 30 | 12 | 1.00 | 1.33 |
| 213 | 3-2 | 54.0 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 16 | 11 | 0.94 | 1.81 | |||||||
| 216.5 | 3-3 | 51.5 | 1.22 | 0.58 | 24 | 11 | 0.74 | 2.20 | |||||||
| 3-4 | 53.0 | 0.82 | 1.16 | 16 | 22 | 1.08 | 1.66 | ||||||||
| 3-5 | 58.0 | 1.79 | 0.88 | 31 | 15 | 0.92 | 1.58 | ||||||||
| Aged snow | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| S4 | 86.8089 | 43.1106 | 3934 | 3 | Fresh snow | 228.5 | 4-1 | 0.35 | 58.0 | 1.34 | 1.43 | 23 | 25 | 1.75 | 1.29 |
| 215.5 | 4-2 | 52.0 | 1.54 | 0.60 | 30 | 12 | 1.62 | 1.42 | |||||||
| 203 | 4-3 | 47.0 | 0.90 | 1.48 | 19 | 31 | 1.13 | 1.38 | |||||||
| 4-4 | 64.0 | 1.80 | 0.53 | 28 | 8 | 1.71 | 1.43 | ||||||||
| 4-5 | 57.0 | 0.88 | 0.32 | 15 | 6 | 1.53 | 1.40 | ||||||||
| Aged snow | n/a | 4-1* | n/a | 40.0 | n/a | 206.83 | n/a | 5171 | 2.88 | 3.81 | |||||
| n/a | 4-2* | 41.0 | n/a | 59.48 | n/a | 1451 | 98.59 | 1.80 | |||||||
| n/a | 4-3* | 31.5 | n/a | 71.71 | n/a | 2277 | 65.12 | 1.93 | |||||||
| 4-4* | 34.0 | n/a | 206.16 | n/a | 6063 | 259.40 | 1.92 | ||||||||
| 4-5* | 45.5 | n/a | 226.04 | n/a | 4968 | 45.21 | 1.59 | ||||||||
| S5 | 86.8078 | 43.1058 | 4040 | 1 | Fresh snow | 260 | 5-1 | 0.2 | 41.5 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 28 | 8 | 2.86 | 1.36 |
| 301.5 | 5-2 | 65.0 | 1.84 | 1.10 | 28 | 17 | 2.71 | 1.23 | |||||||
| 261.5 | 5-3 | 51.5 | 1.76 | 0.79 | 34 | 15 | 1.78 | 1.43 | |||||||
| 5-4 | 66.5 | 1.45 | 0.71 | 22 | 11 | 2.22 | 1.38 | ||||||||
| 5-5 | 54.0 | 1.15 | 0.69 | 21 | 13 | 1.16 | 1.67 | ||||||||
| Aged snow | 427.5 | 5-1* | 3 | 61.0 | 41.69 | 2.39 | 683 | 39 | 8.20 | 1.79 | |||||
| 455.5 | 5-2* | 69.5 | 26.39 | 1.95 | 380 | 28 | 4.50 | 1.68 | |||||||
| 492 | 5-3* | 55.0 | 71.12 | 4.27 | 1293 | 78 | 3.98 | 1.99 | |||||||
| 5-4* | 43.5 | 178.07 | 7.68 | 4093 | 177 | 5.93 | 2.24 | ||||||||
| 5-5* | 59.0 | 132.10 | 7.03 | 2239 | 119 | 5.55 | 2.31 | ||||||||
| S6 | 86.8064 | 43.1053 | 4050 | 0 | Fresh snow | 378.5 | 6-1 | 0.275 | 51.5 | 1.16 | 0.66 | 23 | 13 | 1.65 | 1.34 |
| 344.5 | 6-2 | 61.0 | 1.60 | 0.91 | 26 | 15 | 1.92 | 1.27 | |||||||
| 319.5 | 6-3 | 61.7 | 1.82 | 1.06 | 29 | 17 | 1.35 | 1.33 | |||||||
| 6-4 | 56.7 | 1.53 | 1.00 | 27 | 18 | 1.98 | 1.34 | ||||||||
| 6-5 | 53.5 | 1.50 | 1.12 | 28 | 21 | 1.48 | 1.39 | ||||||||
| Aged snow | 446 | 6-1* | 2 | 90.5 | n/a | 40.76 | n/a | 450 | 2.86 | 2.69 | |||||
| 440.5 | 6-2* | 85.5 | n/a | 21.83 | n/a | 255 | 4.69 | 2.68 | |||||||
| 495 | 6-3* | 84.0 | n/a | 16.68 | n/a | 199 | 2.85 | 2.95 | |||||||
| 6-4* | 90.0 | n/a | 42.71 | n/a | 475 | 4.06 | 2.73 | ||||||||
| 6-5* | 90.0 | n/a | 76.41 | n/a | 849 | 2.48 | 3.72 |
Fig. 2Pictures of the TUG1 taken on a 9th and b 10th August of 2013
Fig. 3The mean concentrations of a BC and b dust in fresh (blue line and dots) and aged (red line and dots) snow at the sampling sites. Error bars were calculated as the standard deviations of five samples at each site
Fig. 4The a concentrations and b sizes of the insoluble particles in fresh (blue line and dots) and aged (red line and dots) snow at the sampling sites. Error bars were calculated as the standard deviations of five samples at each site
Fig. 5a The mean spectral reflectances of the fresh (blue) and aged (red) snow surfaces with one ± σ, and b the broadband albedos of the fresh (blue) and aged (red) snow surfaces
Fig. 6The downward solar irradiance measured by the AWS, where the black dots are the half-hour measurements, the blue line is the running average, and the red dashed is the mean
The parameters used in the albedo simulation for fresh and aged snow and other designed scenarios at site 5
| Snow types and scenarios | Surface fresh snow at S5 | Beneath aged snow at S5* | Snow ageing excluding BC and dust aggregation | Fresh snow + dust aggregation excluding snow ageing and BC aggregation | Fresh snow + BC aggregation excluding snow ageing and dust aggregation | Snow ageing + dust aggregation excluding BC aggregation | Snow ageing + BC aggregation excluding dust aggregation | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solar zenith angle (°) | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
| Snowpack depth (m) | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Snow density (kg m−3) | 274 | 458 | 458 | 274 | 274 | 458 | 458 | |
| Cloud amount (10 = 100 %) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Clear-sky for modelling |
| Snow grain radius (μm) | 100 | 1500 | 1500 | 100 | 100 | 1500 | 1500 | |
| Albedo of underlying ground (0.3–0.7 μm) | 0.62 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
| Albedo of underlying ground (0.7–5.0 μm) | 0.53 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Sulfate-coated BC (ppb) | 27 | 1738 | 27 | 27 | 1738 | 27 | 1738 | |
| Dust (ppm) | 13 | 88 | 13 | 88 | 13 | 88 | 13 | |
| Mean particle size (μm) | 1.0–2.5 | 1.0–2.5 | 1.0–2.5 | 1.0–2.5 | 1.0–2.5 | 1.0–2.5 | 1.0–2.5 | Mean sizes are 1.41 and 2.00 μm for fresh and aged snow, respectively |
| MAC scaling factor (experimental) | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.3 | Hydrophilic BC |
| Simulated albedo | 0.782 | 0.325 | 0.580 | 0.752 | 0.667 | 0.511 | 0.316 | |
| Measured albedo | 0.771 | 0.587 | ||||||
| Albedo reduction | 0.457 | 0.202 | 0.030 | 0.115 | 0.271 | 0.466 | ||
| Attributable proportion (%) | 44 | 7 | 25 | 59 |