Deiviane Aparecida Calegar1, Beatriz Coronato Nunes2, Kerla Joeline Lima Monteiro2, Jéssica Pereira Dos Santos3, Helena Keiko Toma4, Tais Ferreira Gomes5, Marli Maria Lima5, Márcio Neves Bóia1, Filipe Anibal Carvalho-Costa2. 1. Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. 2. Laboratório de Epidemiologia e Sistemática Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. 3. Escritório Técnico Regional Fiocruz Piauí, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasil. 4. Laboratório de Diagnóstico Molecular e Hematologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. 5. Laboratório de Ecoepidemiologia da Doença de Chagas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the frequency, associated factors, and molecular characterisation of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, andEntamoeba hartmanni infections. We performed a survey (n = 213 subjects) to obtain parasitological, sanitation, and sociodemographic data. Faecal samples were processed through flotation and centrifugation methods.E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, and E. hartmanni were identified by nested-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The overall prevalence of infection was 22/213 (10.3%). The infection rate among subjects who drink rainwater collected from roofs in tanks was higher than the rate in subjects who drink desalinated water pumped from wells; similarly, the infection rate among subjects who practice open defecation was significantly higher than that of subjects with latrines. Out of the 22 samples positive for morphologically indistinguishableEntamoeba species, the differentiation by PCR was successful for 21. The species distribution was as follows: 57.1% to E. dispar, 23.8% to E. histolytica, 14.3% toE. histolytica and E. dispar, and 4.8% E. dispar and E. hartmanni. These data suggest a high prevalence of asymptomatic infection by the group of morphologically indistinguishable Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskiicomplex and E. hartmanni species. In this context of water scarcity, the sanitary and socioenvironmental characteristics of the region appear to favour transmission.
This study aimed to estimate the frequency, associated factors, and molecular characterisation of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, andEntamoeba hartmanniinfections. We performed a survey (n = 213 subjects) to obtain parasitological, sanitation, and sociodemographic data. Faecal samples were processed through flotation and centrifugation methods.E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, and E. hartmanni were identified by nested-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The overall prevalence of infection was 22/213 (10.3%). The infection rate among subjects who drink rainwater collected from roofs in tanks was higher than the rate in subjects who drink desalinated water pumped from wells; similarly, the infection rate among subjects who practice open defecation was significantly higher than that of subjects with latrines. Out of the 22 samples positive for morphologically indistinguishableEntamoeba species, the differentiation by PCR was successful for 21. The species distribution was as follows: 57.1% to E. dispar, 23.8% to E. histolytica, 14.3% toE. histolytica and E. dispar, and 4.8% E. dispar and E. hartmanni. These data suggest a high prevalence of asymptomatic infection by the group of morphologically indistinguishable Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskiicomplex and E. hartmanni species. In this context of water scarcity, the sanitary and socioenvironmental characteristics of the region appear to favour transmission.
Intestinal protozoan infections are closely related to a lack of proper sanitation and
environmental contamination with faecal matter. Thus, their prevalence is higher in
specific environmental scenarios that occur most often in developing countries (Ojha et al. 2014, Turkeltaub et al. 2015). Amoebiasis is a potentially severe and life threatening
infection caused by enteric protozoa (Ralston & Petri
Jr 2011, Skappak et al. 2014), most
commonly Entamoeba histolytica, which is distributed worldwide (WHO 1997, Jackson
1998). The motile (trophozoite) form ofE. histolytica inhabits
the human colon where it multiplies and differentiates into cysts that are released into
the environment. In turn, these cysts are responsible for transmitting the infection to
another host via the faecal-oral route. The parasite invades the
intestinal mucosa and causes many forms of invasive disease, including dysentery (Lin & Kao 2013). The parasite also exhibits
bloodborne spreading and causes extraintestinal lesions, mainly liver abscesses (Wuerz et al. 2012). The latter form occurs only rarely.
Invasive disease occurs when virulent trophozoites disrupt the mucoepithelial barrier by
crossing the mucus layer, thereby damaging intestinal cells. This damage leads to
inflammation and, consequently, dysentery (Thibeaux et al.
2013). Nevertheless, the majority of infections seem to be asymptomatic (Chacín-Bonilla 2013).The existence of nonpathogenic indistinguishable E.
histolytica/Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba
moshkovskiicomplex and Entamoeba hartmanni organisms capable
of inhabiting the human intestine as commensals has been recognised for many decades. For
instance, in 1926, Brumpt proposed the existence of E. dispar, a species
indistinguishable by light microscopy from E. histolytica. However,
E. dispar exhibits distinct physiological, biochemical, and
ultrastructural characteristics, the latter of which have been described more recently
(Goldman 1969, Jackson 1998, Pimenta et al. 2002).
Another four-nucleated morphologically identical organism, E. moshkovskii,
has been observed in sewage as a free-living amoeba, but is also capable of colonising the
human intestine (Tshalaia 1941, Ngui et al. 2012). In addition, differential diagnosis
should also consider the nonpathogenic species E. hartmanni, which can be
distinguished from E. histolyticaby its small cyst size (5-10 µm in
diameter). In contrast, the diameter of E. histolytica cysts ranges from
12-14 µm (Brumpt 1949).More recently, dysentery and extraintestinal disease have been proposed to be potentially
associated with E. dispar and E. moshkovskii (Parija & Khairnar 2005, Costa et al. 2010). These findings complicated our understanding of the
pathogenic behaviour and public health importance of indistinguishable E.
histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and E. hartmanni
parasites (Oliveira et al. 2015).Vast rural areas in northeastern Brazil are characterised by deficits in sanitation
infrastructure. Moreover, improper disposal of waste occurs frequently. These semiarid
regions are also subjected to water stress due to prolonged droughts. Therefore,
alternative water management approaches have been applied in this region (Rasella 2013). In this context, specific
epidemiological scenarios associated with water scarcity could favour transmission of
enteric pathogens. For example, water must be stored for many months during the dry
season.This study aimed to use molecular techniques to estimate the frequencies of infection with
E. histolytica, E. dispar, E.
moshkovskii, and E. hartmanni in a population subjected to
water scarcity in the Northeast Region of Brazil. This study also aimed to
identify factors associated with these infections.
SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area and population - This study was performed in Russas, a
municipality located 165 km from Fortaleza, the capital of the state of Ceará (Fig. 1). This region belongs to the semiarid region
of northeastern Brazil, in the Caatinga biome. Russas has 74,243
inhabitants and a total area of 1,588 km2. The study included four rural
communities in the municipality: Riacho do Barro (132 inhabitants), Timbaúba do Pitingão
(109 inhabitants), Barracão (315 inhabitants), and Patos de Tito (54 inhabitants).
Russas has a hot, dry climate and is subjected to prolonged droughts. The rainy season
typically extends from December-June (annual rainfall in 2013 = 418 mm, mean annual
rainfall = 792.6 mm). Nevertheless, seasonal rains have been reduced in the last few
years and the region has been subjected to severe drought during the field work
periods.
Fig. 1
: map of the study area (Russas, state of Ceará, Brazil, 2013).
Study design and sampling strategy - We performed a cross-sectional
survey from August-September 2013. The survey included 213 subjects (70 families): 53
subjects (18 families) from Timbaúba do Pitingão, 28 subjects (9 families) from Riacho
do Barro, 119 subjects (38 families) from Barracão and 13 subjects (5 families) from
Patos do Tito. Therefore, our study included 35% of the 610 residents in the four
communities. We designed our sampling strategy specifically to include all households
with children. During domicile visits, researchers distributed bottles without
preservatives for faeces collection and obtained sanitation and sociodemographic data.
In addition, the field team investigated whether the residents presented symptoms
consistent with amoebiasis, such as diarrhoea, presence of mucus, pus, and/or blood in
the stool, and abdominal pain, among others. The baseline characteristics of the study
subjects are presented in Table I. Stool samples
were collected the next day at each household and were transported to the field
laboratory under refrigeration (4ºC). The rates of E. histolytica,
E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, and E.
hartmannidetection in distinct sociodemographic settings were compared using
Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.
TABLE I
Sociodemographic characteristics of the studied population, Russas, state
of Ceará, Brazil, 2013
Characteristics
n (%)
Gender
Male
106 (49.8)
Female
107 (50.2)
Age group (years)
0-4
18 (8.4)
5-9
27 (12.7)
10-14
37 (17.4)
15-19
14 (6.6)
> 19
117 (54.9)
Community
Barracão
119 (55.9)
Patos do Tito
13 (6.1)
Riacho do Barro
28 (13.1)
Timbaúba do Pitingão
53 (24.9)
Income strata
Extreme poverty (< US$a 17)
20 (9.4)
Poverty (US$ 17-34)
27 (12.7)
Not poor (> US$ 34)
166 (77.9)
Source of drinking water
Desalinated brackish water from wells
138 (64.8)
Rain water stored in cisterns
56 (26.3)
Other
19 (8.9)
Sanitation facilities
Latrine
166 (77.9)
Open defecation
47 (22.1)
a: US$ 1.00 = R$ 4,00 (22 September 2015).
a: US$ 1.00 = R$ 4,00 (22 September 2015).Laboratory procedures - Initially, faecal samples were processed
through the zinc sulphate flotation (Faust technique) and the formalin-ethyl-acetate
centrifugation (modified Ritchie technique) methods (Faust et al. 1938, Young et al. 1979).
For the Faust technique, 7 mL of gauze-filtered faecal suspension was spun by
centrifugation and the resultant pellet was re-suspended in zinc sulphate solution
(1,180 g/mL). The suspension was shaken and spun by centrifugation again, after which
the resultant supernatant was examined by light microscopy. For the Ritchie method,
gauze-filtered faecal suspensions were spun by centrifugation and the resultant pellets
were re-suspended in 5 mL of water and 3 mL of ethyl-acetate was added to each
suspension. The sedimented matter was examined by light microscopy. It was not possible
to perform permanent smear staining for light microscopy or to measure amoebae cysts in
the field laboratory; thus, E. hartmanni could not be distinguished
from E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E.
moshkovskii. Faecal samples were cryopreserved and transported to the city
of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for molecular tests. All indistinguishable E.
histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and E.
hartmanni positive faecal samples were subjected to DNA extraction using the
ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep™ kit. Nested-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was
performed according to the protocol described by Paglia
and Visca (2004). Initially, 1,076 bp fragment of the small subunit rRNA gene
sequence common to the Entamoeba genus was amplified using primers E1
(5-TGCTGTGATTAAAACGCT-3) and E2 (5-TTAACTATTTCAATCTCGG-3). Nested-PCR was performed with
primers Eh-L (5-ACATTTTGAAGACTTTATGTAAGTA-3) and Eh-R (5-CAGATCTAGAAACAATGCTTCTCT-3),
which are specific for E. histolytica and amplify a 427 bp fragment,
Ed-L (5-GTTAGTTATCTAATTTCGATTAGAA-3) and Ed-R (5-ACACCACTTACTATCCCTACC-3), which are
specific for E. dispar and amplify a 195 bp product, and Mos 1
(5-GAAACCAAGAGTTTCACAAC-3) and Mos 2 (5-CAATATAAGGCTTGGATGAT-3), which are specific for
E. moshkovskii and yield a 553 bp product (Paglia & Visca 2004, Lau et al.
2013). Molecular characterisation of E. hartmanni was
performed essentially as described by Gomes et al.
(2014), but with minor modifications. Briefly, primers EhartR1 mod
(5-ATTGTCTTCACTATTCCATGCC-3) and EhartF mod (5-CCAGCTTTCCAAACATGATG-3) were used to
amplify a 186 bp product. PCR products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gels, stained with
ethidium bromide, and visualisedvia ultraviolet illumination.Ethics - This study was approved by the Ethical Committee in Research
with Humans, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (CAAE:
12125713.5.0000.5248).
RESULTS
The overall prevalence of infection with indistinguishable E. histolytica/E.
dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and E. hartmanniorganisms was
22/213 (10.3%). Of these 22 positive faecal samples, one was identified only through the
flotation (Faust) method, 13 were identified only with the centrifugation (Ritchie 1948) method, and eight were identified with
both techniques. The detection rates of nonpathogenic amoebas were as follows:
Endolimax nana, 4.2% (n = 9),Entamoeba coli, 11.3%
(n = 24), and Iodamoeba butschlli, 7% (n = 15). Giardia
intestinalis was detected in 30 subjects (14.1%). The age distribution of
indistinguishableE. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and
E. hartmanniinfections is presented in Fig. 2. Regarding infection positivity according to sex,
indistinguishable E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and
E. hartmanniinfections were found in 12/106 males and 10/107
females (p = 0.704).
Fig. 2
: results of parasitological analysis for Entamoeba
histolytica/Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba
moshkovskiicomplex and Entamoeba
hartmanniconsidering the age groups (Russas, state of Ceará, Brazil,
2013).
As presented in Table II, the detection rate of
indistinguishable E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskiicomplex and
E. hartmanni among subjects who drink rainwater collected from roofs
in tanks was higher than the rate in people who drink desalinated water pumped from
wells. In addition, the detection rate among subjects who practice open defecation was
significantly higher than that of inhabitants who have latrines. The positivity rates of
subjects in different income strata were similar.
TABLE II
Rate of detection of Entamoeba
histolytica/Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba
moshkovskii complex andEntamoeba hartmanni by
source of drinking water, place of defecation, and income, Russas, state of
Ceará, Brazil, 2013
a: Fisher exact test; b: US$ 1.00 = R$
4,00 (22 September 2015).Species-level identification could be performed for 21 of the 22 samples positive for
indistinguishable E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and
E. hartmanni. The species distribution was as follows: 12 (57.1%)
E. dispar, 5 (23.8%) E. histolytica, 3 (14.3%)
co-infections with E. histolytica and E. dispar, and
one (4.8%) co-infection with E. dispar andE. hartmanni
(Fig. 3). No sample was positive for E.
moshkovskii. The age distributions of subjects infected with different
species are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 3
: detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica,
Entamoeba moshkovskii,Entamoeba dispar and
Entamoeba hartmanni by nested-polymerase chain reaction.
PCR products were visualised in 1.5% agarose gel with EtBr staining. Line 1:
100 bp DNA ladder; 2, 3: one faecal sample with mixed infection by E.
dispar and E. histolytica, respectively; 4, 6, 7:
faecal samples positive for E. dispar; 5, 14: empty wells; 8,
9: faecal samples positive for E. histolytica; 10: negative
control for E. dispar; 11: negative control for E.
histolytica; 12: positive control for E. dispar;
13: positive control for E. histolytica; 15: faecal sample
positive for E. hartmanni; 16: negative control.
Fig. 4
: frequency of identification of Entamoeba histolytica,
Entamoeba moshkovskii,Entamoeba dispar and
Entamoeba hartmanni by nested-polymerase chain reaction by
age group in 21 positive subjects (Russas, state of Ceará, Brazil,
2013).
DISCUSSION
A key issue for understanding the morbidity associated with amoebiasis is to define the
proportion of infections associated with the pathogenic species E.
histolytica. Interestingly, studies in different regions have shown that
many subjects infected with indistinguishable E. histolytica/E. dispar/E.
moshkovskii complex and E. hartmanniparasites actually
harbour low-pathogenicity species such as E. dispar, E.
moshkovskii, or even E. hartmanni (Gomes et al. 2014,Nair & Variyam
2014, Efunshile et al. 2015, , Nath et al. 2015). The proportions of these subjects
are variable, but can be quite high.E. dispar and E. moshkovskii are indistinguishable
from E. histolytica by light microscopy. Thus, routine parasitological
techniques are not suitable for discriminating these organisms. This limitation means
that a significant number of patients being treated with antiparasitic drugs such as
metronidazole may not actually be infected withE. histolytica.In the present study, approximately two-thirds of all infections were not caused
byE. histolytica. We note that all subjects were asymptomatic at the
time of the stool test. Even so, we infer that nonpathogenic species are detected more
frequently than E. histolytica in the studied area. This observation is
particularly relevant because increasing importance has been given to traditionally
nonpathogenic species such as E. dispar andE.
moshkovskii, since invasive amoebiasis has been demonstrated to be
associated with these species (Parija & Khairnar
2005). It is likely that the determinants of invasive amoebiasis are complex
and also involve host factors (Bosch & Siderovski
2013, Thibeaux et al. 2013).The nonpathogenic species E. hartmanni can be distinguished
fromE. histolytica, E. dispar, and E.
moshkovskii by light microscopy. However, this distinction requires detailed
observation of nuclear structures, which requires permanent smear staining, an ocular
micrometer, and a highly skilled parasitologist. These criteria are hard to meet for
many laboratories. We propose that the possibility of E. hartmanniinfection should also be considered in people who excrete indistinguishable E.
histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and E.
hartmanni cysts. In the present study, E. hartmanni was
detected in one of the indistinguishable E. histolytica/E. dispar/E.
moshkovskii complex and E. hartmanni positive samples.The study population is located in a sociodemographic and environmental setting
characterised by deficits in sanitation infrastructure and water stress. The study area
is located in a low-rainfall region in the Caatinga biome that is
subjected to prolonged droughts and prone to desertification. Nonpotable water is
obtained from a reservoir in the locality and used for livestock watering and other
suitable applications. In the last decade, a strategy has been implemented in which
rainwater is collected during the rainy season from roofs viagutters.
This collected rainwater is stored in household tanks for later use during droughts.
This strategy has significantly improved access to drinking water in the study area.
Artesian wells constructed in the region are another source of drinking water. However,
this water is brackish and must be desalinated before consumption. We found that the
rate of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E.
hartmanni positivity was almost three times higher in subjects who drink
collected rainwater than in subjects who drink desalinated brackish water drawn from the
artesian wells. We hypothesise that the long period (between the dry season and the
rainy season) of rainwater storage in tanks favours contamination with amoeba cysts,
thereby enabling transmission. Interestingly, consumption of rainwater captured from
roofs has been demonstrated to reduce the prevalence of G. intestinalisinfection in a semiarid region in northeastern Brazil (Fonseca et al. 2014). Regarding the place of defecation, subjects who
practice open defecation exhibited a significantly higher positive rate compared with
subjects who defecate in latrines. Moreover, an even higher positive rate was observed
in people who deposit faeces directly into the soil compared with subjects with
rudimentary tanks.In some regions of the world, including Latin America, inadequate sanitary conditions
facilitate the transmission of amoebiasis, thereby generating high prevalence rates
(Braga et al. 1998, Ramos et al. 2005). In these scenarios, invasive amebic dysentery
and liver abscesses are expected to occur. However, these diseases were not observed in
the present study. Severe cases of amoebiasis are identified infrequently in Brazil,
which may be explained by the relative improvement of living conditions over the past
few decades.Cumulatively, our data suggest a high prevalence of asymptomatic infection with
indistinguishable E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex and
E. hartmanni parasites. These asymptomatic infections appear to be
caused by predominantly nonpathogenic species or parasites with low pathogenic
potential. In the context of scarce water resources, the sanitary and socioenvironmental
characteristics of the region appear to be associated with transmission.
Authors: Terry Wuerz; Jennifer B Kane; Andrea K Boggild; Sigmund Krajden; Jay S Keystone; Milan Fuksa; Kevin C Kain; Ralph Warren; John Kempston; Joe Anderson Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Jacqueline Evangelista Fonseca; Mariângela Carneiro; João Luiz Pena; Enrico A Colosimo; Nívea Bispo da Silva; André Gabriel F C da Costa; Luciano E Moreira; Sandy Cairncross; Léo Heller Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2014-06-19
Authors: Luis Quihui-Cota; Gloria Guadalupe Morales-Figueroa; Aarón Javalera-Duarte; José Antonio Ponce-Martínez; Edith Valbuena-Gregorio; Marco Antonio López-Mata Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Caroline Ferraz Ignacio; Milena Enderson Chagas da Silva; Natasha Berendonk Handam; Maria de Fatima Leal Alencar; Adriana Sotero-Martins; Martha Macedo de Lima Barata; Antonio Henrique Almeida de Moraes Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 1.846
Authors: Neci M Soares; Helen C Azevedo; Flávia T F Pacheco; Joelma N de Souza; Rodrigo P Del-Rei; Márcia C A Teixeira; Fred L N Santos Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Alexandre Pessoa Dias; Deiviane Calegar; Filipe Anibal Carvalho-Costa; Maria de Fátima Leal Alencar; Caroline Ferraz Ignacio; Milena Enderson Chagas da Silva; Antonio Henrique Almeida de Moraes Neto Journal: J Trop Med Date: 2018-07-18
Authors: Deiviane A Calegar; Kerla J L Monteiro; Andressa B Gonçalves; Márcio N Boia; Lauren H Jaeger; Beatriz C Nunes; Filipe A Carvalho-Costa Journal: J Trop Med Date: 2020-07-14