Literature DB >> 26840437

Comparison of Two Fluid Replacement Protocols During a 20-km Trail Running Race in the Heat.

Rebecca M Lopez1, Douglas J Casa, Katherine A Jensen, Rebecca L Stearns, Julie K DeMartini, Kelly D Pagnotta, Melissa W Roti, Lawrence E Armstrong, Carl M Maresh.   

Abstract

Lopez, RM, Casa, DJ, Jensen, K, Stearns, RL, DeMartini, JK, Pagnotta, KD, Roti, MW, Armstrong, LE, and Maresh, CM. Comparison of two fluid replacement protocols during a 20-km trail running race in the heat. J Strength Cond Res 30(9): 2609-2616, 2016-Proper hydration is imperative for athletes striving for peak performance and safety, however, the effectiveness of various fluid replacement strategies in the field setting is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate how two hydration protocols affect physiological responses and performance during a 20-km trail running race. A randomized, counter-balanced, crossover design was used in a field setting (mean ± SD: WBGT 28.3 ± 1.9° C). Well-trained male (n = 8) and female (n = 5) runners (39 ± 14 years; 175 ± 9 cm; 67.5 ± 11.1 kg; 13.4 ± 4.6% BF) completed two 20-km trail races (5 × 4-km loop) with different water hydration protocols: (a) ad libitum (AL) consumption and (b) individualized rehydration (IR). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Paired t-tests compared pre-race-post-race measures. Main outcome variables were race time, heart rate (HR), gastrointestinal temperature (TGI), fluid consumed, percent body mass loss (BML), and urine osmolality (Uosm). Race times between groups were similar. There was a significant condition × time interaction (p = 0.048) for HR, but TGI was similar between conditions. Subjects replaced 30 ± 14% of their water losses in AL and 64 ± 16% of their losses in IR (p < 0.001). Ad libitum trial experienced greater BML (-2.6 ± 0.5%) compared with IR (-1.3 ± 0.5%; p < 0.001). Pre-race to post-race Uosm differences existed between AL (-273 ± 146 mOsm) and IR (-145 ± 215 mOsm, p = 0.032). In IR, runners drank twice as much fluid than AL during the 20-km race, leading to > 2% BML in AL. Ad libitum drinking resulted in 1.3% greater BML over the 20-km race, which resulted in no thermoregulatory or performance differences from IR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840437     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Influence of Drinking Fluid on Endurance Cycling Performance: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Justin J Holland; Tina L Skinner; Christopher G Irwin; Michael D Leveritt; Eric D B Goulet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Ad libitum drinking adequately supports hydration during 2 h of running in different ambient temperatures.

Authors:  Martin D Hoffman; Rhiannon M J Snipe; Ricardo J S Costa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comment on "Drinking Strategies: Planned Drinking Versus Drinking to Thirst''.

Authors:  Eric D B Goulet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Impact of Ad Libitum Versus Programmed Drinking on Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eric D B Goulet; Martin D Hoffman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Individual fluid plans versus ad libitum on hydration status in minor professional ice hockey players.

Authors:  Dawn M Emerson; Toni M Torres-McGehee; Charles C Emerson; Teri L LaSalle
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Personalized Hydration Strategy Attenuates the Rise in Heart Rate and in Skin Temperature Without Altering Cycling Capacity in the Heat.

Authors:  Denise de Melo-Marins; Ana Angélica Souza-Silva; Gabriel Lucas Leite da Silva-Santos; Francisco de Assis Freire-Júnior; Jason Kai Wei Lee; Orlando Laitano
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 7.  Does Hypohydration Really Impair Endurance Performance? Methodological Considerations for Interpreting Hydration Research.

Authors:  Lewis J James; Mark P Funnell; Ruth M James; Stephen A Mears
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 11.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.