Literature DB >> 26840188

Evaluating the safety and the effects on colonic compliance of neostigmine during motility testing in patients with chronic constipation.

M A Mouchli1, M Camilleri1, T Lee2, G Parthasarathy1, P Vijayvargiya1, M Halland1, A Acosta1, A E Bharucha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neostigmine, an acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor, stimulates colonic motor activity and may induce vagally mediated cardiovascular effects. Our aim was to evaluate effects of i.v. neostigmine on colonic compliance and its safety in patients with chronic constipation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of a selected group of 144 outpatients with chronic constipation who were refractory to treatment. These patients had undergone intracolonic motility and compliance measurements with an infinitely compliant balloon linked to a barostat. Data abstracted included barostat balloon mean volumes with increases in pressure (4 mmHg steps from 0 to 44 mmHg) before and after i.v. neostigmine. Vital signs and oxygen saturation before and after neostigmine were recorded. KEY
RESULTS: Of the 144 patients, 133 were female, mean age was 41.0 ± 15.4 years (SD), and duration of constipation was 12.9 ± 13.8 years. Among patients who had undergone colonic transit measurement by scintigraphy, the overall colonic transit at 24 h (geometric center, GC24 [n = 115]) was 1.5 ± 0.7 (normal >1.3), and at 48 h (GC48 [n = 75]) it was 2.3 ± 0.9 (normal >1.9). Neostigmine decreased colonic compliance at lower distension pressures (e.g., 12 and 20 mmHg [both p < 0.001]), but not at 40 mmHg. There were expected minor changes in vital signs in response to neostigmine in 144 patients; however, one patient developed unresponsiveness, significant bradycardia, hypotension, and muscular rigidity that responded to 400 mcg i.v. atropine. CONCLUSIONS &amp; INFERENCES: Neostigmine significantly decreases colonic compliance in patients with refractory chronic constipation. Symptomatic bradycardia in response to neostigmine should be promptly reversed with atropine.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic constipation; colonic compliance; motility testing; neostigmine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840188      PMCID: PMC4877263          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  32 in total

1.  Relationships between spatial patterns of colonic pressure and individual movements of content.

Authors:  I J Cook; Y Furukawa; V Panagopoulos; P J Collins; J Dent
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: long-term functional and quality of life results.

Authors:  Imran Hassan; John H Pemberton; Tonia M Young-Fadok; Y Nancy You; Ernesto R Drelichman; Doris Rath-Harvey; Cathy D Schleck; Dirk R Larson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Spencer D Dorn; Anthony Lembo; Amanda Pressman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Prevalence of colonic motor or evacuation disorders in patients presenting with chronic nausea and vomiting evaluated by a single gastroenterologist in a tertiary referral practice.

Authors:  G J Kolar; M Camilleri; D Burton; A Nadeau; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Renal function and the pharmacokinetics of neostigmine in anesthetized man.

Authors:  R Cronnelly; D R Stanski; R D Miller; L B Sheiner; Y J Sohn
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Regional colon transit in patients with dys-synergic defaecation or slow transit in patients with constipation.

Authors:  Sara Nullens; Tyler Nelsen; Michael Camilleri; Duane Burton; Deborah Eckert; Johanna Iturrino; Maria Vazquez-Roque; Alan R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Lower functional gastrointestinal disorders: evidence of abnormal colonic transit in a 287 patient cohort.

Authors:  N Manabe; B S Wong; M Camilleri; D Burton; S McKinzie; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Effect of neostigmine on gastroduodenal motility in patients with suspected gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Authors:  G Parthasarathy; K Ravi; M Camilleri; C Andrews; L A Szarka; P A Low; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Rectal wall contractility in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic severe constipation.

Authors:  R L Grotz; J H Pemberton; K E Levin; A M Bell; R B Hanson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The motility of the pelvic colon. II. Paradoxical motility in diarrhoea and constipation.

Authors:  A M CONNELL
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Authors:  Eamonn M M Quigley
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-09-08

2.  Measurement of Gastrointestinal and Colonic Motor Functions in Humans and Animals.

Authors:  Michael Camilleri; David R Linden
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07

3.  Regional Colonic Transit Pattern Does Not Conclusively Identify Evacuation Disorders in Constipated Patients with Delayed Colonic Transit.

Authors:  Seon-Young Park; Duane Burton; Irene Busciglio; Deborah Eckert; Michael Camilleri
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.