| Literature DB >> 26839873 |
Yun Kyung Choi1, Ji-Myung Kim2, Ji-Eun Lee3, Mi Sook Cho4, Bong Soo Kang5, Hyeon Choi6, Yuri Kim4.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to evaluate zinc, copper, and iron concentrations in the transitory milk of Korean lactating mothers and to investigate the relationship between these concentrations and maternal diet. Human milk samples were collected between 5 and 15 days postpartum from 96 healthy, lactating mothers in postpartum care centers in Seoul, Korea. Dietary intake during lactation was determined based on a 3-day dietary record. The mean zinc, copper, and iron concentrations in the human milk samples collected were 3.88 ± 1.74 mg/L, 0.69 ± 0.25 mg/L, and 5.85 ± 8.53 mg/L, respectively. The mothers who consumed alcoholic beverages during pregnancy had tended to have lower concentrations of zinc and copper, as well as significantly lower concentrations of iron, in their milk (p < 0.047). In contrast, the mothers who took daily supplements had much higher iron concentrations in their milk (p = 0.002). Dietary intakes of zinc, copper, and iron during lactation did not affect the concentrations of zinc, copper, and iron in the milk samples analyzed. Intakes of vitamin C, selenium, and iodine were associated with the concentration of copper in the milk samples analyzed, and consumption of food categorized as 'meat and meat products' was positively associated with the concentration of zinc. Consumption of rice was the top contributor to the concentrations of all three minerals. In conclusion, associations between maternal diet and nutrient concentrations in transitory human milk can provide useful information, particularly in regard to infant growth.Entities:
Keywords: Copper; Dietary intake; Human transitional milk; Iron; Zinc
Year: 2016 PMID: 26839873 PMCID: PMC4731858 DOI: 10.7762/cnr.2016.5.1.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Nutr Res ISSN: 2287-3732
General characteristics of the subjects and their baby (n = 96)
| Mean ± SD or N (%) | |
|---|---|
| Mothers | |
| Age, years | 31.8 ± 3.9* |
| Height, cm | 162.0 ± 4.8 |
| Present weight, kg | 60.6 ± 8.2 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.1 ± 2.8 |
| Weight gain in pregnancy, kg | 13.4 ± 5.3 |
| Supplement in pregnancy | |
| Yes | 79 (82.3)† |
| No | 17 (17.7) |
| Supplement type | |
| Mineral supplement | 53 (55.2) |
| Mineral supplement and vitamins | 26 (27.1) |
| None | 17 (17.7) |
| Supplement intake frequency | |
| Daily | 64 (66.7) |
| Non-Daily | 15 (15.6) |
| None | 17 (17.7) |
| Smoking before pregnancy | |
| Yes | 11 (11.5) |
| No | 85 (88.5) |
| Drinking in pregnancy | |
| Yes | 14 (14.6) |
| No | 82 (85.4) |
| Newborn infants | |
| Age, days | 11.2 ± 2.8 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 50 (52.1) |
| Female | 46 (47.9) |
| Birth weight, kg | 3.2 ± 0.4 |
BMI: body mass index (kg/m2), Mineral supplement: calcium supplement, iron supplement, or multi-mineral supplement, Non-Daily: Under once or twice per week.
*Values are Mean ± SD; †Values are N (%).
Analysis of zinc, copper, and iron levels in transitional human milk and comparison with reported studies
| Reference | Country | Stage of lactation | Zinc, mg/L | Copper, mg/L | Iron, mg/L | Ref. No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present study | Korea | 5-15 day | 3.88 ± 1.74* | 0.69 ± 0.25 | 0.21§ | |
| (0.80-10.00)† | (0.08-1.50) | (0.05-34.00) | ||||
| Similar study about transitory milk | ||||||
| Trugo et al., 1988 | Brazil | 6-36 day | 0.90 | [ | ||
| Friel et al., 1999 | Canada | 7 day | 0.85 | [ | ||
| 14 day | 0.82 | |||||
| Mendelson et al., 1982 | Canada | 8-10 day | 0.73 | [ | ||
| Arnaud and Fabier et al., 1995 | France | Transitory | 5.03 | 0.95 | 0.31 | [ |
| Sann et al., 1981 | France | 7-14 day | 0.63 | [ | ||
| Dorner et al., 1989 | Germany | 2.06 | 0.83 | 0.43 | [ | |
| Leotsinidis et al., 2005 | Greece | 14 day | 2.99 | 0.39 | 0.46 | [ |
| Tripathi et al., 1999 | India | 1.77 | 1.95 | [ | ||
| Aquilio et al.,1996 | Italy | 2-6 day | 0.27 | 0.26 | [ | |
| 12-16 day | ||||||
| Perrone et al., 1994 | Italy | 1 week | 0.49 | 0.62 | [ | |
| 1-2 week | 0.36 | 0.46 | ||||
| Kwon et al., 2004 | Korea | Transitory | 2.92‡ | 0.87 | [ | |
| Kim et al., 2004 | Korea | 7-15 day | 3.7 | 0.43 | 0.48 | [ |
| Lee et al., 2000 | Korea | 0.5 month | 3.94 | 0.61 | [ | |
| Yang et al., 1995 | Korea | 7 day | 4.2 | [ | ||
| Choi et al., 1991 | Korea | 7 day | 3.5 | 0.34 | 0.32 | [ |
| 14 day | 3.4 | 0.32 | 0.28 | |||
| Atinmo and Omololu et al., 1982 | Nigeria | 1 week | 0.34 | 0.59 | [ | |
| 1-2 week | 0.31 | 0.46 | ||||
| Wasowicz et al., 2001 | Poland | Transitory | 0.37 | 0.39 | [ | |
| Jirapinyo et al., 1985 | Thailand | 7-28 day | 0.42 | [ | ||
| Turan et al., 2001 | Turkey | Transitory | 0.60-8.70 | 0.10-3.60 | 0.20-4.00 | [ |
| Parr et al., 1996 | Turkey | Transitory | 0.70-2.61 | 0.19-0.31 | 0.35-0.72 | [ |
| Lemons et al., 1982 | UK | 7-56 day | 0.04 | [ | ||
| Casey et al., 1989 | US | Transitory | 0.59-1.33 | 0.12-28.28 | [ | |
| Moran et al., 1983 | US | 6-10 day | 1.04 | [ |
All units of values are converted to mg/L.
*Values are Mean ± SD; †Values are Minimum–Maximum; ‡Values are Mean; §Values are median only for iron in the present study.
Zinc, copper, and iron concentrations in human transitional milk according to alcohol drinking and mineral supplement intake
| Zinc, mg/L | Copper, mg/L | Iron, mg/L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol drinking in pregnancy | ||||||
| Yes (n = 14) | 0.38 ± 0.18 | p = 0.136 | 0.67 ± 0.24 | p = 0.136 | 5.12 ± 7.96 | p = 0.047 |
| No (n = 82) | 0.45 ± 0.16 | 0.79 ± 0.29 | 10.10 ± 10.67 | |||
| Mineral supplement intake frequency during pregnancy | ||||||
| Daily (n = 64) | 0.36 ± 0.18 | p = 0.280 | 0.69 ± 0.27 | p = 0.717 | 7.36 ± 9.10 | p = 0.002 |
| Non daily (n = 15) | 0.40 ± 0.17 | 0.70 ± 0.22 | 2.83 ± 6.36 | |||
Values are concentration of zinc, copper and iron in breast milk according to lifestyle of mothers (Mean ± SD). Comparison between two groups by t-test for zinc and copper, but Wilcoxon rank sum for Iron.
Mineral supplement: calcium supplement or iron supplement or multi-mineral supplement, Non daily: Under once or twice per a weeks.
Correlations between daily nutrient intakes during lactation and zinc, copper and iron concentrations in human milk (n = 96)
| Daily intakes | %RDA | Zinc | Copper | Iron | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficients | p-value | Correlation coefficients | p-value | Correlation coefficients | p-value | |||
| Nutrients | ||||||||
| Energy, kcal | 2092.0 ± 314.7 | 92.0* | -0.003 | 0.980 | 0.130 | 0.214 | 0.113 | 0.283 |
| Protein, g | 91.5 ± 18.3 | 130.7 | 0.077 | 0.464 | -0.054 | 0.604 | 0.030 | 0.772 |
| Fat, g | 74.5 ± 33.6 | - | 0.022 | 0.835 | 0.154 | 0.141 | 0.215 | 0.038 |
| Carbohydrate, g | 324.8 ± 291.7 | - | -0.023 | 0.827 | 0.031 | 0.766 | 0.077 | 0.462 |
| Cholesterol, mg | 405.2 ± 1115.9 | - | -0.029 | 0.785 | -0.087 | 0.409 | 0.137 | 0.191 |
| Dietary fiber, g | 31.6 ± 7.0 | 126.5 | 0.040 | 0.705 | 0.113 | 0.280 | -0.022 | 0.834 |
| Vitamin A, µg RE | 1132.0 ± 355.0 | 99.3 | 0.101 | 0.335 | -0.141 | 0.179 | -0.100 | 0.343 |
| Retinol, µg | 149.9 ± 252.6 | - | 0.015 | 0.886 | 0.176 | 0.091 | 0.065 | 0.539 |
| β-carotene, µg | 6138.0 ± 1998.0 | - | 0.113 | 0.281 | -0.136 | 0.193 | -0.102 | 0.332 |
| Vitamin B1, mg | 4.4 ± 20.6 | 294.2 | 0.014 | 0.891 | 0.171 | 0.102 | 0.083 | 0.430 |
| Vitamin B2, mg | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 98.2 | -0.047 | 0.653 | -0.046 | 0.661 | -0.052 | 0.623 |
| Niacin, mg | 20.6 ± 4.6 | 108.2 | 0.017 | 0.873 | -0.038 | 0.718 | 0.039 | 0.708 |
| Vitamin B6, mg | 2.5 ± 3.2 | 112.8 | 0.005 | 0.956 | 0.143 | 0.170 | -0.057 | 0.587 |
| Folate, µg | 587.4 ± 144.0 | 106.8 | 0.029 | 0.782 | -0.053 | 0.616 | 0.127 | 0.225 |
| Vitamin C, mg | 122.4 ± 75.5 | 90.7 | 0.036 | 0.734 | 0.236 | 0.022 | 0.021 | 0.843 |
| Vitamin E, mg | 27.9 ± 6.7 | 214.5† | 0.023 | 0.825 | -0.029 | 0.781 | 0.201 | 0.054 |
| Calcium, mg | 659.5 ± 171.6 | 64.7 | 0.081 | 0.438 | 0.001 | 0.999 | 0.025 | 0.811 |
| Phosphorus, mg | 1287.0 ± 266.1 | 183.9 | 0.040 | 0.701 | -0.029 | 0.782 | 0.037 | 0.726 |
| Iron, mg | 23.2 ± 15.5 | 165.3 | -0.002 | 0.981 | 0.129 | 0.217 | -0.195 | 0.062 |
| Potassium, mg | 4084.0 ± 846.1 | 104.7† | 0.071 | 0.501 | -0.045 | 0.671 | 0.047 | 0.653 |
| Sodium, mg | 6345.0 ± 1334.0 | 423.0† | 0.048 | 0.651 | -0.080 | 0.445 | 0.112 | 0.287 |
| Zinc, mg | 12.5 ± 2.2 | 96.3 | 0.037 | 0.723 | 0.064 | 0.542 | -0.097 | 0.354 |
| Copper, mg | 1.8 ± 1.9 | 144.1 | -0.004 | 0.972 | 0.138 | 0.187 | -0.075 | 0.478 |
| Magnesium, mg | 190.5 ± 668.7 | 68.1 | 0.008 | 0.942 | 0.166 | 0.112 | 0.194 | 0.062 |
| Selenium, µg | 159.2 ± 227.4 | 244.9 | 0.041 | 0.694 | 0.232 | 0.025 | -0.101 | 0.337 |
| Manganese, mg | 4.3 ± 1.4 | 121.8† | 0.010 | 0.928 | 0.133 | 0.203 | -0.170 | 0.103 |
| Chlorine, mg | 533.1 ± 1089.0 | 23.2† | -0.003 | 0.979 | 0.186 | 0.075 | 0.175 | 0.094 |
| Iodine, µg | 1699.0 ± 465.0 | 514.9 | 0.165 | 0.115 | -0.267 | 0.013 | 0.060 | 0.567 |
Analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficient for zinc and copper, but Spearman's rank correlation for Iron. Adjusted for age, weight experience of drinking, and supplement.
RDA: Recommended dietary intake by dietary reference intake of Korean 2010.
*Estimated energy requirements by dietary reference intake of Korean 2010; †Adequate intake by dietary reference intake of Korean 2010.
Correlations between food intakes by groups during lactation and zinc, copper and iron concentrations in human milk (n = 96)
| Daily intakes | Zinc | Copper | Iron | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficients | p-value | Correlation coefficients | p-value | Correlation coefficients | p-value | ||
| Food groups | |||||||
| Meat and meat products, g | 114.1 ± 37.9 | 0.206 | 0.048 | -0.071 | 0.500 | -0.054 | 0.607 |
| Fish and fish products, g | 99.4 ± 35.6 | 0.135 | 0.196 | -0.083 | 0.432 | -0.187 | 0.073 |
| Egg and egg products, g | 28.6 ± 7.3 | -0.177 | 0.090 | 0.041 | 0.694 | 0.009 | 0.934 |
| Milk and milk products, g | 20.9 ± 20.8 | 0.095 | 0.366 | 0.045 | 0.648 | -0.079 | 0.452 |
| Cereals and Cereal products, g | 319.7 ± 88.0 | 0.074 | 0.479 | 0.031 | 0.772 | 0.121 | 0.246 |
| Potatoes and starch products, g | 55.4 ± 34.0 | -0.191 | 0.066 | 0.135 | 0.197 | -0.138 | 0.186 |
| Sugar and sugar products, g | 11.6 ± 4.4 | -0.023 | 0.827 | 0.031 | 0.766 | 0.077 | 0.462 |
| Beans and bean products, g | 174.7 ±100.3 | -0.093 | 0.374 | -0.109 | 0.297 | 0.058 | 0.584 |
| Nut, seeds and products, g | 12.6 ±13.4 | 0.118 | 0.260 | -0.066 | 0.531 | -0.038 | 0.712 |
| Vegetables, g | 423.0 ±137.0 | 0.086 | 0.414 | 0.098 | 0.352 | -0.090 | 0.391 |
| Fruits, g | 115.8 ± 58.3 | -0.035 | 0.740 | 0.048 | 0.649 | 0.148 | 0.158 |
| Mushrooms, g | 21.3 ±16.9 | -0.086 | 0.412 | -0.149 | 0.155 | 0.112 | 0.285 |
| Seaweeds, g | 16.5 ± 4.1 | 0.124 | 0.235 | 0.048 | 0.650 | -0.007 | 0.948 |
| Fats and oils, g | 23.1 ± 6.5 | 0.201 | 0.053 | -0.002 | 0.986 | -0.195 | 0.061 |
| Beverage, g | 2.7 ± 5.3 | 0.032 | 0.760 | -0.019 | 0.860 | 0.389 | <0.001 |
| Animal group total, g | 263.1 ± 73.6 | 0.194 | 0.063 | -0.039 | 0.712 | -0.169 | 0.106 |
| Plant group total, g | 1174.0 ± 238.9 | 0.010 | 0.925 | 0.040 | 0.707 | 0.048 | 0.647 |
| Total, g | 1437.0 ± 286.0 | 0.058 | 0.581 | 0.023 | 0.827 | -0.005 | 0.963 |
Analyzed by Pearson's correlation method for zinc and copper, but Spearman's rank correlation for Iron. Adjusted for age, weight experience of drinking, and supplement.
Cumulative %contribution and cumulative R2 of top 20 for zinc, copper, and iron intakes
| Zinc | Copper | Iron | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food item | Cum% | No | Food item | Cum R2 | Food item | Cum% | No | Food item | Cum R2 | Food item | Cum% | No | Food item | Cum R2 |
| Rice | 25.5 | 1 | Soy bean sauce | 0.23 | Rice | 21.4 | 1 | Lemon | 0.57 | Rice | 15.0 | 1 | Lemon | 0.56 |
| Beef | 35.8 | 2 | Wheat flour | 0.34 | Soy milk | 33.0 | 2 | Bread with jam | 0.88 | Beef | 25.9 | 2 | Bread with jam | 0.84 |
| Pork | 40.9 | 3 | Raw seaweed | 0.40 | Cucumber | 36.7 | 3 | Fly fish caviar | 0.98 | Dried seaweed | 31.7 | 3 | Fly fish caviar | 0.94 |
| Dried seaweed | 44.7 | 4 | Cockle | 0.46 | Red bean | 39.6 | 4 | Salt | 0.98 | Soy milk | 37.3 | 4 | Salt | 0.95 |
| Soy milk | 47.4 | 5 | Shrimp | 0.53 | Shrimp | 42.4 | 5 | Soy milk | 0.98 | Pumpkin | 39.7 | 5 | Pie | 0.96 |
| Red bean | 50.0 | 6 | Lemon | 0.58 | Egg | 45.2 | 6 | Webfoot octopus | 0.99 | Clam | 41.7 | 6 | Tofu | 0.97 |
| Egg | 52.5 | 7 | Tofu | 0.62 | Beef | 47.6 | 7 | Shrimp | 0.99 | Red bean | 43.5 | 7 | Ginger | 0.97 |
| Chicken | 54.5 | 8 | Gelatin | 0.65 | Oyster | 49.7 | 8 | Perilla | 0.99 | Egg | 45.1 | 8 | Beet root | 0.98 |
| Shrimp | 56.5 | 9 | Salt | 0.67 | Sweet potato | 51.6 | 9 | Chestnut | 0.99 | Soy bean sauce | 46.7 | 9 | Spaghetti | 0.98 |
| Tomato | 58.1 | 10 | Bamboo shoot | 0.69 | Tofu | 53.5 | 10 | Eggplant | 0.99 | Cucumber | 48.2 | 10 | Trunk of sweet potato | 0.98 |
| Squid | 59.4 | 11 | Walnut | 0.71 | Potato | 55.4 | 11 | Mushroom soup | 0.99 | Red pepper | 49.6 | 11 | Soy oil | 0.98 |
| Tofu | 60.7 | 12 | Radish | 0.72 | Perilla | 57.1 | 12 | Dried seaweed | 0.99 | Canned tuna | 51.0 | 12 | Raw lettuce | 0.98 |
| Cucumber | 61.9 | 13 | Pepper | 0.74 | Spaghetti | 58.7 | 13 | Bamboo shoot | 0.99 | Spinach | 52.3 | 13 | Oyster mushroom | 0.98 |
| Soy bean sauce | 63.0 | 14 | Crown daisy | 0.75 | Sesame | 60.2 | 14 | Pear | 0.99 | Tofu | 53.5 | 14 | Button mushroom | 0.98 |
| Corn | 64.1 | 15 | Dried lettuce | 0.77 | Squid | 61.6 | 15 | Pork | 0.99 | Shrimp | 54.8 | 15 | Peanut oil | 0.99 |
| Sandwich | 65.2 | 16 | Spaghetti | 0.79 | Button mushroom | 62.9 | 16 | Mustard sauce | 0.99 | Radish | 56.0 | 16 | Laver | 0.99 |
| Pumpkin | 66.2 | 17 | Salmon | 0.80 | Mung bean | 64.2 | 17 | Yogurt | 0.99 | Pork | 57.1 | 17 | Tomato | 0.99 |
| Perilla | 67.2 | 18 | Ginger | 0.81 | Garlic | 65.4 | 18 | Raw lettuce | 0.99 | Mussel | 58.3 | 18 | Potato starch | 0.99 |
| Yangjangpi | 68.2 | 19 | Pear | 0.82 | Pork | 66.5 | 19 | Konjak | 1.00 | Spaghetti | 59.5 | 19 | Peach | 0.99 |
| Oyster | 69.1 | 20 | Mandarin | 0.83 | Soy bean paste | 67.6 | 20 | Italian dressing | 1.00 | Perilla | 60.6 | 20 | Cucumber | 0.99 |
Analyzed by stepwise multiple regression.
Cum%: cumulative contribution percent, Cum R2: cumulative R2 of regression analysis.