Literature DB >> 26839521

The 4Kscore® Test Reduces Prostate Biopsy Rates in Community and Academic Urology Practices.

Badrinath Konety1, Stephen M Zappala2, Dipen J Parekh3, Danielle Osterhout4, Jeffrey Schock4, Randy M Chudler4, Gregory M Oldford4, Kenneth M Kernen4, Jason Hafron4.   

Abstract

There is significant concern regarding prostate cancer screening because of the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men who are discovered to have abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) results. The 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Diagnostics, LLC) is a blood test that utilizes four kallikrein levels plus clinical information in an algorithm to calculate an individual's percentage risk (< 1% to > 95%) for aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7) on prostate biopsy. The 4Kscore Test, as a follow-up test after abnormal PSA and/or DRE test results, has been shown to improve the specificity for predicting the risk of aggressive prostate cancer and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. A clinical utility study was conducted to assess the influence of the 4Kscore Test on the decision to perform prostate biopsies in men referred to urologists for abnormal PSA and/or DRE results. The study population included 611 patients seen by 35 academic and community urologists in the United States. Urologists ordered the 4Kscore Test as part of their assessment of men referred for abnormal PSA and/or DRE test results. Results for the patients were stratified into low risk (< 7.5%), intermediate risk (7.5%-19.9%), and high risk (≥ 20%) for aggressive prostate cancer. The 4Kscore Test results influenced biopsy decisions in 88.7% of the men. Performing the 4Kscore Test resulted in a 64.6% reduction in prostate biopsies in patients; the actual percentage of cases not proceeding to biopsy were 94.0%, 52.9%, and 19.0% for men who had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk 4Kscore Test results, respectively. A higher 4Kscore Test was associated with greater likelihood of having a prostate biopsy (P < 0.001). Among the 171 patients who had a biopsy, the 4Kscore risk category is strongly associated with biopsy pathology. The 4Kscore Test, as a follow-up test for an abnormal PSA and/or DRE results, significantly influenced the physician and patient shared decision in clinical practice, which led to a reduction in prostate biopsies while increasing the probability of detecting aggressive cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4Kscore Test; Biopsy rate; Digital rectal examination; Gleason score; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer prognosis; Prostate-specific antigen

Year:  2015        PMID: 26839521      PMCID: PMC4735670     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  28 in total

1.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Patricia M Gallagher; Jonathan S Skinner; Floyd J Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Angel Cronin; Monique Roobol; Caroline Savage; Mari Peltola; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Fritz Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Peter R Carroll; J Kellogg Parsons; Gerald Andriole; Robert R Bahnson; Daniel A Barocas; Erik P Castle; William J Catalona; Douglas M Dahl; John W Davis; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Thomas Farrington; George P Hemstreet; Mark H Kawachi; Paul H Lange; Kevin R Loughlin; William Lowrance; Paul Maroni; James Mohler; Todd M Morgan; Robert B Nadler; Michael Poch; Chuck Scales; Terrence M Shaneyfelt; Marc C Smaldone; Geoffrey Sonn; Preston Sprenke; Andrew J Vickers; Robert Wake; Dorothy A Shead; Deborah Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Aniko Szabo; Seth Falcon; Jake Wegelin; Dante DiTommaso; Kent Karnofski; Roman Gulati; David F Penson; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Resnick; Tatsuki Koyama; Kang-Hsien Fan; Peter C Albertsen; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; R Lawrence Van Horn; David F Penson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Symptoms, unmet needs, psychological well-being and health status in survivors of prostate cancer: implications for redesigning follow-up.

Authors:  Eila Watson; Bethany Shinkins; Emma Frith; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Fiona Walter; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson; Sara Faithfull; Jane Wolstenholme; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Christof Kastner; Christine Campbell; Richard Neal; Hugh Butcher; Mike Matthews; Rafael Perera; Peter Rose
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  A Gupta; M J Roobol; C J Savage; M Peltola; K Pettersson; P T Scardino; A J Vickers; F H Schröder; H Lilja
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  18 in total

1.  Clinical performance of the 4Kscore Test to predict high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy: A meta-analysis of us and European clinical validation study results.

Authors:  Stephen M Zappala; Peter T Scardino; David Okrongly; Vincent Linder; Yan Dong
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

2.  Utilization of individualized prostate cancer and genomic biomarkers for the practicing urologist.

Authors:  Gregory C McMahon; Gordon A Brown; Thomas J Mueller
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

3.  Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan So; Phillipe Violette; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Use of the 4Kscore test to predict the risk of aggressive prostate cancer prior to prostate biopsy: Overall cost savings and improved quality of care to the us healthcare system.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Yan Dong; Vincent Linder; Stephen Zappala
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017.

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Liquid biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer and summary of available data for their use in African-American men.

Authors:  Grant M Henning; Gerald L Andriole; Eric H Kim
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 ng/ml and Above.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Monique J Roobol; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Hugosson; Jenny L Donovan; Arnauld Villers; Stephen Zappala; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Developing an effective strategy to improve the detection of significant prostate cancer by combining the 4Kscore and multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Karim Marzouk; Behfar Ehdaie; Emily Vertosick; Stephen Zappala; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  Beyond prostate-specific antigen: utilizing novel strategies to screen men for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 10.  Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  James L Liu; Hiten D Patel; Nora M Haney; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.