| Literature DB >> 26838958 |
Bin Feng1, Issei Sugiyama1, Hajime Hojo2, Hiromichi Ohta3, Naoya Shibata1, Yuichi Ikuhara1,4,5.
Abstract
Material performance is significantly governed by grain boundaries (GBs), a typical crystal defects inside, which often exhibit unique properties due to the structural and chemical inhomogeneity. Here, it is reported direct atomic scale evidence that oxygen vacancies formed in the GBs can modify the local surface oxygen dynamics in CeO2, a key material for fuel cells. The atomic structures and oxygen vacancy concentrations in individual GBs are obtained by electron microscopy and theoretical calculations at atomic scale. Meanwhile, local GB oxygen reduction reactivity is measured by electrochemical strain microscopy. By combining these techniques, it is demonstrated that the GB electrochemical activities are affected by the oxygen vacancy concentrations, which is, on the other hand, determined by the local structural distortions at the GB core region. These results provide critical understanding of GB properties down to atomic scale, and new perspectives on the development strategies of high performance electrochemical devices for solid oxide fuel cells.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26838958 PMCID: PMC4738319 DOI: 10.1038/srep20288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Atomic structures of model GBs obtained by HAADF STEM and theoretical calculations.
(a–e) HAADF STEM images obtained from the model GBs: (a) Σ9 GB, (b) Σ11 GB, (c) Σ13 GB, (d) Σ3 GB and (e) Σ5 GB. The bright spots in these images correspond to the Ce atomic columns. Theoretically predicted GB models are overlaid in the right part of each STEM images. Green circle represents Ce, which shows good agreement between theoretical calculations and experimental images. It should be noted that stoichiometry GB models were shown in (a,d), while nonstoichiometric GB models were used in (b,c,e). Red rectangular region shown in each image is the unit used for EELS analysis. We took three times, twice, three times, five times and five times of the area shown from (a–e) along the GB direction, respectively. Scale bar, 0.5 nm.
Figure 2EEL spectra and their M5/M4 ratios for the model GBs.
(a) Ce M4,5 edge EEL spectra obtained from the area shown in Figure 1b, (b) the M5/M4 ratios calculated by the positive part of second derivative of the spectrums in Figure 2a. The pink area is the bulk value taken from the bulk region of all model GBs. * from Ref 20, ** from Ref 19 and *** from Ref 29.
Correlation between the degree of distortion and the oxygen vacancy concentrations in each model GB.
| GB type | Structural distortion [nm−2] | Oxygen vacancy densities | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stoichiometric | Nonstoichiometric | ||
| Σ3[110]/{111} | 8.5 | — | 0 |
| Σ9[110]/{221} | 13.8 | — | 0 |
| Σ11[110]/{332} | 14.8 | 11.1 | 1.5 |
| Σ13[001]/{510} | 16.1 | 9.4 | 2.7 |
| Σ5[001]/{210} | 17.8 | 13.9 | 3.0 |
The density of oxygen coordination deficient sites projected to each GB plane was calculated as a measure of structural distortion for both the stoichiometric GB and nonstoichiometric GB, while the density of oxygen vacancy projected to each GB plane obtained from EELS was shown as a measure of oxygen vacancy concentrations.
adata from ref. 20.
bdata from ref. 19.
Figure 3ESM mapping near model GBs.
(a–e) ESM response of the model GBs of Σ9 GB (a), Σ11 GB (b), Σ13 GB (c), Σ3 GB (d) and Σ5 GB (e). The GB areas are indicated in between the two arrows in each figure. Scale bar, 200 nm.