Literature DB >> 26838923

Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration.

Roman A Perez1, Gemma Mestres2.   

Abstract

Biomaterials in the form of scaffolds hold great promise in the regeneration of diseased tissues. The scaffolds stimulate cellular adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. While the scaffold composition will dictate their biocompatibility, their porosity plays a key role in allowing proper cell penetration, nutrient diffusion as well as bone ingrowth. Porous scaffolds are processed with the help of a wide variety of techniques. Designing scaffolds with the appropriate porosity is a complex issue since this may jeopardize other physico-chemical properties. From a macroscopic point of view, parameters such as the overall architecture, pore morphology, interconnectivity and pore size distribution, have unique roles in allowing bone ingrowth to take place. From a microscopic perspective, the adsorption and retention of proteins in the microporosities of the material will dictate the subsequent cell adhesion. Therefore, the microstructure of the substrate can determine cell proliferation as well as the expression of specific osteogenic genes. This review aims at discussing the effect of micro- and macroporosity on the physico-chemical and biological properties of scaffolds for musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Macroporosity; Microporosity; Microstructure; Pore size; Porosity; Rapid prototyping; Scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26838923     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  44 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Multimaterial Segmented Fiber Printing for Gradient Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Luis Diaz-Gomez; Brandon T Smith; Panayiotis D Kontoyiannis; Sean M Bittner; Anthony J Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Substrate Stress-Relaxation Regulates Scaffold Remodeling and Bone Formation In Vivo.

Authors:  Max Darnell; Simon Young; Luo Gu; Nisarg Shah; Evi Lippens; James Weaver; Georg Duda; David Mooney
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Brandon T Smith; Luis Diaz-Gomez; Carrigan D Hudgins; Anthony J Melchiorri; David W Scott; John P Fisher; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Nanohydroxyapatite, Nanosilicate-Reinforced Injectable, and Biomimetic Gelatin-Methacryloyl Hydrogel for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Zhe Shi; Qiang Zhong; Yuhang Chen; Jian Gao; Xin Pan; Qiang Lian; Rong Chen; Pinkai Wang; Jian Wang; Zhanjun Shi; Hao Cheng
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-08-16

6.  Macropore Regulation of Hydroxyapatite Osteoinduction via Microfluidic Pathway.

Authors:  Feng Shi; Xin Fang; Teng Zhou; Xu Huang; Ke Duan; Jianxin Wang; Shuxin Qu; Wei Zhi; Jie Weng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Mario Ledda; Miriam Merco; Antonio Sciortino; Elisa Scatena; Annalisa Convertino; Antonella Lisi; Costantino Del Gaudio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Ethan L Nyberg; Ashley L Farris; Ben P Hung; Miguel Dias; Juan R Garcia; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Role of organic and ceramic biomaterials on bone healing and regeneration: An experimental study with significant value in translational tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ali Moshiri; Neda Tekyieh Maroof; Ali Mohammad Sharifi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.699

10.  Ceramic Biomaterial Pores Stereology Analysis by the Use of Microtomography.

Authors:  Żaneta Garczyk; Zbigniew Jaegermann; Piotr Duda; Andrzej S Swinarew; Sebastian Stach
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.