Akinori Sairaku1, Yukihiko Yoshida2, Yukiko Nakano3, Mayuho Maeda2, Haruo Hirayama2, Haruki Hashimoto4, Yasuki Kihara3. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan rjrgw059@ybb.ne.jp. 2. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan. 4. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan Department of Cardiology, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Abstract
AIMS: A worldwide survey reported that the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was higher in high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. We tested whether the procedure volume of each operator was associated with the outcome of AF ablation in high-volume centres. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 471 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for the first time in three cardiovascular centers where the annual AF ablation volume was >100 procedures. We classified a total of 10 primary operators according to their operation volume on the basis of ACC/AHA/ACP CLINICAL COMPETENCE STATEMENT; high-volume operator (≥50 cases/year, N = 3) or low-volume operator (<50 cases/year, N = 7). The patients included were dichotomized according to the annual operation volume of their attending physician. The endpoints were the freedom from AF recurrence 1 year after the ablation, major complications including thromboembolisms, massive bleeding or death, and the procedural duration. RESULTS: A complete isolation of the four PVs was achieved in 99.1%. The freedom from AF recurrence was more common in patients treated by high-volume operators than those treated by low-volume operators (165/216 [76.4%] vs. 160/255 [62.8%]; P = 0.001). A high-volume operator was the only independent predictor of the freedom from AF recurrence (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.23-2.48; P = 0.002). The patients treated by high-volume operators were less likely to have major complications (1.4% vs. 7.8%; P = 0.001), and had a shorter procedural duration (139.9 ± 25.3 vs. 149.3 ± 27.1 min; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Operator proficiency may predict the outcome after AF ablation even in high-volume centres. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: A worldwide survey reported that the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was higher in high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. We tested whether the procedure volume of each operator was associated with the outcome of AF ablation in high-volume centres. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 471 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for the first time in three cardiovascular centers where the annual AF ablation volume was >100 procedures. We classified a total of 10 primary operators according to their operation volume on the basis of ACC/AHA/ACP CLINICAL COMPETENCE STATEMENT; high-volume operator (≥50 cases/year, N = 3) or low-volume operator (<50 cases/year, N = 7). The patients included were dichotomized according to the annual operation volume of their attending physician. The endpoints were the freedom from AF recurrence 1 year after the ablation, major complications including thromboembolisms, massive bleeding or death, and the procedural duration. RESULTS: A complete isolation of the four PVs was achieved in 99.1%. The freedom from AF recurrence was more common in patients treated by high-volume operators than those treated by low-volume operators (165/216 [76.4%] vs. 160/255 [62.8%]; P = 0.001). A high-volume operator was the only independent predictor of the freedom from AF recurrence (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.23-2.48; P = 0.002). The patients treated by high-volume operators were less likely to have major complications (1.4% vs. 7.8%; P = 0.001), and had a shorter procedural duration (139.9 ± 25.3 vs. 149.3 ± 27.1 min; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Operator proficiency may predict the outcome after AF ablation even in high-volume centres. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Rosita Zakeri; David R Van Wagoner; Hugh Calkins; Tom Wong; Heather M Ross; E Kevin Heist; Timothy E Meyer; Peter R Kowey; Robert J Mentz; John G Cleland; Bertram Pitt; Faiez Zannad; Cecilia Linde Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Nigar Z Gasimova; Anatoly A Nechepurenko; Evgeny B Kropotkin; Eduard A Ivanitsky; Grigorii V Kolunin; Dmitry A Shavshin; Bor Antolic; Elena A Artyukhina; Ayan S Abdrakhmanov; Konstantin S Korolev; Dmitry S Lebedev; Evgeny N Mikhaylov Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Ellen Hoffmann; Florian Straube; Karl Wegscheider; Malte Kuniss; Dietrich Andresen; Li-Qun Wu; Jürgen Tebbenjohanns; Georg Noelker; Roland Richard Tilz; Julian Kyoung Ryul Chun; Andreas Franke; Christoph Stellbrink; Arcadi Garcia-Alberola; Uwe Dorwarth; Andreas Metzner; Taoufik Ouarrak; Johannes Brachmann; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Jochen Senges Journal: Europace Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Karen P Phillips; Evgeny Pokushalov; Aleksandr Romanov; Sergey Artemenko; Richard J Folkeringa; Tamas Szili-Torok; Gaetano Senatore; Kenneth M Stein; Omar Razali; Nicole Gordon; Lucas V A Boersma Journal: Europace Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.214