| Literature DB >> 26838503 |
Toru Nishizawa1, Nobuyoshi Nakajima1, Masanori Tamaoki1, Mitsuko Aono1, Akihiro Kubo1, Hikaru Saji1.
Abstract
Previously, we conducted a roadside survey to reveal the occurrence of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape along a Japanese roadside (Route 51). In this study, we performed successive and thorough fixed-route monitoring in 5 sections along another road (Route 23). Oilseed rape plants were detected on both sides of the road in each section between autumn 2009 and winter 2013, which included 3 flowering seasons. In four sections, more plants were found on the side of the road leading from the Yokkaichi port than on the opposite side. In the fifth section, the presence of clogged drains on the roadside, where juvenile plants concentrated, caused the opposite distribution: oilseed rape predominantly occurred along the inbound lanes (leading to the Yokkaichi port) in 2010 and 2012. Unlike in our previous survey, glyphosate- or glufosinate-resistant oilseed rape plants were abundant (>75% of analyzed plants over 3 years). Moreover, a few individuals bearing both herbicide resistance traits were also detected in some sections. The spillage of imported seeds may explain the occurrence of oilseed rape on the roadside. The abundance of herbicide-resistant oilseed rape plants may reflect the extent of contamination with GM oilseed rape seed within imports.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica napus; GM plants; environmental concern; fixed-route monitoring; genetically modified crop; herbicide resistance; oilseed rape; roadside monitoring; seed spillage; seed transport
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26838503 PMCID: PMC5033165 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1138196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: GM Crops Food ISSN: 2164-5698 Impact factor: 3.074
Figure 1.Roadside sections along Route 23 used to detect the occurrence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) from October 21, 2009 to January 15, 2013. The monitored area is located on the west coast of Ise Bay south of the Yokkaichi port. Periodic censuses throughout the year and specimen collection for DNA analysis during the flowering season were conducted on both sides of the road at 5 locations indicated by black squares.
Figure 2.The numbers of oilseed rape plants observed on both sides of the road within 4 monitored sections, Shiohama, Suzuka, Shiroko, and Toyotsuueno, from October 21, 2009 to January 15, 2013. The dates of specimen collection for DNA analysis are denoted by asterisks. Each survey continued for 2 days; the date of each census is the first day of the survey.
Figure 3.The numbers of oilseed rape plants observed and the number of densely populated square ponds where juvenile plants concentrated on both sides of the road in the Kumozu section from October 21, 2009 to January 15, 2013. The dates of specimen collection for DNA analysis are denoted by asterisks. Each survey continued for 2 days; the date of each census is first day of the survey.
Figure 4.Typical habitats of oilseed rape plants in road structures and on the roadside along Route 23. (A) A joining section of the Kumozu-ohashi bridge. The steel frame of the bridge is at the road surface level. (B) A close-up view of a joining section of the Kumozu-ohashi bridge with accumulated mud and sand. (C) Oilseed rape seedlings growing in the mud accumulated at the bottom of the joint. (D) Seedlings and juvenile plants growing in the mud accumulated in a drain.(E) Densely populated square pond connected to the drain. (F) An adult plant flowering in a chink between asphalt pavement and curbstones. (G) An adult plant just before flowering in a crack in a curbstone. (H) An adult plant just before flowering in a crack in a rubber seal that coated a chink between curbstones to prevent weed growth.
Total numbers of oilseed rape plants, numbers of samples collected and analyzed, and numbers of herbicide-resistant individuals detected in the 5 monitored sections on both sides of Route 23 from 2010 to 2012
| Section | Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of each section (m) | 240 | 380 | 750 | 750 | 1,300 | 3,420 | |||||
| Lanes: out, outbound; in, inbound | out | in | out | in | out | in | out | in | out | in | (out, in) |
| Collection on April 1 and 2, 2010 | |||||||||||
| Total number of individuals | 50 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 54 | 15 | 213 | 746 | 1,112 |
| (345, 767) | |||||||||||
| Number of sampled oilseed rape plants | 50 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 51 | 10 | 199 | 408 | 752 |
| (328, 424) | |||||||||||
| Number of samples analyzed for GM traits | 44 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 35 | 10 | 158 | 188 | 460 |
| (257, 203) | |||||||||||
| Number of herbicide-resistant plants | 36 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | —* | 24 | 8 | 125 | 144 | 354 |
| (198, 156) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of herbicide-resistant plants (%) | 81.8 | 100 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | — | 68.6 | 80.0 | 79.1 | 76.6 | 77.0 |
| (77.0, 76.8) | |||||||||||
| Glyphosate-resistant plants | 16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | — | 10 | 6 | 43 | 52 | 136 |
| (78, 58) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of glyphosate-resistant plants (%) | 36.4 | 0 | 60.0 | 0 | 40.0 | — | 28.6 | 60.0 | 27.2 | 27.7 | 29.6 |
| (30.4, 28.6) | |||||||||||
| Glufosinate-resistant plants | 20 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | — | 14 | 2 | 79 | 84 | 207 |
| (117, 90) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of glufosinate-resistant plants (%) | 45.5 | 100 | 20.0 | 75.0 | 20.0 | — | 40.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 44.7 | 45.0 |
| (45.5, 44.3) | |||||||||||
| Double herbicide-resistant plants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| (3, 8) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of double herbicide- resistant plants (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 2.4 |
| (1.2, 3.9) | |||||||||||
| Collection: March 27 and 28, 2011 | |||||||||||
| Total number of individuals | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 8 | 403 | 204 | 653 |
| (434, 219) | |||||||||||
| Number of sampled oilseed rape plants | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 8 | 84 | 100 | 230 |
| (115, 115) | |||||||||||
| Number of samples analyzed for GM traits | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 8 | 84 | 100 | 230 |
| (115, 115) | |||||||||||
| Number of herbicide-resistant plants | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 58 | 80 | 173 |
| (79, 94) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of herbicide-resistant plants (%) | — | 100 | 66.7 | 100 | 83.3 | 66.7 | 63.6 | 100 | 69.0 | 80.0 | 75.2 |
| (68.7, 81.7) | |||||||||||
| Glyphosate-resistant plants | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 27 | 38 | 83 |
| (38, 45) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of glyphosate-resistant plants (%) | — | 0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 36.4 | 62.5 | 32.1 | 38.0 | 36.1 |
| (33.0, 39.1) | |||||||||||
| Glufosinate-resistant plants | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 30 | 42 | 88 |
| (39, 49) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of glufosinate-resistant plants (%) | — | 100 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 22.7 | 37.5 | 35.7 | 42.0 | 38.3 |
| (33.9, 42.6) | |||||||||||
| Double herbicide-resistant plants | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| (2, 0) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of double herbicide- resistant plants (%) | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.5 | 0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.87 |
| (0.87, 0) | |||||||||||
| Collection: April 12 and 13, 2012 | |||||||||||
| Total number of individuals | 6 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 4 | 31 | 15 | 264 | 602 | 944 |
| (318, 626) | |||||||||||
| Number of sampled oilseed rape plants | 6 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 4 | 31 | 15 | 158 | 159 | 395 |
| (212, 183) | |||||||||||
| Number of samples analyzed for GM traits | 6 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 4 | 31 | 15 | 158 | 159 | 395 |
| (212, 183) | |||||||||||
| Number of herbicide-resistant plants | 6 | — | 2 | 4 | 14 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 122 | 124 | 307 |
| (162, 145) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of herbicide-resistant plants (%) | 100 | — | 100 | 80.0 | 93.3 | 75.0 | 58.1 | 93.3 | 77.2 | 78.0 | 77.7 |
| (76.4, 79.2) | |||||||||||
| Glyphosate-resistant plants | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 47 | 47 | 116 |
| (62, 54) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of glyphosate-resistant plants (%) | 16.7 | — | 0 | 20.0 | 33.3 | 0 | 29.0 | 40.0 | 29.7 | 29.6 | 29.4 |
| (29.2, 29.5) | |||||||||||
| Glufosinate-resistant plants | 5 | — | 2 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 75 | 75 | 188 |
| (100, 88) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of glufosinate-resistant plants (%) | 83.3 | — | 100 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 29.0 | 46.7 | 47.5 | 47.2 | 47.6 |
| (47.2, 48.1) | |||||||||||
| Double herbicide-resistant plants | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| (0, 3) | |||||||||||
| Proportion of double herbicide- resistant plants (%) | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | 0 | 1.3 | 0.76 |
| (0, 0.76) | |||||||||||
*Hyphens mean that no oilseed rape plants were found at the roadside of lanes.
Statistics of oilseed rape seeds import into Japan from Canada, Australia (2 most active exporters), and other countries in 2009—2014
| Year | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total amount of import [A]a | 2,072,402 | 2,344,304 | 2,318,994 | 2,408,423 | 2,461,041 | 2,411,348 |
| Canada total | 1,957,239 | 2,145,095 | 2,260,447 | 2,331,636 | 2,309,279 | 2,243,361 |
| Proportion of import from Canada (%) | 94.4 | 91.5 | 97.5 | 96.8 | 93.8 | 93.0 |
| Australia total | 114,592 | 198,712 | 57,918 | 75,749 | 151,641 | 167,834 |
| Proportion of import from Australia (%) | 5.5 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 7.0 |
| Other countries | 571 | 497 | 629 | 1,038 | 121 | 153 |
| Proportion of import from other countries (%) | 0.028 | 0.021 | 0.027 | 0.043 | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Discharge at each port and from each country | ||||||
| Port of Yokkaichi, total [B] | 90,341 | 90,204 | 118,948 | 104,047 | 85,189 | 114,944 |
| Proportion of discharge at Yokkaichi (%) [B/A] | 4.4 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| From Canada [C] | 84,119 | 81,500 | 117,984 | 104,047 | 72,612 | 109,811 |
| Proportion of import from Canada (%) [C/B] | 93.1 | 90.4 | 99.2 | 100.0 | 85.2 | 95.5 |
| From Australia [D] | 6,222 | 8,704 | 964 | — | 12,577 | 5,133 |
| Proportion of import from Australia (%) [D/B] | 6.9 | 9.6 | 0.8 | — | 14.8 | 4.5 |
| Port of Kashima, total [E] | 162,036 | 197,886 | 170,148 | 199,269 | 217,462 | 212,951 |
| Proportion of discharge at Kashima (%) [E/A] | 7.8 | 8.4 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| From Canada [F] | 162,036 | 197,886 | 170,148 | 194,815 | 212,222 | 208,198 |
| Proportion of import from Canada (%) [F/E] | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 97.8 | 97.6 | 97.8 |
| From Australia [G] | — | — | — | 4,454 | 5,240 | 4,753 |
| Proportion of import from Australia (%) [G/E] | — | — | — | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| Number of exporter countries | 11 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Number of ports at which oilseed was discharged | 12 | 13 (1) | 13 | 14 (1) | 12 | 13 (1) |
The source of these data is the trade statistics of the Ministry of Finance of Japan (http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm).
The letters in square brackets mean the guide to calculation.
The numbers of airports are given in parentheses.