Cristina Suárez Ferrer1, Elba Llop Herrera2, Marta Calvo Moya3, María Isabel Vera Mendoza4, Irene González Partida5, Yago González Lama6, Virginia Matallana Royo2, José Luis Calleja Panero7, Luis Abreu García7. 1. GASTROENTEROLOGIA, Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda. Madrid, ESPAÑA. 2. GASTROENTEROLOGIA , Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda. Madrid, ESPAÑA. 3. GASTROENTEROLOGIA , Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda. Madrid, españa. 4. AP DIGESTIVO, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda. Madrid, ESPAÑA. 5. DIGESTIVO, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda. Madrid, España. 6. Servicio de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, España. 7. Ap. Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, España.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The possibility of developing idiopathic portal hypertension has been described with thiopurine treatment despite compromises the prognosis of these patients, the fact its true prevalence is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a cohort of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients followed at our unit, to determine the prevalence of diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) and its relationship with thiopurine treatment. RESULTS: At the time of the analysis, 927/1,419 patients were under treatment with thiopurine drugs (65%). A total of 4 patients with IBD type Crohn's disease with idiopathic portal hypertension probably related to the thiopurine treatment were identified (incidence of 4.3 cases per 1,000). Seventy-five percent of patients started with signs or symptoms of portal hypertension. Only one patient was asymptomatic but the diagnosis of IPH because of isolated thrombocytopenia is suspected. However, note that all patients had thrombocytopenia previously. Abdominal ultrasound with fibroscan, hepatic vein catheterization and liver biopsy were performed on all of them as part of the etiology of portal hypertension. In the abdominal ultrasound, indirect portal hypertension data were observed in all patients (as splenomegaly) cirrhosis was also ruled out. The fibroscan data showed significant liver fibrosis (F2-F3). CONCLUSION: Idiopathic portal hypertension following thiopurine treatment in IBD patients is a rare occurrence, but it must be borne in mind in the differential diagnosis for early diagnosis, especially in patients undergoing thiopurine treatment over a long period. The presence of thrombocytopenia is often the only predictor of its development in the preclinical stage.
INTRODUCTION: The possibility of developing idiopathic portal hypertension has been described with thiopurine treatment despite compromises the prognosis of these patients, the fact its true prevalence is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a cohort of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients followed at our unit, to determine the prevalence of diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) and its relationship with thiopurine treatment. RESULTS: At the time of the analysis, 927/1,419 patients were under treatment with thiopurine drugs (65%). A total of 4 patients with IBD type Crohn's disease with idiopathic portal hypertension probably related to the thiopurine treatment were identified (incidence of 4.3 cases per 1,000). Seventy-five percent of patients started with signs or symptoms of portal hypertension. Only one patient was asymptomatic but the diagnosis of IPH because of isolated thrombocytopenia is suspected. However, note that all patients had thrombocytopenia previously. Abdominal ultrasound with fibroscan, hepatic vein catheterization and liver biopsy were performed on all of them as part of the etiology of portal hypertension. In the abdominal ultrasound, indirect portal hypertension data were observed in all patients (as splenomegaly) cirrhosis was also ruled out. The fibroscan data showed significant liver fibrosis (F2-F3). CONCLUSION: Idiopathic portal hypertension following thiopurine treatment in IBDpatients is a rare occurrence, but it must be borne in mind in the differential diagnosis for early diagnosis, especially in patients undergoing thiopurine treatment over a long period. The presence of thrombocytopenia is often the only predictor of its development in the preclinical stage.