Literature DB >> 26837802

Scalable graphene production: perspectives and challenges of plasma applications.

Igor Levchenko1, Kostya Ken Ostrikov2, Jie Zheng3, Xingguo Li3, Michael Keidar4, Kenneth B K Teo5.   

Abstract

Graphene, a newly discovered and extensively investigated material, has many unique and extraordinary properties which promise major technological advances in fields ranging from electronics to mechanical engineering and food production. Unfortunately, complex techniques and high production costs hinder commonplace applications. Scaling of existing graphene production techniques to the industrial level without compromising its properties is a current challenge. This article focuses on the perspectives and challenges of scalability, equipment, and technological perspectives of the plasma-based techniques which offer many unique possibilities for the synthesis of graphene and graphene-containing products. The plasma-based processes are amenable for scaling and could also be useful to enhance the controllability of the conventional chemical vapour deposition method and some other techniques, and to ensure a good quality of the produced graphene. We examine the unique features of the plasma-enhanced graphene production approaches, including the techniques based on inductively-coupled and arc discharges, in the context of their potential scaling to mass production following the generic scaling approaches applicable to the existing processes and systems. This work analyses a large amount of the recent literature on graphene production by various techniques and summarizes the results in a tabular form to provide a simple and convenient comparison of several available techniques. Our analysis reveals a significant potential of scalability for plasma-based technologies, based on the scaling-related process characteristics. Among other processes, a greater yield of 1 g × h(-1) m(-2) was reached for the arc discharge technology, whereas the other plasma-based techniques show process yields comparable to the neutral-gas based methods. Selected plasma-based techniques show lower energy consumption than in thermal CVD processes, and the ability to produce graphene flakes of various sizes reaching hundreds of square millimetres, and the thickness varying from a monolayer to 10-20 layers. Additional factors such as electrical voltage and current, not available in thermal CVD processes could potentially lead to better scalability, flexibility and control of the plasma-based processes. Advantages and disadvantages of various systems are also considered.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26837802     DOI: 10.1039/c5nr06537b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  10 in total

Review 1.  Metallic Biomaterials: Current Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Karthika Prasad; Olha Bazaka; Ming Chua; Madison Rochford; Liam Fedrick; Jordan Spoor; Richard Symes; Marcus Tieppo; Cameron Collins; Alex Cao; David Markwell; Kostya Ken Ostrikov; Kateryna Bazaka
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Process-specific mechanisms of vertically oriented graphene growth in plasmas.

Authors:  Subrata Ghosh; Shyamal R Polaki; Niranjan Kumar; Sankarakumar Amirthapandian; Mohamed Kamruddin; Kostya Ken Ostrikov
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  p-Doping of graphene in hybrid materials with 3,10-diazapicenium dications.

Authors:  Alexandra Roth; Tobias A Schaub; Ute Meinhardt; Dominik Thiel; Jan Storch; Vladimír Církva; Pavel Jakubík; Dirk M Guldi; Milan Kivala
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 4.  Recent progress and perspectives of space electric propulsion systems based on smart nanomaterials.

Authors:  I Levchenko; S Xu; G Teel; D Mariotti; M L R Walker; M Keidar
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Plasma Assisted Reduction of Graphene Oxide Films.

Authors:  Sri Hari Bharath Vinoth Kumar; Ruslan Muydinov; Bernd Szyszka
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Doping free transfer of graphene using aqueous ammonia flow.

Authors:  Morteza Hassanpour Amiri; Jonas Heidler; Ahmar Hasnain; Saleem Anwar; Hao Lu; Klaus Müllen; Kamal Asadi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  CF4 Plasma-Generated LiF-Li2 C2 Artificial Layers for Dendrite-Free Lithium-Metal Anodes.

Authors:  Shengling Cao; Xin He; Lanlan Nie; Jianwei Hu; Manlin Chen; Yu Han; Kangli Wang; Kai Jiang; Min Zhou
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 17.521

8.  Toxicity of Pristine and Chemically Functionalized Fullerenes to White Rot Fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  Zhu Ming; Shicheng Feng; Ailimire Yilihamu; Qiang Ma; Shengnan Yang; Sheng-Tao Yang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  Effect of Precursor on Antifouling Efficacy of Vertically-Oriented Graphene Nanosheets.

Authors:  Karthika Prasad; Chaturanga D Bandara; Shailesh Kumar; Gurinder Pal Singh; Bastian Brockhoff; Kateryna Bazaka; Kostya Ken Ostrikov
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 10.  Towards Repeatable, Scalable Graphene Integrated Micro-Nano Electromechanical Systems (MEMS/NEMS).

Authors:  Joon Hyong Cho; David Cayll; Dipankar Behera; Michael Cullinan
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.