| Literature DB >> 26837497 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thin stillage was used as the substrate to produce intracellular selenium-enriched polysaccharides (ISPS) from Cordyceps sinensis to increase the value of agricultural coproducts.Entities:
Keywords: Cordyceps sinensis; antioxidant activities; fermentation; intracellular selenium-enriched polysaccharides; response surface methodology; thin stillage
Year: 2016 PMID: 26837497 PMCID: PMC4737716 DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v60.30153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Independent variables and their coded levels and values
| Coded level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Symbol | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sodium selenite concentration (µg/mL) | X1 | 10 | 25 | 50 |
| Incubation time (day) | X2 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Incubation temperature (°C) | X3 | 20 | 25 | 30 |
The 3×3 factorial central composite designs and response values for condition optimization of ISPS production
| Trial | X1 | X2 | X3 | ISPS (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 172.64 |
| 2 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 175.83 |
| 3 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 178.55 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 181.02 |
| 5 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 177.38 |
| 6 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 179.04 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 182.38 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 185.66 |
| 9 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 185.31 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 186.12 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 187.75 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 190.46 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 197.66 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 198.07 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 197.22 |
ANOVA for the second-order polynomial equation
| Source | Degree of freedom | Sum of squares | Mean squares | Prob> | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9 | 912.6214 | 101.4024 | 294.9501 | 0.0001 |
| Error | 5 | 1.718975 | 0.343795 | ||
| Total | 14 | 914.3404 |
R2=99.81%; Adj. R2=99.47%; CV=0.31693.
Regression coefficients of a full second-order polynomial model for medium optimization of ISPS production
| Source | Degree of freedom | Coefficients estimated | Standard deviation | Prob>∣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 1 | 5.2 | 0.207303 | 25.0841 | 0.0001 |
| X2 | 1 | 3.14375 | 0.207303 | 15.16503 | 0.0001 |
| X3 | 1 | 1.16125 | 0.207303 | 5.601714 | 0.002505 |
| X1*X1 | 1 | −7.1725 | 0.305141 | −23.5055 | 0.0001 |
| X2*X1 | 1 | −0.8075 | 0.29317 | −2.75437 | 0.040101 |
| X2*X2 | 1 | −0.2725 | 0.29317 | −0.92949 | 0.395295 |
| X3*X1 | 1 | −8.12 | 0.305141 | −26.6106 | 0.0001 |
| X3*X2 | 1 | 0.405 | 0.29317 | 1.38145 | 0.225684 |
| X3*X3 | 1 | −8.415 | 0.305141 | −27.5774 | 0.0001 |
Fig. 1Response surface plot and contour plot of the combined effect of incubation time and sodium selenite concentration on ISPS production by C. sinensis.
Fig. 3Response surface plot and contour plot of the combined effect of incubation temperature and sodium selenite concentration on ISPS production by C. sinensis.
Fig. 2Response surface plot and contour plot of the combined effect of incubation time and incubation temperature on ISPS production by C. sinensis.
Fig. 4IR spectra of the IPS (a) and ISPS (b).
Fig. 5Antioxidant activities of IPS, ISPS, and SSe. (a) Scavenging of hydroxyl radical, (b) scavenging of superoxide radical, (c) Scavenging of DPPH radical and (d) reducing power.
Comparison of fasting blood glucose among the rats in the four groups
| After treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Before treatment | 2 weeks | 4 weeks |
| A | 5.49±0.54 | 5.21±0.37 | 5.19±0.26 |
| B | 15.82±0.73 | 21.63±0.81 | 22.94±0.69 |
| C | 15.79±0.84 | 15.67±0.55 | 15.69±0.67 |
| D | 15.87±0.71 | – | – |
Compared with rats in group C
P<0.01; compared with rats in group A
P<0.01; compared with the results before treatment
P<0.05
P<0.01.
Comparison between changes in glycosylated serum protein at 2 weeks and those at 4 weeks of rats in the four groups after treatment
| Groups | 2 weeks | 4 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| A | 2.09±0.12 | 2.07±0.13 |
| B | 4.25±0.31 | 4.34±0.24 |
| C | 3.12±0.21 | 3.21±0.26 |
| D | 2.11±0.14 | 2.13±0.12 |
Compared with rats in group A
P<0.01; compared with rats in group D
P<0.01.
Malonaldehyde content in serum and tissue of rats in the four groups
| Serum (nmol/mL) | Tissue (nmol/mg prot) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | 2 weeks | 4 weeks | Heart | Liver | Pancreas | Kidney | |
| A | 6 | 5.04±0.62 | 5.31±0.41 | 0.52±0.07 | 0.63±0.08 | 0.41±0.02 | 1.13±0.13 |
| B | 8 | 10.58±0.87 | 13.89±0.94 | 1.03±0.09 | 1.09±0.05 | 1.14±0.11 | 2.09±0.14 |
| C | 8 | 9.25±0.665 | 9.37±0.77 | 0.73±0.06 | 0.89±0.06 | 0.64±0.04 | 1.44±0.12 |
| D | 8 | 6.42±0.43 | 5.13±0.47 | 0.52±0.04 | 0.86±0.07 | 0.47±0.04 | 1.15±0.11 |
Compared with rats in group A
P<0.05
P<0.01; compared with rats in group B
P<0.01; compared with rats in group D
P<0.05
P<0.01; compared with the results before 2 weeks
P<0.05.
Total antioxidant capacity in serum and tissue of rats in the four groups
| Tissue (nmol/mg prot) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Serum (u/mL) | Heart | Liver | Pancreas | Kidney | |
| A | 6 | 8.72±0.78 | 0.51±0.04 | 1.29±0.10 | 0.81±0.07 | 1.10±0.06 |
| B | 8 | 3.38±0.13 | 0.25±0.01 | 0.47±0.03 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.34±0.02 |
| C | 8 | 4.87±0.25 | 0.37±0.03 | 0.68±0.05 | 0.72±0.06 | 0.69±0.08 |
| D | 8 | 6.92±0.54 | 0.51±0.3 | 0.74±0.04 | 0.97±0.08 | 1.02±0.13 |
Compared with rats in group A
P<0.01; compared with rats in group B
P<0.05
P<0.01; compared with rats in group D
P<0.05
P<0.01.