Literature DB >> 26837339

Preclinical 89Zr Immuno-PET of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Lymph Node Metastasis.

Sai Kiran Sharma1, Kuntal K Sevak2, Sebastien Monette3, Sean D Carlin2, James C Knight4, Frank R Wuest4, Evis Sala5, Brian M Zeglis6, Jason S Lewis7.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The elevation of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels in the serum of asymptomatic patients precedes the radiologic detection of high-grade serous ovarian cancer by at least 2 mo and the final clinical diagnosis by 5 mo. PET imaging of CA125 expression by ovarian cancer cells may enhance the evaluation of the extent of disease and provide a roadmap to surgery as well as detect recurrence and metastases.
METHODS: (89)Zr-labeled mAb-B43.13 was synthesized to target CA125 and evaluated via PET imaging and biodistribution studies in mice bearing OVCAR3 human ovarian adenocarcinoma xenografts. Ex vivo analysis of tumors and lymph nodes was performed via autoradiography, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: PET imaging using (89)Zr-DFO-mAb-B43.13 (DFO is desferrioxamine) clearly delineated CA125-positive OVCAR3 xenografts as early as 24 h after the administration of the radioimmunoconjugate. Biodistribution studies revealed accretion of (89)Zr-DFO-mAb-B43.13 in the OVCAR3 tumors, ultimately reaching 22.3 ± 6.3 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 72 h after injection. Most interestingly, activity concentrations greater than 50 %ID/g were observed in the ipsilateral lymph nodes of the xenograft-bearing mice. Histopathologic analysis of the immuno-PET-positive lymph nodes revealed the presence of grossly metastasized ovarian cancer cells within the lymphoid tissues. In control experiments, only low-level, non-specific uptake of (89)Zr-labeled isotype IgG was observed in OVCAR3 tumors; similarly, low-activity concentrations of (89)Zr-DFO-mAb-B43.13 accumulated in CA125-negative SKOV3 tumors.
CONCLUSION: Immuno-PET with (89)Zr-labeled mAb-B43.13 is a potential strategy for the noninvasive delineation of extent of disease and may add value in treatment planning and treatment monitoring of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  89Zr; CA125; ovarian cancer; positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26837339      PMCID: PMC4959443          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.167072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  25 in total

Review 1.  PET imaging with ⁸⁹Zr: from radiochemistry to the clinic.

Authors:  Melissa A Deri; Brian M Zeglis; Lynn C Francesconi; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Value of lymph node assessment in ovarian cancer: Status of the art at the end of the second millennium.

Authors:  F. Di Re; G. Baiocchi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gadducci; S Cosio; P Zola; F Landoni; T Maggino; E Sartori
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  Lymph node-positive stage IIIC ovarian cancer: a separate entity?

Authors:  Jonathan S Berek
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 5.  Immunotherapy of ovarian cancer with antibodies: a focus on oregovomab.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berek
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.388

6.  Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients.

Authors:  T Onda; H Yoshikawa; T Yasugi; M Mishima; S Nakagawa; M Yamada; K Matsumoto; Y Taketani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Metastatic lymph node number in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: does it have any clinical significance?

Authors:  Ali Ayhan; Murat Gultekin; Polat Dursun; Nasuh Utku Dogan; Guldeniz Aksan; Suleyman Guven; Melih Velipasaoglu; Kunter Yuce
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Current approaches and challenges in managing and monitoring treatment response in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte S Marcus; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy; Chad A Hamilton; William P McGuire
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Immuno-PET of epithelial ovarian cancer: harnessing the potential of CA125 for non-invasive imaging.

Authors:  Sai Kiran Sharma; Melinda Wuest; Monica Wang; Darryl Glubrecht; Bonnie Andrais; Suzanne E Lapi; Frank Wuest
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Recurrent ovarian cancer with multiple lymph nodes metastases successfully treated with lymphadenectomy as secondary cytoreductive surgery: A case report.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nagano; Mitsue Muraoka; Koichiro Takagi
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-18
View more
  16 in total

1.  A Molecularly Targeted Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Agent for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly Fung; Sai Kiran Sharma; Outi Keinänen; Kara Long Roche; Jason S Lewis; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Radiopharmacologic screening of antibodies to the unshed ectodomain of MUC16 in ovarian cancer identifies a lead candidate for clinical translation.

Authors:  Brandon Nemieboka; Sai Kiran Sharma; Thapi Dharma Rao; Kimberly J Edwards; Su Yan; Pei Wang; Ashwin Ragupathi; Alessandra Piersigilli; David R Spriggs; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Development of a MUC16-Targeted Near-Infrared Fluorescent Antibody Conjugate for Intraoperative Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Madeline T Olson; Nicholas E Wojtynek; Geoffrey A Talmon; Thomas C Caffrey; Prakash Radhakrishnan; Quan P Ly; Michael A Hollingsworth; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  ImmunoPET of Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer with AR9.6, a Novel MUC16-Targeted Therapeutic Antibody.

Authors:  Sai Kiran Sharma; Kyeara N Mack; Alessandra Piersigilli; Jacob Pourat; Kimberly J Edwards; Outi Keinänen; Maria S Jiao; Huiyong Zhao; Brandy White; Cory L Brooks; Elisa de Stanchina; Madi R Madiyalakan; Michael A Hollingsworth; Prakash Radhakrishnan; Jason S Lewis; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  ImmunoPET: Antibody-Based PET Imaging in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid; Bahar Ataeinia; Shaghayegh Ranjbar; Zahra Jamshidi Araghi; Mohammad Mobin Moradi; Christian Pirich; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Sai Kiran Sharma; Brandon Nemieboka; Evis Sala; Jason S Lewis; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Zachary T Rosenkrans; Jianjun Liu; Gang Huang; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Development of Fluorescence Imaging Probes for Labeling COX-1 in Live Ovarian Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Jatinder Kaur; Atul Bhardwaj; Frank Wuest
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 9.  Advancing Immune and Cell-Based Therapies Through Imaging.

Authors:  Vladimir Ponomarev
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Targeting MT1-MMP as an ImmunoPET-Based Strategy for Imaging Gliomas.

Authors:  A G de Lucas; A J Schuhmacher; M Oteo; E Romero; J A Cámara; A de Martino; A G Arroyo; M Á Morcillo; M Squatrito; J L Martinez-Torrecuadrada; F Mulero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.