Bruria Hirsh Raccah1, Amichai Perlman2, Haim D Danenberg3, Arthur Pollak3, Mordechai Muszkat4, Ilan Matok5. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 2. Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 3. Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 5. Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: ilan.matok@ekmd.huji.ac.il.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used as an alternative for traditional antithrombotic therapy. However, the safety profile of DOACs in patients with renal failure (RF) has not been determined. METHODS: A systematic review was performed assessing the reported safety of DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with RF and estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCL) < 50 mL/min and eCrCL 50 to 80 mL/min. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for randomized clinical trials up to November 2015. The data were pooled by using both traditional frequentist and Bayesian random effects models. RESULTS: Nine trials met the inclusion criteria. Among 94,897 participants, 54,667 (58%) had RF. Compared with VKAs, DOACs were associated with a significantly decreased risk for major bleeding in patients with eCrCL 50 to 80 mL/min (risk ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.93]) and a nonsignificant decrease in the risk for major bleeding in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min (risk ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.68-1.02]); there was evidence of significant heterogeneity. Indirect comparisons, using Bayesian network analysis, indicated that apixaban was associated with a decreased rate of major bleeding compared with other DOACs in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min. DOACs were associated with a significant decrease in the risk for hemorrhagic stroke compared with VKAs in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min and 50 to 80 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: As a class, DOACs are associated with a reduced risk for hemorrhagic stroke compared with VKAs in patients with RF. However, DOACs may differ from each other in their relative risk for major bleeding in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min. TRIAL REGISTRY: PROSPERO registry; No.: CRD42014013730; URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014013730.
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used as an alternative for traditional antithrombotic therapy. However, the safety profile of DOACs in patients with renal failure (RF) has not been determined. METHODS: A systematic review was performed assessing the reported safety of DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with RF and estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCL) < 50 mL/min and eCrCL 50 to 80 mL/min. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for randomized clinical trials up to November 2015. The data were pooled by using both traditional frequentist and Bayesian random effects models. RESULTS: Nine trials met the inclusion criteria. Among 94,897 participants, 54,667 (58%) had RF. Compared with VKAs, DOACs were associated with a significantly decreased risk for major bleeding in patients with eCrCL 50 to 80 mL/min (risk ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.93]) and a nonsignificant decrease in the risk for major bleeding in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min (risk ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.68-1.02]); there was evidence of significant heterogeneity. Indirect comparisons, using Bayesian network analysis, indicated that apixaban was associated with a decreased rate of major bleeding compared with other DOACs in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min. DOACs were associated with a significant decrease in the risk for hemorrhagic stroke compared with VKAs in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min and 50 to 80 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: As a class, DOACs are associated with a reduced risk for hemorrhagic stroke compared with VKAs in patients with RF. However, DOACs may differ from each other in their relative risk for major bleeding in patients with eCrCL < 50 mL/min. TRIAL REGISTRY: PROSPERO registry; No.: CRD42014013730; URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014013730.
Authors: Domenico Prisco; Walter Ageno; Cecilia Becattini; Armando D'Angelo; Giovanni Davì; Raimondo De Cristofaro; Francesco Dentali; Giovanni Di Minno; Anna Falanga; Gualberto Gussoni; Luca Masotti; Gualtiero Palareti; Pasquale Pignatelli; Roberto M Santi; Francesca Santilli; Mauro Silingardi; Antonella Tufano; Francesco Violi Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Debnath Maji; Aman Opneja; Michael A Suster; Kara L Bane; Brigid M Wilson; Pedram Mohseni; Evi X Stavrou Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Pietro Scicchitano; Marco Tucci; Maria Consiglia Bellino; Francesca Cortese; Annagrazia Cecere; Micaela De Palo; Francesco Massari; Pasquale Caldarola; Francesco Silvestris; Marco Matteo Ciccone Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 3.727