Literature DB >> 26836783

Patient physiological status during emergency care and rapid response team or cardiac arrest team activation during early hospital admission.

Julie Considine1, Daryl Jones, David Pilcher, Judy Currey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between rapid response team (RRT) or cardiac arrest team (CAT) activation within 72 h of emergency admission and (i) physiological status in the emergency department (ED) and (ii) risk for ICU admission and in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted in three hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. The exposed cohort (n=660) included randomly selected adults admitted to the medical or surgical ward through the ED who had RRT or CAT activation within 72 h of admission. Unexposed matched controls (n=1320) did not have RRT or CAT activation.
RESULTS: The exposed cohort was more likely to have physiological abnormalities fulfilling hospital RRT activation criteria during ED care (36.7 vs. 23.8%, P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, tachypnoea (adjusted odds ratio=1.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-2.67) or hypotension (AOR=1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-2.03), fulfilling RRT activation criteria during ED care, was associated with RRT or CAT activation within 72 h of admission. The exposed cohort had more in-hospital deaths (16.5 vs. 3.6%, P<0.001), more unexpected in-hospital deaths (2.05 vs. 0.2%, P<0.001), more ICU admissions (11.8 vs. 0.7%, P<0.001) and longer lengths of hospital stay (median=8 vs. 5 days, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: CAT/RRT activations within 72 h of emergency admission are associated with higher mortality and increased length of stay. Factors associated with CAT/RRT activation in the wards are often identifiable when patients are in the ED. Further studies are required to determine whether early identification and intervention in patients at risk for RRT or CAT activation can improve their eventual outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26836783     DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  4 in total

1.  Multisite implementation of a workflow-integrated machine learning system to optimize COVID-19 hospital admission decisions.

Authors:  Jeremiah S Hinson; Eili Klein; Aria Smith; Matthew Toerper; Trushar Dungarani; David Hager; Peter Hill; Gabor Kelen; Joshua D Niforatos; R Scott Stephens; Alexandra T Strauss; Scott Levin
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-16

Review 2.  Systems for recognition and response to deteriorating emergency department patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Julie Considine; Margaret Fry; Kate Curtis; Ramon Z Shaban
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Nurses responding to the World Health Organization (WHO) priority for emergency care systems for universal health coverage.

Authors:  Kate Curtis; Petra Brysiewicz; Ramon Z Shaban; Margaret Fry; Julie Considine; Fanny Esperanza Acevedo Gamboa; Maria Holden; Tanya Heyns; Margie Peden
Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.142

4.  Implementation of a structured emergency nursing framework results in significant cost benefit.

Authors:  Kate Curtis; Prabhu Sivabalan; David S Bedford; Julie Considine; Alfa D'Amato; Nada Shepherd; Margaret Fry; Belinda Munroe; Ramon Z Shaban
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.