Literature DB >> 26836628

Robotic Liver Surgery: Early Experience From a Single Surgical Center.

Yolanda Quijano1, Emilio Vicente, Benedetto Ielpo, Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Sergio Olivares, Valentina Ferri, Irene Ortega, Luis Malavé, Antonio Ferronetti, Giuseppe Piccinni, Riccardo Caruso.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of robotic surgery in liver resection is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective review of Sanchinarro University hospital experience of robotic liver resection performed from 2011 to 2014. Clinicopathologic characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty-one procedures have been performed and 13 (65%) of them were for malignancy. There were 2 left hepatectomies, 1 right hepatectomy, 1 associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), 1 bisegmentectomy and 3 segmentectomies, 9 wedge resections, and 3 pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 minutes (range, 90 to 540 min). Overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7% and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range, 4 to 64 d).
CONCLUSION: From our early experience, robotic liver surgery is a safe and feasible procedure, especially for major hepatectomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26836628     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Approach to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma is Associated with an Exacerbation of Inadequate Nodal Staging.

Authors:  Sean P Martin; Justin Drake; Michael M Wach; Samantha Ruff; Laurence P Diggs; Jim Y Wan; Zachary J Brown; Reed I Ayabe; Evan S Glazer; Paxton V Dickson; Jeremy L Davis; Jeremiah L Deneve; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  [Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery. German version].

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  L C Franken; M J van der Poel; A E J Latenstein; M J Zwart; E Roos; O R Busch; M G Besselink; T M van Gulik
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-05-02

5.  Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience.

Authors:  Manuel Durán; Javier Briceño; Ana Padial; Ferdinando Massimiliano Anelli; Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo; María Dolores Ayllón; Rafael Calleja-Lozano; Carmen García-Gaitan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

6.  The role of robotic surgery for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Brolese; Marta Rigoni; Alessio Pasquale; Giovanni Viel; Marco Brolese; Francesco Antonio Ciarleglio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery.

Authors:  Laleh G Melstrom; Susanne G Warner; Yanghee Woo; Virginia Sun; Byrne Lee; Gagandeep Singh; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lilong Zhang; Qihang Yuan; Yao Xu; Weixing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.