Literature DB >> 26836060

Is it Appropriate for Patients to be Discharged at the Scene by Paramedics?

Hideo Tohira, Daniel Fatovich, Teresa A Williams, Alexandra P Bremner, Glenn Arendts, Ian R Rogers, Antonio Celenza, David Mountain, Peter Cameron, Peter Sprivulis, Tony Ahern, Judith Finn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients who are discharged at the scene by paramedics are not fully understood.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the risk of re-presentation and/or death in prehospital patients discharged at the scene.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked ambulance, emergency department (ED), and death data. We compared outcomes in patients who were discharged at the scene by paramedics with those who were transported to ED by paramedics and then discharged from ED between January 1 and December 31, 2013 in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Occurrences of subsequent ambulance requests, ED attendance, hospital admission and death were compared between those discharged at the scene and those discharged from ED.
RESULTS: There were 47,330 patients during the study period, of whom 19,732 and 27,598 patients were discharged at the scene and from ED, respectively. Compared to those discharged from ED, those discharged at the scene were more likely to subsequently: request an ambulance (6.1% vs. 1.8%, adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-3.9), attend ED (4.6% vs. 1.4%, adj OR 3.3; 95% CI 2.8-3.8), be admitted to hospital (3.3% vs. 0.8%, adj OR 4.2; 95% CI 3.4-5.1). Those discharged at the scene tended towards an increased likelihood of death (0.2% vs. 0.1%, adj OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.99-3.2) within 24 hours of discharge compared to those discharged from ED.
CONCLUSION: Patients attended by paramedics who were discharged at the scene had more subsequent events than those who were transported to and discharged from ED. Further consideration needs to be given to who is suitable to be discharged at the scene by paramedics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency Medical Services; paramedics; patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26836060     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1128028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  15 in total

1.  Using machine learning to predict subsequent events after EMS non-conveyance decisions.

Authors:  Jani Paulin; Akseli Reunamo; Jouni Kurola; Hans Moen; Sanna Salanterä; Heikki Riihimäki; Tero Vesanen; Mari Koivisto; Timo Iirola
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Characteristics of non-conveyance ambulance runs: A retrospective study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Mariola Castelijns; Joost Frenken; Lilian C M Vloet
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2019

Review 3.  A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Lilian C M Vloet; Renate F Speijers; Nico W Tönjes; Jorik Loef; Thomas Pelgrim; Margreet Hoogeveen; Sivera A A Berben
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Non-conveyance in the ambulance service: a population-based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden.

Authors:  Jakob Lederman; Veronica Lindström; Carina Elmqvist; Caroline Löfvenmark; Therese Djärv
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a trigger tool study.

Authors:  Magnus Andersson Hagiwara; Carl Magnusson; Johan Herlitz; Elin Seffel; Christer Axelsson; Monica Munters; Anneli Strömsöe; Lena Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-24

6.  Examination of EMS Decision Making in Determining Suitability of Patient Diversion to Urgent Care Centers.

Authors:  Gerard Carroll; Katelyn Levy; Richard Pescatore; Rick Hong
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-02

7.  Assessing non-conveyed patients in the ambulance service: a phenomenological interview study with Swedish ambulance clinicians.

Authors:  Jakob Lederman; Caroline Löfvenmark; Therese Djärv; Veronica Lindström; Carina Elmqvist
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Ambulance nurses' experiences of deciding a patient does not require ambulance care.

Authors:  Tess Backman; Päivi Juuso; Ronja Borg; Åsa Engström
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-03-19

9.  Changing role of EMS -analyses of non-conveyed and conveyed patients in Finland.

Authors:  Jani Paulin; Jouni Kurola; Sanna Salanterä; Hans Moen; Nischal Guragain; Mari Koivisto; Niina Käyhkö; Venla Aaltonen; Timo Iirola
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Stakeholder opinion on the proposal to introduce 'treat and referral' into the Irish emergency medical service.

Authors:  Brian Power; Gerard Bury; John Ryan
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.