| Literature DB >> 26835153 |
Fumihito Yoshii1, Yusuke Moriya1, Tomohide Ohnuki1, Masafuchi Ryo1, Wakoh Takahashi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various postural deformities appear during progression of Parkinson's disease (PD), but the underlying pathophysiology of these deformities is not well understood. The angle abnormalities seen in individual patients may not be due to distinct causes, but rather they may have occurred in an interrelated manner to maintain a balanced posture.Entities:
Keywords: Balance; Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage; Levodopa equivalent dose; Mutual correlations; Parkinson’s disease; Postural deformity
Year: 2016 PMID: 26835153 PMCID: PMC4731916 DOI: 10.1186/s40734-016-0029-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Mov Disord ISSN: 2054-7072
Fig. 1Schematic representation of body angles. In lateral view photographs (left), NF (neck flexion) angle was defined as the angle between two intersecting lines: a line connecting the external acoustic foramen and the acromion, and another line connecting the acromion and the greater trochanter. Similarly, FB (fore-bent) angle was defined as the angle between a vertical line and the line connecting the acromion with the greater trochanter. KB (knee-bent) angle was defined as the angle between the line connecting the greater trochanter and knee, and the line connecting knee and lateral malleolus. In back view photographs (right), LB (lateral-bent) angle was defined as the angle between a vertical line and the line connecting the posterior process of the seventh cervical vertebra with that of the fifth lumbar vertebra
Fig. 2NF, FB, KB and LB angles in male and female PD patients. NF angle was significantly larger in males than in females (P < 0.05), but FB, KB and LB angles showed no significant difference between males and females
Correlation coefficients between NF, FB, KB, LB angles and clinical predictors
| Age | Disease Duration | H&Y stage | LED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF | 0.175 | 0.197 * | 0.350 *** | 0.135 |
| FB | 0.246 ** | 0.196 * | 0.492 *** | 0.243 ** |
| KB | 0.359 *** | 0.098 | 0.381 *** | 0.111 |
| LB | 0.162 | 0.103 | 0.213 * | 0.173 |
FB and KB angles increased significantly with advancing age. NF and FB angles were significantly associated with disease duration. All the measured angles increased significantly with advancing H&Y stage. There was a significant association between LED and FB, but not the other angles
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001
Fig. 3The relationship between laterality of the initial symptom and LB angle. Bending side (direction of LB angle) was not associated with the side of the initial symptom
Mutual correlation coefficients among the measured angles (All)
| FB | KB | LB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NF | 0.166 | 0.275 ** | 0.250 ** |
| FB | 0.335 *** | 0.141 | |
| KB | 0.225 * |
NF and KB, NF and LB, FB and KB, KB and LB were significantly positively correlated. FB (camptocormia) showed a particularly strong correlation with KB (bending of the knee)
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001
Mutual correlation coefficients among the measured angles (By age)
| <70 years old ( | |||
| FB | KB | LB | |
| NF | 0.111 | 0.241 | 0.199 |
| FB | 0.234 | 0.070 | |
| KB | 0.163 | ||
| ≧70 years old ( | |||
| FB | KB | LB | |
| NF | 0.166 | 0.245 | 0.269 * |
| FB | 0.375 ** | 0.137 | |
| KB | 0.190 | ||
Significant correlations were found only in the older group, between NF and LB, and between FB and KB
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
Mutual correlation coefficients among the measured angles (By gender)
| Male ( | |||
| FB | KB | LB | |
| NF | 0.271 * | 0.228 | 0.305 * |
| FB | 0.402 *** | 0.222 | |
| KB | 0.078 | ||
| Female ( | |||
| FB | KB | LB | |
| NF | −0.011 | 0.359 ** | 0.286 * |
| FB | 0.295 * | 0.095 | |
| KB | 0.381 ** | ||
Significant correlations were found between NF and LB and between FB and KB in both sexes
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001