Literature DB >> 26834534

Perceptual Correlates of Turkish Word Stress and Their Contribution to Automatic Lexical Access: Evidence from Early ERP Components.

Hatice Zora1, Mattias Heldner1, Iris-Corinna Schwarz1.   

Abstract

Perceptual correlates of Turkish word stress and their contribution to lexical access were studied using the mismatch negativity (MMN) component in event-related potentials (ERPs). The MMN was expected to indicate if segmentally identical Turkish words were distinguished on the sole basis of prosodic features such as fundamental frequency (f 0), spectral emphasis (SE), and duration. The salience of these features in lexical access was expected to be reflected in the amplitude of MMN responses. In a multi-deviant oddball paradigm, neural responses to changes in f 0, SE, and duration individually, as well as to all three features combined, were recorded for words and pseudowords presented to 14 native speakers of Turkish. The word and pseudoword contrast was used to differentiate language-related effects from acoustic-change effects on the neural responses. First and in line with previous findings, the overall MMN was maximal over frontal and central scalp locations. Second, changes in prosodic features elicited neural responses both in words and pseudowords, confirming the brain's automatic response to any change in auditory input. However, there were processing differences between the prosodic features, most significantly in f 0: While f 0 manipulation elicited a slightly right-lateralized frontally-maximal MMN in words, it elicited a frontal P3a in pseudowords. Considering that P3a is associated with involuntary allocation of attention to salient changes, the manipulations of f 0 in the absence of lexical processing lead to an intentional evaluation of pitch change. f 0 is therefore claimed to be lexically specified in Turkish. Rather than combined features, individual prosodic features differentiate language-related effects from acoustic-change effects. The present study confirms that segmentally identical words can be distinguished on the basis of prosodic information alone, and establishes the salience of f 0 in lexical access.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turkish; event-related potential; lexical access; prosody; word stress

Year:  2016        PMID: 26834534      PMCID: PMC4718990          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  27 in total

1.  The additivity of the auditory feature analysis in the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity: 1+1 approximately 2 but 1+1+1<3.

Authors:  P Paavilainen; S Valppu; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller; T Kujala; Y Shtyrov; J Simola; H Tiitinen; P Alku; K Alho; S Martinkauppi; R J Ilmoniemi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.

Authors:  R Näätänen; P Paavilainen; T Rinne; K Alho
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: an event-related potential and dipole-model analysis.

Authors:  M H Giard; J Lavikahen; K Reinikainen; F Perrin; O Bertrand; J Pernier; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?

Authors:  D Deacon; J M Nousak; M Pilotti; W Ritter; C M Yang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  R Näätänen; I Winkler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.

Authors:  N K Squires; K C Squires; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-04

10.  Left hemispheric dipole locations of the neuromagnetic mismatch negativity to frequency, intensity and duration deviants.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Phonological Variations Are Compensated at the Lexical Level: Evidence From Auditory Neural Activity.

Authors:  Hatice Zora; Tomas Riad; Sari Ylinen; Valéria Csépe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Concurrent affective and linguistic prosody with the same emotional valence elicits a late positive ERP response.

Authors:  Hatice Zora; Mary Rudner; Anna K Montell Magnusson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Perception of Prosodic Modulations of Linguistic and Paralinguistic Origin: Evidence From Early Auditory Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Hatice Zora; Valéria Csépe
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Lexical Specification of Prosodic Information in Swedish: Evidence from Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Hatice Zora; Tomas Riad; Iris-Corinna Schwarz; Mattias Heldner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.