Literature DB >> 26834098

Imaging Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: Staging and Response Assessment.

Gary J R Cook1, Gurdip K Azad2, Vicky Goh2.   

Abstract

Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced breast cancer. Given the significant associated morbidity, the introduction of new, effective systemic therapies, and the improvement in survival time, early detection and response assessment of skeletal metastases have become even more important. Although planar bone scanning has recognized limitations, in particular, poor specificity in staging and response assessment, it continues to be the main method in current clinical practice for staging of the skeleton in patients at risk of bone metastases. However, the accuracy of bone scanning can be improved with the addition of SPECT/CT. There have been reported improvements in sensitivity and specificity for staging of the skeleton with either bone-specific PET/CT tracers, such as (18)F-NaF, or tumor-specific tracers, such as (18)F-FDG, although these methods are less widely available and more costly. There is a paucity of data on the use of (18)F-NaF PET/CT for response assessment in breast cancer, but there is increasing evidence that (18)F-FDG PET/CT may improve on current methods in this regard. At the same time, interest and experience in using whole-body morphologic MRI augmented with diffusion-weighted imaging for both staging and response assessment in the skeleton have been increasing. However, data on comparisons of these methods with PET methods to determine the best technique for current clinical practice or for clinical trials are insufficient. There are early data supporting the use (18)F-FDG PET/MRI to assess malignant disease in the skeleton, with the possibility of taking advantage of the synergies offered by combining morphologic, physiologic, and metabolic imaging.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; PET/CT; SPECT; bone scanning; oncology; skeletal metastases

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26834098     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  24 in total

1.  Osseous sarcoidosis mimicking metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Henry Li; Laurence Stillwater; Mark Bryanton; Christina A Kim
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Augmented planar bone scintigraphy obtained from a whole-body SPECT recording of less than 20 min with a high-sensitivity 360° CZT camera.

Authors:  Saifeddine Melki; Mohammad Bilal Chawki; Pierre-Yves Marie; Laetitia Imbert; Antoine Verger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Christopher Riedl; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  An analysis of clinical values of MRI, CT and X-ray in differentiating benign and malignant bone metastases.

Authors:  Chun Xiong; Xian Xu; Huiling Zhang; Bo Zeng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Molecular Imaging of Biomarkers in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Chris C Riedl; Maura N Dickler; Komal Jhaveri; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Wolfgang Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Clinical Potential of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Lanell M Peterson; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

7.  Prospective Study of Serial 18F-FDG PET and 18F-Fluoride PET to Predict Time to Skeletal-Related Events, Time to Progression, and Survival in Patients with Bone-Dominant Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; Janet O'Sullivan; Qian Vicky Wu; Alena Novakova-Jiresova; Isaac Jenkins; Jean H Lee; Andrew Shields; Susan Montgomery; Hannah M Linden; Julie Gralow; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Mark Muzi; Paul Kinahan; David Mankoff; Jennifer M Specht
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Application of Noninvasive Imaging to Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer: Facts and Future.

Authors:  Zhongquan Cheng; Yang Du; Leyi Yu; Zhu Yuan; Jie Tian
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Mimickers of Hill-Sachs Lesions [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Allison Herring; Derik L Davis
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.248

10.  Iodine Map Radiomics in Breast Cancer: Prediction of Metastatic Status.

Authors:  Lukas Lenga; Simon Bernatz; Simon S Martin; Christian Booz; Christine Solbach; Rotraud Mulert-Ernst; Thomas J Vogl; Doris Leithner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.