Literature DB >> 26834046

Cost-effectiveness of a pro-active approach of urinary incontinence in women.

K M Vermeulen1, E Visser2, E J Messelink3, A J Schram4, M Y Berger2, G H de Bock1, J H Dekker2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of actively encouraging older community-dwelling women with urinary incontinence to be diagnosed and treated.
DESIGN: The study was designed as cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. Analyses were performed from a societal perspective. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were taken into account and valued according to the standard Dutch guidelines for economic evaluations.
SETTING: Primary care. POPULATION: Study participants were 350 community-dwelling women 55 years or older with urinary incontinence.
METHODS: Women in the intervention group were invited for diagnostic testing and treatment. The control group received usual care according to the Dutch guideline on urinary incontinence. Follow-up period was 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incontinence Impact Adjusted Life Years (IIALY), Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and incremental costs calculated per IIALY and per QALY gained.
RESULTS: Costs per extra life year without impact on daily life from urinary incontinence amounted to €5179 (95% CI -17 323 to 36 260). Costs per QALY amounted to €23 907 (95% CI -124 849 to 121 849). Assuming a ceiling ratio of €20 000, the probability that the intervention was cost-effective based on IIALYs was 91% and 46% based on QALYs.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in severity of incontinence in older community-dwelling women can be achieved against reasonable costs, with an improvement of symptom-specific QALYs. Findings support an active role of primary care physicians towards women who hesitate to ask for help for urinary incontinence. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Encouraging women with urinary incontinence to be treated, improves symptoms and QOL against reasonable costs.
© 2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active approach; cost-effectiveness; costs; incontinence; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26834046     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  2 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies.

Authors:  Sandra Zwolsman; Arnoud Kastelein; Joost Daams; Jan-Paul Roovers; B C Opmeer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Cost-effectiveness of an app-based treatment for urinary incontinence in comparison with care-as-usual in Dutch general practice: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 12 months.

Authors:  Anne M M Loohuis; Henk Van Der Worp; Nienke J Wessels; Janny H Dekker; Marijke C Ph Slieker-Ten Hove; Marjolein Y Berger; Karin M Vermeulen; Marco H Blanker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 7.331

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.